And misspelling Delany's name, ironically enough.Herbie wearing the Great Pumpkin suit.
He is biased....everyone is biased. It's human nature.Shocking another idiot responded back saying he was biased...where have I heard that before...sigh
He is biased....everyone is biased. It's human nature.
Sorry, even you can't change human nature. As long as networks hire former athletes or college graduates, they're going to have a bias. Or even if they grew up following a certain team. Then they get to know certain players and coaches and they have a bias toward them as well. It's absolutely unavoidable. That doesn't mean they can't do their job in a professional manner, but they still have biases.Completely disagree
Sorry, even you can't change human nature. As long as networks hire former athletes or college graduates, they're going to have a bias. Or even if they grew up following a certain team. Then they get to know certain players and coaches and they have a bias toward them as well. It's absolutely unavoidable. That doesn't mean they can't do their job in a professional manner, but they still have biases.
Tweeting for a certain conference to pour it on is hardly unbiased. You're right, he's about as unbiased as you are.Again--we disagree. Evaluations should be and can be made without any bias. That's what Herbie does. That's what I do. Which is why the fan base that we're most connected with is going to attack us the most because they want us to see things through their eyes.
Kirk is the least biased person in the industry--has been for years. Blackledge isn't far behind. You can love a program or a coach and remain unbiased. By definition bias causes you to be unfair in an evaluation. Herbie isn't.
By definition bias causes you to be unfair in an evaluation. Herbie isn't.
Tweeting for a certain conference to pour it on is hardly unbiased. You're right, he's about as unbiased as you are.
You mean the announcer that was part of a recruiting violation? Nah, no bias there.Shocking another idiot responded back saying he was biased...where have I heard that before...sigh
You mean the announcer that was part of a recruiting violation? Nah, no bias there.
You just get dumber every day.Sigh...let me know when Trace wins the Heisman next year and Miles makes us forget Barkley ever existed. And I'm sure the two players that replace them will be even better.
Again--we disagree. Evaluations should be and can be made without any bias. That's what Herbie does. That's what I do. Which is why the fan base that we're most connected with is going to attack us the most because they want us to see things through their eyes.
Kirk is the least biased person in the industry--has been for years. Blackledge isn't far behind. You can love a program or a coach and remain unbiased. By definition bias causes you to be unfair in an evaluation. Herbie isn't.
You just get dumber every day.
Man, are you naive.They brought a kid on stage. And that helped us. It isn't that he was telling him to go to Ohio State. Read the violation. If anything we should be thanking Herbie for that
His comments benefit OSU.Shocking another idiot responded back saying he was biased...where have I heard that before...sigh
He is biased....everyone is biased. It's human nature.
First of all, I said the offense can still be just as good without Barkley because teams won't be focusing on stopping him and that will loosen up our running game. I never said Sanders would make us forget Barkley like you said I did. Secondly, I never said Trace would be the Heisman favorite. I said he would be a Heisman candidate and will certainly be in the discussion. I've also said many times, and if you would ever actually read what someone posts instead of firing back gibberish, that Barkley would not win the Heisman (I said this from the start of the season) because he plays for Penn State and he would get screwed just like many others have. So Trace will not win the Heisman even if he deserves it because he plays for Penn State.Right...you never said anything about our offense being better next year without Barkley (Gesicki & Hamilton) or attacked me for saying Trace isn't the Heisman favorite. Look at you attacking again because you can't argue what was stated. Always attacking when someone has a different opinion. It's sad..so sad.
Sigh...let me know when Trace wins the Heisman next year and Miles makes us forget Barkley ever existed. And I'm sure the two players that replace them will be even better.
First of all, I said the offense can still be just as good without Barkley because teams won't be focusing on stopping him and that will loosen up our running game. I never said Sanders would make us forget Barkley like you said I did. Secondly, I never said Trace would be the Heisman favorite. I said he would be a Heisman candidate and will certainly be in the discussion. I've also said many times, and if you would ever actually read what someone posts instead of firing back gibberish, that Barkley would not win the Heisman (I said this from the start of the season) because he plays for Penn State and he would get screwed just like many others have. So Trace will not win the Heisman even if he deserves it because he plays for Penn State.
Any other ignorant comments you would like to post? I'm sure you have us going 7-5 next year because you're just so unbiased.
January 1 and we have a nomination for the dumbest post of the year already.
Good job, 78 - way to get ahead of the curve.
That's an eye opener for New Year's Day for sure.Herbie wearing the Great Pumpkin suit.
That's an eye opener for New Year's Day for sure.
Did Herbie really say "Get the F out of here" in a tweet?
The king of backhanded compliments strikes again. 10-2 because of a weak schedule. Sorry dude, there is no weak schedule in the Big East and throw in Wiscy. That's not unbiased, that's stupidity.10-2 next year because of the schedule. Another horribly weak non-conference schedule and all but one tough conference game is at home. Could win 11. Could stumble and only win 8 or 9.
Go back and re-read the thread about McSorley being the Heisman favorite and asked yourself when you started to attack--it's obvious.
Defenses will still take away the run game--that's proven to be the only way to slow down the scheme. The difference is Miles doesn't have Saquon's ability to go the distance every time he touches it.
Herbie believed Ohio State was more deserving than Penn State last year and he was 100% right--that's why so many here hate him. If this board would but their bias aside and see that we could have real conversations instead of just hyping Penn State
And the dumb get dumber. Do you even read what others post or just operate in your own fantasy world? Here, let me spell it out for you....TRACE WILL NOT BE THE HEISMAN FAVORITE NEXT YEAR! Does that get it through your head?I'm not the one pretending Trace is a mortal lock for the Heisman and, if he doesn't win, it's because of anti-Penn State bias or that our offense will be better without Saquon.
The king of backhanded compliments strikes again. 10-2 because of a weak schedule. Sorry dude, there is no weak schedule in the Big East and throw in Wiscy. That's not unbiased, that's stupidity.
And defenses were not successful against us, so why would they stick with the same plan? The only team that didn't focus on Barkley was Iowa and they almost beat us. Teams will not sell out to focus on Sanders like they did Barkley.
And why would we hype Penn State on a Penn State message board? How silly of us.
He doesn't have the balls to tell anyone what his previous handle was. I'm still saying LionRevival.Is 78 the artist formerly known as Gums?
And the dumb get dumber. Do you even read what others post or just operate in your own fantasy world? Here, let me spell it out for you....TRACE WILL NOT BE THE HEISMAN FAVORITE NEXT YEAR! Does that get it through your head?