Iowa’s defense was going to have to do what they hope never do which is take risks. They rely on impatient offense. Northwestern gives Iowa problems because they are patient enough to take the under routes. It always amazes me that people view a pick six or other game changing play as a huge part of the game, but a key injury is an excuse. Both are major impact plays.
The fact that we were up 17-3 when Clifford got hurt WITH having thrown 2 INTs, including one deep in our own territory, pretty much says everything there is to say about the impact of Clifford's injury.
This is different than had Clifford been injured prior to the game and us saying "boy, you're lucky Clifford was out or we would have whipped you!" Here, we have a quarter and a half of actual empirical evidence on which to base our belief that this game turns out very differently with Clifford at QB for the entire game. Yes, it's still a supposition. But it's a supposition based on observable evidence.
Last edited: