Zig's filmed interview with Jeff was 3/10/2014. Some of these charges date to 3/1/2013. I've been told Zig has a nearly perfect BS detector.
It just doesn't make any sense.
I hope this drives Zig under the nearest rock but I won't bet on it.
Zig's filmed interview with Jeff was 3/10/2014. Some of these charges date to 3/1/2013. I've been told Zig has a nearly perfect BS detector.
It just doesn't make any sense.
For everyone other than the most self righteous, I think we can agree that we would categorize texting a teenage girl and asking for nude pics as bad, but nowhere near as bad as raping a child. Can we agree on that?
My point here is that the media will undoubtedly make the headline as inflammatory as possible (sound familiar, readers of the Sandusky Grand Jury Presentment?) and link this whole story to the "Penn State culture." Texting a teenage girl doesn't sound as bad as raping a child, so we will get headlines like, "Ex Penn State coach Sandusky's son charged with sexually assaulting a child".
For everyone other than the most self righteous, I think we can agree that we would categorize texting a teenage girl and asking for nude pics as bad, but nowhere near as bad as raping a child. Can we agree on that?
Wtf are you talking about?? Not one person in this thread is condoning his behavior. There are people pointing out the misreporting and trying to clarify facts, you can't conflate that with people condoning something.
Heaven forbid we actually sort out fact from fiction re: what he was charged with! He's going down due to the texts and I have no problem with that.
Differently? No. What he did was terrible. However, if we found out that was the case it could go a long way to understanding the why behind these crimes. There is no "one size fits all" for the terrible people in our society, and there is probably no way to ever eliminate these from every happening again to anyone ever, but I still think it's important to understand why these things happen, even if they don't excuse them.
It doesn't matter to me. The guy is still charged with sexual abuse of a minor. I don't care what he did he still had unwarranted sexual contact with a minor. Sicko who needs locked up forever. His apologist need to go to jail with him.
as mentioned, go to the MSN home page, it's there alreadyMSNBC just ran with it. Had a picture of Jeffrey's mug shot. Won't be long till we see Jerry being marched off in cuffs in his jump suit.
You sound like a closet pedophile who is trying too hard to show everyone that you are not a pedophile. Your over the top righteous indignation rings hollow.
as mentioned, go to the MSN home page, it's there already
Right. That's why I was for Sandusky getting death penalty.
Sorry about your Hero and his adopted son.
He nailed you, Nate. Thou dost protest too much, methinks
^^^ Quiet, brain surgeon at work ^^^Read the court documents..
And there are about 5-8 people on here already sticking up for this dirt bag. I hope these people don't have young kids, if they do, they probably need to be looked into. Apple doesn't fall far from the tree in these situations. They all stick up for one another.
So do I now have to deal with the Jeffrey defenders as well as the Jerry ones? Or are some of those lost souls ready to accept reality and move on with their lives?
Prison guardWhere did Jeffrey work? Tell me it wasn't a local Government job. That would be the cherry on the cake.
It doesn't matter to me. The guy is still charged with sexual abuse of a minor. I don't care what he did he still had unwarranted sexual contact with a minor. Sicko who needs locked up forever. His apologist need to go to jail with him.
I think we have learned that "facts" are only what we want them to be.
its the pic on the home page of www.collegefootballtalk.com as wellThanks. Never a doubt, eventually.
So are you on Jeff's side?YOU don't have to deal with either. As far as I know there is no one forcing you to read this board. Is there??
Fvcking idiot!
So are you on Jeff's side?
Look, we get it, you're trying to compete for the person who's most outraged over these allegations. We're all equally outraged however before one can be outraged they need to first find out exactly what to be out raged about and you apparently never completed that first step, since you still think he is accused of sexual contact. He was accused of trying to get sexual contact aka soliciting. If you aren't bright enough to understand English and see the difference between the two then that's on you.
Again, both are illegal and bad but they are not one in the same.
Congrats to you then. Have fun with that.If he thinks you're a fvcking idiot, then yeah I agree with him.
its the pic on the home page of www.collegefootballtalk.com as well
It's on CNN. It's on ABC news. It's on CBS News. It's on Fox News.The guy that runs that site is an insufferable Joe basher. I think he may have cried actual tears when the whole "Joe Paterno tribute" story came out before the Temple game. He probably couldn't wait to put that picture up today.
No your not, like Jerry, you think he should be walking the streets..
It's on CNN. It's on ABC news. It's on CBS News. It's on Fox News.
It's national news.
It's on CNN. It's on ABC news. It's on CBS News. It's on Fox News.
It's national news.
Nate makes a loaf of bread look "sharp"Nate's not the brightest bulb.