That is what they are reporting. I have nothing else to tell you. They could have the start time wrong.
Even that seems unlikely--they definitely aren't going to vacate the title--we already knew that.
If they didn't already announce it then it won't impact 2024. I'm actually shocked that this would indicate we hear something before 2025
It's always weird that people want a title vacated--it doesn't change anything anyone saw--it's an asterisk that really means nothing.
"Michigan is expected to fight back against any postseason ban'NCAA Expected to Issue Notice of Allegations Against Michigan This Week, Reportedly Could Seek One- or Two-Year Postseason Ban
The NCAA is reportedly expected to issue a Notice of Allegations against Michigan this week and could seek a one- or two-year postseason ban against the Wolverines.www.elevenwarriors.com
The article.
sure, if you think 11 warriors is a reputable source...if you read their board, PSU is commonly referred to as ped stateNCAA Expected to Issue Notice of Allegations Against Michigan This Week, Reportedly Could Seek One- or Two-Year Postseason Ban
The NCAA is reportedly expected to issue a Notice of Allegations against Michigan this week and could seek a one- or two-year postseason ban against the Wolverines.
The article.
that's fine, but the whole thread got started by the op stating,.."heard on 11 warriors"...the NOA hasn't been delivered, nobody that's posting an article or tweet knows anything,lol..might as well post a link to a UM board with a counter article,lol....what's next, quotes from nevada buck?
yes, and the UM fans are very vocal about balas being unreliable, some say he posts when he's been drinking..my point stands, until the NOA is sent, anything being put out there is made up bs...this whole thread has been opining about rumors reporting on gossip repeating fan fiction from partisan boards..total waste, lol
Take away 20 scholarships per year. That way they would only get 85.
And the NCAA should not have waited on investigations to be completed and just levied a penalty on the spot. Kinda like they did with PSU, right?
Nope but they should get notified by Thursday of this week what the real allegations are after that there is a process to get to the sanctions whatever they will be.
What you are saying makes sense however.. the Playiff committee has to also make a decision.. the worse thing I see in this whole Michigan scandal.. is that Harbaugh refused to cooperate..that sent a very loud message to any authorities.. “
If that's the case, and it is, then the other schools shouldn't play the role of the lamb going to the slaughter. Rather, they should employ the same means if not more aggressive ones. We all know that it's the Wild, Wild West, and I actually have a grudging respect for a program like Michigan that realized this and took full advantage of it.
I've read this from a lot of different people and just frankly isn't correct (re: CFP)
You can't realistically limit TV appearances for contractual and $$ reasons (i.e. that would actually hurt the rest of the conference). I don't think this is possible, but would be interesting to see them ban them from hosting home games for a year. Huge financial impact to the university.
The NCAA learned a lot from their unjust and illegal actions against PSU. This is (part of) why they took no action against USC, UM, MSU or OSU for their sexual abuse scandals (even though those directly involved NCAA atheletes and fall under the NCAA jurisdiction in a way that PSU did not).
UM will get one, two years max. UM is the defending natty and the NCAA is going to phone it in. And will rosters going up to 105, if by chance the NCAA would doc them five or so, would be meaningless.
I agree, although I think a 2 year post-season ban would have a pretty massive impact on recruiting and roster retention (i.e. I think you'd see a mass exodus via the portal).
one year would not because those kids are already on the team (2024 post-season ban). 2025 may affect portal transfers but the classes are pretty much set.
We let them--even encouraged them. You can't compare anything to us because we destroyed ourselves
you can't just make up sanctions out of whole cloth, especially when 3rd parties would go to court to protect their monetary interests..tenn didn't get a bowl ban, and they had 18 level 1 violations and over 200 level 2..the ncaa won't go outside of precedence that they themselves set in the past..they were threatened with lawsuits by the tenn AG and legislature, pretty sure at least 1 UM slappie in the legislature would move to protect the flagship state univ..harbaugh will get a show cause, as will stallions..they will pay a few million in fines and will get probation..asu got a bowl ban because they self imposed, UM will not do that...
cfp is a separate entity with competing interests, they are not beholden to the ncaa...they "could" follow a request from the ncaa, but they did just name warde manuel as the next chairman of the cfp committee..do you think the UM AD will move to ban his own team?..
You misunderstand. The CFP *could* absolutely invite a team with a post-season ban (in the same way the Duke's Mayo Bowl could).
This is extremely wishful thinking on your part.
No, I heard it on the radio that 11 Warriors was reporting. Read my thread title. And I didn't say it was factual. Simply something I heard on the radio. Like you, I had no idea at the time what 11 Warriors source was but we see in the article they're sighting a source who is also speculating.
