Not sure that I am the first to say it but I want to be on record. Lacking leg strength and athleticism. Doesn’t have the Tom Brady arm for a pocket guy. Cleveland may get yet another bust
Not sure that I am the first to say it but I want to be on record. Lacking leg strength and athleticism. Doesn’t have the Tom Brady arm for a pocket guy. Cleveland may get yet another bust
without taking an official survey, my guess is that these people disagree with you:Gee, whose opinion do I trust more?? Anonymous message board guy or NFL coaches/scouts.
This is a tough one.
without taking an official survey, my guess is that these people disagree with you:
The same was said about last couple of year's crop of QB's.People think it's him being sly, but I take Sean Payton at face value when he says there are no franchise QBs in this draft.
They, USC, graduated a ton of talent after the Rose Bowl. Adoree Jackson (who sometimes played on offense) and Juju Smith Schuster to name two. They also lost three OL (one drafter in the 4th round).Great point, Obli. Darnold looked like the most accurate QB in history during the 2nd half of the Rose Bowl. I was surprised that he (apparently) took a step back this year (I didn't watch USC much).
Great point, Obli. Darnold looked like the most accurate QB in history during the 2nd half of the Rose Bowl. I was surprised that he (apparently) took a step back this year (I didn't watch USC much).
There is a ton of analytics that NFL has access to. There are tons of exceptions but QB's taken early tend to pan out more than QB's taken late. The Browns employ one of the "Moneyball" (movie) guys (Paul DePodesta). He won't give the details but factors in the draft position, skill set, cost and value to organizations mathematically. He has an awesome track record doing this in baseball (hence, the movie).Chasing QBs is NFL folly. I would take Barkley and not think twice about it.
Didn't he also lose 3 starting members of the OL, a RB and a really, really good WR that tore it up for the Steelers?
Thats my guess as to why he took a step back.
This is based off of his season, I didn't see his workouts but I've heard people say he wasn't very accurate, then again it was raining when
he did it. sooo....
Please, let's not cry poor mouth for USC. Even with those losses, they still had a ton more talent than most of the teams on their schedule. Their RB had over 1500 yds and 19TDs. The RB and two WRs were invited to this years combine.
well, lets be fair here.Please, let's not cry poor mouth for USC. Even with those losses, they still had a ton more talent than most of the teams on their schedule. Their RB had over 1500 yds and 19TDs. The RB and two WRs were invited to this years combine.
The same was said about last couple of year's crop of QB's.
2017
2016
- Deshaun Watson, 12th
- Mahomes, 10th
- Kizer, 52nd
- Trubisky, 2nd
Fact is, nobody knows. Of the players above, all of them but Goff were passed over by someone. Wentz was considered a project since he played at a small school, Prescott (perhaps the best of the last two years) went in the 4th round. Last year, Watson was considered a runner and not a passer.
- Goff
- Wentz
- Lynch
- Hackenberg
- Brissett
- Cook
- Prescott
bottom line is the browns have got to take a QB. Its a matter of taking the best of the lot and then hoping you and he can develop him.
There is a ton of analytics that NFL has access to. There are tons of exceptions but QB's taken early tend to pan out more than QB's taken late. The Browns employ one of the "Moneyball" (movie) guys (Paul DePodesta). He won't give the details but factors in the draft position, skill set, cost and value to organizations mathematically. He has an awesome track record doing this in baseball (hence, the movie).
Its not often a team wins the SB with an average or inferior QB. So, that is the goal..
all true...but one can always look at players like Brady and Wilson. drafting a QB is not foolproof but the analytics show that the probability is that you'll get a better one early. And were the Browns are, they simply have to take a QB with 1 or 4. They'd be laughed out of town if they don't.Goff and Wentz have looked like franchise guys. I don't think Prescott is. He is very solid, kind of an Alex Smith type. Watson flashed but you need to see him for a little longer. None of the others listed can be called franchise QB's yet.
All that said teams will chase QB's as they always do.
It’s a tough call this year. Rosen and Darnold were very good in the college game (generally) but you never know how that translates to the NFL. Nobody wants the drama or notoriety of taking the next Ryan Leaf. Having the UCLA coach making less than stellar comments on Rosen appears to have lowered his standing with a few teams/ draft predictors.
It will be interesting to look back 5-6 years from now and see where Darnold and Rosen stand in the NFL compared to expectations from now.
Unitis, Brady, Wilson, Starr, Staubach, Montana, Brees, Warner, Favre, Theisman, Stabler, disagree with them!except Joe Namath, Jim Plunkett, Ken Stabler, Joe Theisman, Jim Mc Mahon, Doug Williams, Jeff Hostetler, Mark Rypion, Trent Dilfer,Brad Johnson, Joe Flacco, and Nick Foles all disagree with you!!
With the first overall pick in the draft, the Cleveland Browns pick Sidd Finch, right handed pitcher from Harvard.He has an awesome track record doing this in baseball
They are drafting Finch for linebacker.With the first overall pick in the draft, the Cleveland Browns pick Sidd Finch, right handed pitcher from Harvard.
Not sure that I am the first to say it but I want to be on record. Lacking leg strength and athleticism. Doesn’t have the Tom Brady arm for a pocket guy. Cleveland may get yet another bust
we are debating in Snake and JoeyT are above average QB's, I believe.Unitis, Brady, Wilson, Starr, Staubach, Montana, Brees, Warner, Favre, Theisman, Stabler, disagree with them!
He had a great game for sure....what was most painful was how he could avoid the rush, and get off an accurate throw at the last second.He looked like Pro material against us in the rose bowl. but that's all I have to go on.
He had a great game for sure....what was most painful was how he could avoid the rush, and get off an accurate throw at the last second.
Obli,The same was said about last couple of year's crop of QB's.
2017
2016
- Deshaun Watson, 12th
- Mahomes, 10th
- Kizer, 52nd
- Trubisky, 2nd
Fact is, nobody knows. Of the players above, all of them but Goff were passed over by someone. Wentz was considered a project since he played at a small school, Prescott (perhaps the best of the last two years) went in the 4th round. Last year, Watson was considered a runner and not a passer.
- Goff
- Wentz
- Lynch
- Hackenberg
- Brissett
- Cook
- Prescott
bottom line is the browns have got to take a QB. Its a matter of taking the best of the lot and then hoping you and he can develop him.
There is a ton of analytics that NFL has access to. There are tons of exceptions but QB's taken early tend to pan out more than QB's taken late. The Browns employ one of the "Moneyball" (movie) guys (Paul DePodesta). He won't give the details but factors in the draft position, skill set, cost and value to organizations mathematically. He has an awesome track record doing this in baseball (hence, the movie).
Its not often a team wins the SB with an average or inferior QB. So, that is the goal.
IMHO, the Browns only have one of two choices: draft a QB #1 or, thinking that there are at least four QB's that are closely bunched together in potential, draft someone else #1 and a QB fourth.
They traded him to GB for a CB. Then they signed the QB from the Bills. Word is that he is a great athlete that isn't QB material unless there is a few years of sitting the bench maturing. Browns don't have time for that, GB does.Obli,
What's the story on Kizer. Complete bust? I thought he was injured.
I think that's right...and Dorsey was brought in to solve the QB problem....drafting a RB and DE isn't going to get it done for where the Browns areI would guess that holds true across all positions. Guys drafted higher tend to be better than guys drafted later. The difference is that missing on a QB sets a team back for a longer period of time than missing on a running back.
And thinking about it, who have been the QBs they have won the last 20 Super Bowls? Brady (late in the draft), Roethlisberger (later first round), Eli Manning (early first), Peyton Manning (early first) Nick Foles (third round), Brees (2nd round), Rodgers (late 1st), Flacco (middle 1st), Russell Wilson (3rd round).
I would take Barkley and worry about a QB later.
He had a great game for sure....what was most painful was how he could avoid the rush, and get off an accurate throw at the last second.
Joe Namath is in the Hall of Fame and was NOT an average QB. He had bad knees and played on some bad teams, but was as superb a competitor as anyone. And he had the best release of anyone I've ever watched. He could flick it from his ear 60 yards with accuracy. The only other QB that threw the ball with the same release he had was Dan Marino. You can believe it or not. He's also the 1st professional QB to ever throw for over 4,000 yards in a season. It was a 14 game season then too.except Joe Namath, Jim Plunkett, Ken Stabler, Joe Theisman, Jim Mc Mahon, Doug Williams, Jeff Hostetler, Mark Rypion, Trent Dilfer,Brad Johnson, Joe Flacco, and Nick Foles all disagree with you!!
That is exactly were I am. As someone in the local radio said "darnold has the highest floor, Allen the highest ceiling".I'm not sold on any of the 4 but Darnold's the one most likely to be a star IMO. I think the Browns take Allen at 1 anyone so Darnold, if he is bust, will be the problem for the Jets
There is a ton of analytics that NFL has access to. There are tons of exceptions but QB's taken early tend to pan out more than QB's taken late. The Browns employ one of the "Moneyball" (movie) guys (Paul DePodesta). He won't give the details but factors in the draft position, skill set, cost and value to organizations mathematically. He has an awesome track record doing this in baseball (hence, the movie).
Its not often a team wins the SB with an average or inferior QB. So, that is the goal.
IMHO, the Browns only have one of two choices: draft a QB #1 or, thinking that there are at least four QB's that are closely bunched together in potential, draft someone else #1 and a QB fourth.
I would guess that holds true across all positions. Guys drafted higher tend to be better than guys drafted later. The difference is that missing on a QB sets a team back for a longer period of time than missing on a running back.
And thinking about it, who have been the QBs that have won the last 20 Super Bowls? Brady (late in the draft), Roethlisberger (later first round), Eli Manning (early first), Peyton Manning (early first) Nick Foles (third round), Brees (2nd round), Rodgers (late 1st), Flacco (middle 1st), Russell Wilson (3rd round).
I would take Barkley and worry about a QB later.