Fun with graphs....PSU lifetime, Paterno, last 5 yr comparisons

[PSUEngineerx2]

Just playing around with PSU win percentages over the lifetime of the program, over Joe's tenure, and over the last 5 years.

Included comparisons with Pitt's program for fun.

Look at the "Delta" number on each graph, in particular on the graph comparing PSU and Pitt win percentages during Joe's tenure.

No wonder they hate him....+23% win percentage between us and them during his tenure.

 

[jennjeffjoe]

Just playing around with PSU win percentages over the lifetime of the program, over Joe's tenure, and over the last 5 years.

Included comparisons with Pitt's program for fun.

Look at the "Delta" number on each graph, in particular on the graph comparing PSU and Pitt win percentages during Joe's tenure.

No wonder they hate him....+23% win percentage between us and them during his tenure.

View embedded media

 

[jennjeffjoe]

Good work.

 

[PSUEngineerx2]

Thank you. Cool to see the wins laid out this way (at least for me it is).

After you see the graphs with your own eyes, still hard to believe how crap Pitt has been for decades upon decades. Fun stuff.

 

[BobPSU92]

What those graphs tell me is that pitt football is not very good.

 

[PSUEngineerx2]

What those graphs tell me is that pitt football is not very good.

Amazing PSU STILL had 13% higher average win percentage over last 5 years (i.e., over sanction years) - see last graph.

In other words, you are correct BobPSU92, they truly suck.

 

[BobPSU92]

Amazing PSU STILL had 13% higher average win percentage over last 5 years (i.e., over sanction years) - see last graph.

In other words, you are correct BobPSU92, they truly suck.

Yeah, but, pitt is more selective in their recruiting as evidenced by their graduation rate. Wait.

Yeah, but, pitt plays in a tougher conference. Wait.

Yeah, but, Joe knew. Wait.