ADVERTISEMENT

Joe Paterno legacy forever stained by sins of omission

interrobang

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Aug 21, 2016
34,601
56,208
1
This guy and another Orlando writer have written Dan Bernstein-esque columns from the start

George Diaz
Reporter
Orlando Sentinel


Joe didn’t know. Joe passed the information along to his superiors. Joe isn’t the monster; it’s Jerry Sandusky. Joe helped thousands of student-athletes, therefore he could not have harbored a child molester.

Rinse and repeat, in the hopes that somebody will buy what Joe Paterno’s loyal soldiers are selling.

It’s their standard response to the Penn State child-abuse scandal, which took on another newsy twist at the sentencing hearing for three former school officials who will do time for their crimes.

Graham Spanier, the ex-college president. will serve four to 12 months in prison and two years of probation. Gary Schultz, former vice president, will serve a jail term of six to 23 months and probation. Tim Curley, the former athletic director, will serve seven to 23 months.

They are guilty in their complicity for not stopping the rapes of children on the Penn State campus. And they can rot in prison forevermore along with Sandusky for all I care. Paterno is dead, and no doubt the ghosts of justice have been rattled once again.

Joe Paterno will never be able to shake the eternal sting of harboring a child molester, whether it was through blissful ignorance or willful negligence.

It’s all right there in the special investigative report from former FBI director Louis Freeh, whose team’s work documented the first signs of scandal dating to 1999. Paterno, Schultz, Curley and Spanier were made aware of an incident involving Sandusky allegedly performing sex acts on an 11-year-old boy in the shower stalls of the Nittany Lions football locker room. Authorities did not press charges.

Joe Pa then gave Sandusky office space on Penn State’s main campus, with a really cool job title: Volunteer Position Director — Positive Action for Youth.


Is that what they’re calling child rapists these days?

But Sandusky’s sexual abuse goes as far back as 1971 when a 15-year-old boy was raped. He said he reported the attack to Paterno and another Penn State official. Then last year, a day after CNN broke that story, Penn State acknowledged that it had paid a settlement to a victim.

"I'd be willing to sit on a witness stand and confront Joe Paterno," the victim told CNN. "Unfortunately he died and I didn't get to."

But, hey, Joe did everything he could.

Judge John Boccabella certainly isn’t buying any of it, either.

“Why no one made a phone call to police is beyond me,” Boccabella said during the sentencing. “Why Mr. Sandusky was allowed to continue to use the Penn State facilities is beyond me. Mr. Paterno, the legendary football coach, could have made that phone call without so much as getting his hands dirty.”

The phone call would have come from the most powerful man in Pennsylvania. Not the governor. Not the university president. Not the athletic director.

Paterno was the most powerful force in all the land because of all the other things he did, many of them deserving of praise and platitudes. He was not only a great football coach but a great molder of young men. He donated millions to help build an on-campus library and at least $1 million for a campus interfaith spiritual center.

To this day, almost to a man, his former players support him unequivocally. Good men like Michael Timpson and Mike McBath.

Joe was a solid role model and father-figure to them and so many others, and therefore he was incapable of being complicit in Sandusky’s sex scandal. But all the stories, all the documents, all the testimony, and all the pain says otherwise.

Maybe Paterno was naïve, as some suggest, and brushed it off as “horseplay.” Maybe he got caught up in how this would destroy his legacy, as well as the stain it would leave on Penn State. Maybe he just didn’t want to know.

But through it all, unspeakable sins were committed on children. Atrocities. And Penn State took a page out of the Catholic Church pedophile priest playbook and tried to bury those sins.

There are at least 32 victims over the years. Those children will be forever scarred.

But so will Paterno’s legacy — forevermore — no matter how much his supporters scream in defiance.

I hope the victims and their families find some comfort in that.
 
A few things in play there:

hindsight bias
ignoring the proper procedures in reporting such incidents (Joe was not the witness!!)
self-righteous trashing of a better man than the author



Very small, insignificant losers obviously get some perverse version of self esteem from this type of revisionist conjuring of reality drawing attention to their tiny selves. Ho-hum! Yawn!
 
  • Like
Reactions: N&B4PSU
It somehow gets lost in all of this that Joe was a football coach. If the professionals were fooled, why is there an expectation that a 80+ year old man who devoted his life to sports should be equipped to do so.

I'm a physician. I'm a mandated reporter. I have training. Joe did not. He acted inadequately but not illegally, maybe not even immorally. He did something about it, he forwarded it as he thought was appropriate. Maybe he should have called the police directly. I'd like to think most people would have but in actuality, most people don't step outside of the lines for acts of heroism, let alone many 80+ year olds.

I can guarantee you something: with 20+ victims there are many people in this story who are more culpable than JoePa. They just didn't have the admiration of a whole community, the reputation of doing the right things for the right reasons... it's fun to tear down things that others have built. And that's what the sports-media-complex accomplished. Awesome job.
 
I mean this is really just a regurgitation of the existing narrative and opinions that already exist nationally. Most people outside of the Penn State community feel and think as the author does. Just playing to that crowd. Time to move on and win another Big Ten Title.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jerademan74
This article is so void of facts its sick.I agree with the previous post win baby win and stick it to them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zoltan01
"Joe Pa then gave Sandusky office space on Penn State’s main campus, with a really cool job title: Volunteer Position Director — Positive Action for Youth."

WOW! When did JVP do that? I swore I read where JVP nixed any idea at all of Sandusky being on campus. I KNOW I read in the Freeh report where JVP absolutely said no way to kids on campus. The MOST POWERFUL MAN ON CAMPUS was turned down by a guy who would become university president and has a building named after him. This dude is a freaking moron.
 
Unfortunately you have to be a subscriber to comment. Though the guy's twitter handle is @GeorgeDiaz
 
What a god damn stupid fvck George Diaz is.
I know it won't do any good but I was able to send a reply to his email address by using my cell phone. By touching the "reporter" under his name (in the original post of this thread) it gave a direct access to his email address. I know that this effort was most likely a complete waste of time and effort... but it sure made me feel better after I sent it. The amount of ignorance regarding this case is truly sad.... but I doubt that anything will change in the foreseeable future
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206
Right, let's live in our own little bubble and ignore the fact there's still a lot of evangelism that needs done that none of PSU's leaders are doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: humpydudas19
The guy who witnessed it should have called the cops. Not have been a big puss and went to Joe. Joe tells his bosses. If someone told me they "saw something", I probably wouldn't call either but make sure someone did.

Joe should have hounded the guy who witnessed it to call the cops.

Why Sundusky was allowed around campus with kids is beyond me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AJ65
The guy who witnessed it should have called the cops. Not have been a big puss and went to Joe. Joe tells his bosses. If someone told me they "saw something", I probably wouldn't call either but make sure someone did.

Joe should have hounded the guy who witnessed it to call the cops.

Why Sundusky was allowed around campus with kids is beyond me.

The entire root of everything is that....

McQuery didn't tell anyone much of anything. That fact is missed by everyone who wants this to be a Penn state/Joe Paterno enabler issue. It is not. McQ simply did not give anyone any reason to stick his nose in the phone and tell him to call.

Based upon what was conveyed by McQ, there was not a need to immediately call police. Then actions of at least six people support that view, including the ear-witness.
 
The McQuearys even discussed calling 911, and didn't feel it was worthy of calling.
 
For me I would LOVE if all the posts that deal with this "TRASH TOPIC" were moved to the test board. It is the place for such to die. We would be better served to STOP the dialog at every level.
I generally do not post on these threads any longer, sick and tired !!!!!
 
This guy and another Orlando writer have written Dan Bernstein-esque columns from the start

George Diaz
Reporter
Orlando Sentinel


Joe didn’t know. Joe passed the information along to his superiors. Joe isn’t the monster; it’s Jerry Sandusky. Joe helped thousands of student-athletes, therefore he could not have harbored a child molester.

Rinse and repeat, in the hopes that somebody will buy what Joe Paterno’s loyal soldiers are selling.

It’s their standard response to the Penn State child-abuse scandal, which took on another newsy twist at the sentencing hearing for three former school officials who will do time for their crimes.

Graham Spanier, the ex-college president. will serve four to 12 months in prison and two years of probation. Gary Schultz, former vice president, will serve a jail term of six to 23 months and probation. Tim Curley, the former athletic director, will serve seven to 23 months.

They are guilty in their complicity for not stopping the rapes of children on the Penn State campus. And they can rot in prison forevermore along with Sandusky for all I care. Paterno is dead, and no doubt the ghosts of justice have been rattled once again.

Joe Paterno will never be able to shake the eternal sting of harboring a child molester, whether it was through blissful ignorance or willful negligence.

It’s all right there in the special investigative report from former FBI director Louis Freeh, whose team’s work documented the first signs of scandal dating to 1999. Paterno, Schultz, Curley and Spanier were made aware of an incident involving Sandusky allegedly performing sex acts on an 11-year-old boy in the shower stalls of the Nittany Lions football locker room. Authorities did not press charges.

Joe Pa then gave Sandusky office space on Penn State’s main campus, with a really cool job title: Volunteer Position Director — Positive Action for Youth.


Is that what they’re calling child rapists these days?

But Sandusky’s sexual abuse goes as far back as 1971 when a 15-year-old boy was raped. He said he reported the attack to Paterno and another Penn State official. Then last year, a day after CNN broke that story, Penn State acknowledged that it had paid a settlement to a victim.

"I'd be willing to sit on a witness stand and confront Joe Paterno," the victim told CNN. "Unfortunately he died and I didn't get to."

But, hey, Joe did everything he could.

Judge John Boccabella certainly isn’t buying any of it, either.

“Why no one made a phone call to police is beyond me,” Boccabella said during the sentencing. “Why Mr. Sandusky was allowed to continue to use the Penn State facilities is beyond me. Mr. Paterno, the legendary football coach, could have made that phone call without so much as getting his hands dirty.”

The phone call would have come from the most powerful man in Pennsylvania. Not the governor. Not the university president. Not the athletic director.

Paterno was the most powerful force in all the land because of all the other things he did, many of them deserving of praise and platitudes. He was not only a great football coach but a great molder of young men. He donated millions to help build an on-campus library and at least $1 million for a campus interfaith spiritual center.

To this day, almost to a man, his former players support him unequivocally. Good men like Michael Timpson and Mike McBath.

Joe was a solid role model and father-figure to them and so many others, and therefore he was incapable of being complicit in Sandusky’s sex scandal. But all the stories, all the documents, all the testimony, and all the pain says otherwise.

Maybe Paterno was naïve, as some suggest, and brushed it off as “horseplay.” Maybe he got caught up in how this would destroy his legacy, as well as the stain it would leave on Penn State. Maybe he just didn’t want to know.

But through it all, unspeakable sins were committed on children. Atrocities. And Penn State took a page out of the Catholic Church pedophile priest playbook and tried to bury those sins.

There are at least 32 victims over the years. Those children will be forever scarred.

But so will Paterno’s legacy — forevermore — no matter how much his supporters scream in defiance.

I hope the victims and their families find some comfort in that.
My advice to you is to read less of these negative articles, and watch more of our football games. It will make you feel better. The past is the past, and we can't control how the general public feels about the JS horrors. Yes, it was a terrible story that was perpetuated by the gutless BOTs firing Joe and taking ridiculous other actions to protect their own hides. Let's move on as this hasn't lessened OUR love for Penn State. Enjoy the current ride as we deserve it, and I'm sure Joe Paterno would agree with this position! Don't let his death be in vain!
 
I actually wrote a response to Diaz and got a response from him. We will see where this leads... but I don't expect him to do even the most basic investigation. I have copied our dialogue below. I know that it is probably much easier to just let journalists such as Diaz continue to write half-ass articles... but somehow I feel better for at least trying to stop the false narrative, etc.

My initial resonse:

> Subject: Regarding: "Joe Paterno legacy forever stained by sins of omission"
>
> I have long since become weary of reading articles such as yours that misrepresent the actual facts of this case. Why don't you actually take the time and exert the effort to separate facts from fiction before writing an article like this. You are wrong with regard to many of your statements. It is infuriating to those of us who have actually taken the time and effort to sift through all of the actual facts in order to understand what actually transpired to allow Sandusky to do what he did. As one example.. Paterno had nothing to do with Sandusky getting emeritus status when he retired in 1999. That status is what allowed Sandusky to have continued access to the athletic facilities even after his retirement. Paterno was actually unhappy about it but was unable to stop it. Sandusky was retired and not part of Paterno's official or unofficial staff. Just one of the many misrepresentations in your article. I would be happy to further "educate" you as to the actual facts regarding your misinformed article but I'm sure that it would be nothing more than a waste of time and effort since you obviously have decided to remain ignorant. I don't expect any response since I'm sure you aren't really concerned about the actual facts of this case. Much easier and popular to carry on and promote the misinformed false narrative regarding this whole situation. Here's a novel idea... why not research your topic before making stupid uninformed allegations.

His response:

>On Jun 5, 2017, at 9:34 AM, Diaz, George <GDiaz@orlandosentinel.com> wrote:
>
> There is a common thread here...people who aren't blinded by loyalty and Joe Paterno/Penn State loyalists who are in fact more guilty of embracing false narratives than the rest of the American public.
> Sincerely
> George

My final response:

fbh1 to Diaz, Georgeshow details
space.gif


The difference is that I am ready to back my argument up with actual facts. Using the Freeh Report as the basis of anything shows me that you are willing to accept opinion as fact. You do realize that Freeh's own attorney admitted his report was nothing more than Freeh's opinions and therefore he shouldn't be held accountable for potential liablity. This was done in a court filing in his response to Spanier's ongoing defamation law suit. Why don't you take the time and effort to read the recently released report by FIS Special Agent John Snedden. Snedden is the NCIS agent that was assigned (in 2012) by the US Federal government to investigate Spanier with regard to continuing his security clearance. I'll make it easy for you to find: Ralph Cipriano wrote an article about it for BigTrial. Net. Snedden essentially refutes most of the allegations regarding this case. I dare you to take the time and effort to check it out. If you know anything about on-the-job NCIS agents .. you will certainly understand the level of creditability Mr. Snedden has compared to Louis Freeh... especially when Freeh's own attorney has publicly admitted that The Freeh Report is nothing more than Freeh's opinion. Please answer me using facts... I guarantee you that I am not "blinded by loyalty for Joe". There have been many injustices associated with this case... one of those is the continued false narrative perpetrated by misinformed journalist such as yourself. I'll bet you were one of the many that jumped all over the infamous Duke Lacrosse scandal before it was finally debunked. Do yourself a favor... check out Snedden's investigation. Maybe you will learn something.

Sent from my iPhone
 
The entire root of everything is that....

McQuery didn't tell anyone much of anything. That fact is missed by everyone who wants this to be a Penn state/Joe Paterno enabler issue. It is not. McQ simply did not give anyone any reason to stick his nose in the phone and tell him to call.

Based upon what was conveyed by McQ, there was not a need to immediately call police. Then actions of at least six people support that view, including the ear-witness.

This is a bit lengthy and long-winded but...

Here is the main issue with that belief. It was important enough for him to run home and tell papa, and then be told to call Paterno, then visit Paterno. It was important enough for Paterno to tell his superiors. I can certainly understand your statement but the reality is it didn't matter if McQ didn't originally state how sexual it was--this man was in the shower with a young boy naked and McQ was clearly rattled enough about it to raise the issue (and NO that doesn't absolve him from being the first to handle the situation then and there). And it is incredulous and reprehensible that no one thought enough to find out who this kid in the shower was. This does not require a "trained" eye to know it's not cool!! You oversee a University, you do your damn job to protect the people on its campus, including visitors, and especially minors.

I gave these men the benefit of the doubt hoping that the trial would be their opportunity to reveal something that to convince me they did actually do everything they should have and, unfortunately, I didn't get that. What I got were men who were trying to solve a situation by getting it off their plate instead of making sure it was handled properly. Raykovitz is not child protective services people!
I also tend to think that if it was someone unknown to these administrators in that shower with a kid it would have been handled the way it should have been in the first place.

Let's lose the excuses for C/S/S. These men f'd up, period. Their trial may not have been completely fair, the judge's sentencing may not have been completely fair, and the media has not been fair at all, but that doesn't absolve them from being held accountable for what they failed to do.

Imagine if Curley took responsibility for the decision not to call DPW 6 years ago and admitted that Paterno played no part in that decision (thus clearing up the email speculation) or if Schultz took responsibility and admitted that PSU attorney Courtney advised him to call child services and he went along with Curley's decision not to. Let's be clear, they didn't care about saving the school's reputation or Paterno's reputation, or the alumni's reputation, they cared about saving themselves. Paterno may have deserved the benefit of the doubt in the media based on his reputation, but C/S had the facts that could have saved it years ago, they chose not to. They did you no favors in ruining your alma mater's reputation. Same could be said of the board of trustees.
 
There is a common thread here...people who aren't blinded by loyalty and Joe Paterno/Penn State loyalists who are in fact more guilty of embracing false narratives than the rest of the American public.
> Sincerely
> George

I've heard this stupid argument from others too. The problem is that only those people who have some sort of connection to Penn St or to Joe have enough interest to follow up and do some research on the facts of the case. Ideally, we could rely on journalists to do the same, but that world doesn't exist anymore.
 
This is a bit lengthy and long-winded but...

Here is the main issue with that belief. It was important enough for him to run home and tell papa, and then be told to call Paterno, then visit Paterno. It was important enough for Paterno to tell his superiors. I can certainly understand your statement but the reality is it didn't matter if McQ didn't originally state how sexual it was--this man was in the shower with a young boy naked and McQ was clearly rattled enough about it to raise the issue (and NO that doesn't absolve him from being the first to handle the situation then and there). And it is incredulous and reprehensible that no one thought enough to find out who this kid in the shower was. This does not require a "trained" eye to know it's not cool!! You oversee a University, you do your damn job to protect the people on its campus, including visitors, and especially minors.

I gave these men the benefit of the doubt hoping that the trial would be their opportunity to reveal something that to convince me they did actually do everything they should have and, unfortunately, I didn't get that. What I got were men who were trying to solve a situation by getting it off their plate instead of making sure it was handled properly. Raykovitz is not child protective services people!
I also tend to think that if it was someone unknown to these administrators in that shower with a kid it would have been handled the way it should have been in the first place.

Let's lose the excuses for C/S/S. These men f'd up, period. Their trial may not have been completely fair, the judge's sentencing may not have been completely fair, and the media has not been fair at all, but that doesn't absolve them from being held accountable for what they failed to do.

Imagine if Curley took responsibility for the decision not to call DPW 6 years ago and admitted that Paterno played no part in that decision (thus clearing up the email speculation) or if Schultz took responsibility and admitted that PSU attorney Courtney advised him to call child services and he went along with Curley's decision not to. Let's be clear, they didn't care about saving the school's reputation or Paterno's reputation, or the alumni's reputation, they cared about saving themselves. Paterno may have deserved the benefit of the doubt in the media based on his reputation, but C/S had the facts that could have saved it years ago, they chose not to. They did you no favors in ruining your alma mater's reputation. Same could be said of the board of trustees.
100% of C/S/S's culpability depends on what McQueary told them, plain and simple. And we have no fact and no agreement on what McQueary said at that time. C/S say one thing, McQueary says another. Without supporting notes, recordings, corroboration, etc. this is an unknown and cannot be proven either way. The only possible corroboration is that both Curley and Schultz say they weren't told it was as serious as McQueary would have you believe, and Spanier also confirms that they rolled up a story that wasn't that serious. Others will say the 3 conspired to say this, and it's not really corroborated. However given the complete lack of clarity and proof as to what was said in 2001, in my mind that means reasonable doubt which means not guilty. This is why statute of limitations laws exist. This story will never be fully settled because what was said in 2001 will never be known.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206
This is a bit lengthy and long-winded but...

Here is the main issue with that belief. It was important enough for him to run home and tell papa, and then be told to call Paterno, then visit Paterno. It was important enough for Paterno to tell his superiors. I can certainly understand your statement but the reality is it didn't matter if McQ didn't originally state how sexual it was--this man was in the shower with a young boy naked and McQ was clearly rattled enough about it to raise the issue (and NO that doesn't absolve him from being the first to handle the situation then and there). And it is incredulous and reprehensible that no one thought enough to find out who this kid in the shower was. This does not require a "trained" eye to know it's not cool!! You oversee a University, you do your damn job to protect the people on its campus, including visitors, and especially minors.

I gave these men the benefit of the doubt hoping that the trial would be their opportunity to reveal something that to convince me they did actually do everything they should have and, unfortunately, I didn't get that. What I got were men who were trying to solve a situation by getting it off their plate instead of making sure it was handled properly. Raykovitz is not child protective services people!
I also tend to think that if it was someone unknown to these administrators in that shower with a kid it would have been handled the way it should have been in the first place.

Let's lose the excuses for C/S/S. These men f'd up, period. Their trial may not have been completely fair, the judge's sentencing may not have been completely fair, and the media has not been fair at all, but that doesn't absolve them from being held accountable for what they failed to do.

Imagine if Curley took responsibility for the decision not to call DPW 6 years ago and admitted that Paterno played no part in that decision (thus clearing up the email speculation) or if Schultz took responsibility and admitted that PSU attorney Courtney advised him to call child services and he went along with Curley's decision not to. Let's be clear, they didn't care about saving the school's reputation or Paterno's reputation, or the alumni's reputation, they cared about saving themselves. Paterno may have deserved the benefit of the doubt in the media based on his reputation, but C/S had the facts that could have saved it years ago, they chose not to. They did you no favors in ruining your alma mater's reputation. Same could be said of the board of trustees.

Oh please....and yet it wasn't serious/definitive enough for MM to call UPPD/CYS or for JM/Dr. D (two folks trained in how to report suspected child abuse) to have MM call UPPD or CYS that night. Instead sleep on it then tell a football coach (aka handle it as an inappropriate HR complaint not a criminal complaint). Also it wasn't serious enough for MM to give one sliver of dissatisfaction when Curely called him 4 or 5 days later to follow up with PSU's action plan of banning JS and informing TSM, a plan which didn't include UPPD coming to get Mike's statement nor JS getting arrested and questioned.....

Yep, that's makes perfect sense if MM was 99.999% sure a kid was getting raped that night as he has contented in court...as opposed to him not being sure about anything other than the shower was inappropriate/weirded him out.

In summary here is the metadata that shows what MM reported in 2001 wasn't as definitive/serious as he made it out to be 9 years later in his first written statement to the OAG/LE in general in 2010 re: 2001 incident:

1. Lack of filing a FORMAL police report/written statement to UPPD in 2001. As the one and only witness it was incumbent on him to do this if he wanted something formally done to look into JS if he felt the admins informal investigation wasn't enough.
2. MM/JM consider calling the police that night but don't, Dr. D goes on to say that what MM reported that night didn't warrant a call to UPPD/CYS
3. MM's lack of dissatisfaction with TC's action plan that didn't involve UPPD coming to get his statement and JS getting arrested. He was apparently perfectly ok with them letting TSM handle this report.
4. In Spanier's trial not one single witness produced by the state corroborated MM's version of events, that he reported a "sexual" shower in 2001.
 
They all(MM, Joe, Curley, Shultz, Spanier, and the victims) F'ed up. The limited info, rumors and whatever should have been passed on to the police. At that point PSU would have been in the clear.



The victim wanted to confront Joe. Why didn't he confront Sandusky and go to the police?

Joe never should have been involved but once he was he needed to pass the info to the police. At that point he would have been totally in the clear. The same goes for MM, Curley, Shultz, Spanier and anyone that had info, rumors or whatever. I doubt it would have prevented any abuse but PSU would have been in the clear. Until the victims go to the police nothing would have been done to Sandusky.
 
They all(MM, Joe, Curley, Shultz, Spanier, and the victims) F'ed up. The limited info, rumors and whatever should have been passed on to the police. At that point PSU would have been in the clear.

The victim wanted to confront Joe. Why didn't he confront Sandusky and go to the police?

Joe never should have been involved but once he was he needed to pass the info to the police. At that point he would have been totally in the clear. The same goes for MM, Curley, Shultz, Spanier and anyone that had info, rumors or whatever. I doubt it would have prevented any abuse but PSU would have been in the clear. Until the victims go to the police nothing would have been done to Sandusky.

This is a stupid comment, but unfortunately represents some common misperceptions. Without going through every error you make here, let's note that your "should have" or "would have" admonitions are 7 in number, from a vantage point 16 years later. The knowledge that you seem certain of now was not available to those PSU officials at the time.
 
George isn't a very curious little monkey. Screw him and the man in the yellow hat.
 
So, this is fun - let's be Penn State fans and post negative articles about Joe, so we can continue to invite knuckleheads and trolls like flies to honey.

What a great idea!


We know what Joe meant to Penn State. Who cares what people outside of the Penn State community thinks of him. Like I said. The national narrative is set in stone and nothing is changing that. Who cares! Let's win another title.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jroman1
Amazing that these writers have to lie and twist things to make their point. Keep try hanging the dead guy. Geez
His own university hung him. The university he fought to make better in every way. The university he gave 61 years of his life. Blaming others is a farce. Penn State BoT never gave him any benefit of doubt. He was tossed away like the leftovers of some takeout joint.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jroman1
This guy and another Orlando writer have written Dan Bernstein-esque columns from the start

George Diaz
Reporter
Orlando Sentinel

Joe didn’t know. Joe passed the information along to his superiors. Joe isn’t the monster; it’s Jerry Sandusky. Joe helped thousands of student-athletes, therefore he could not have harbored a child molester.

Rinse and repeat, in the hopes that somebody will buy what Joe Paterno’s loyal soldiers are selling.

It’s their standard response to the Penn State child-abuse scandal, which took on another newsy twist at the sentencing hearing for three former school officials who will do time for their crimes.

Graham Spanier, the ex-college president. will serve four to 12 months in prison and two years of probation. Gary Schultz, former vice president, will serve a jail term of six to 23 months and probation. Tim Curley, the former athletic director, will serve seven to 23 months.

They are guilty in their complicity for not stopping the rapes of children on the Penn State campus. And they can rot in prison forevermore along with Sandusky for all I care. Paterno is dead, and no doubt the ghosts of justice have been rattled once again.

Joe Paterno will never be able to shake the eternal sting of harboring a child molester, whether it was through blissful ignorance or willful negligence.

It’s all right there in the special investigative report from former FBI director Louis Freeh, whose team’s work documented the first signs of scandal dating to 1999. Paterno, Schultz, Curley and Spanier were made aware of an incident involving Sandusky allegedly performing sex acts on an 11-year-old boy in the shower stalls of the Nittany Lions football locker room. Authorities did not press charges.

Joe Pa then gave Sandusky office space on Penn State’s main campus, with a really cool job title: Volunteer Position Director — Positive Action for Youth.


Is that what they’re calling child rapists these days?

But Sandusky’s sexual abuse goes as far back as 1971 when a 15-year-old boy was raped. He said he reported the attack to Paterno and another Penn State official. Then last year, a day after CNN broke that story, Penn State acknowledged that it had paid a settlement to a victim.

"I'd be willing to sit on a witness stand and confront Joe Paterno," the victim told CNN. "Unfortunately he died and I didn't get to."

But, hey, Joe did everything he could.

Judge John Boccabella certainly isn’t buying any of it, either.

“Why no one made a phone call to police is beyond me,” Boccabella said during the sentencing. “Why Mr. Sandusky was allowed to continue to use the Penn State facilities is beyond me. Mr. Paterno, the legendary football coach, could have made that phone call without so much as getting his hands dirty.”

The phone call would have come from the most powerful man in Pennsylvania. Not the governor. Not the university president. Not the athletic director.

Paterno was the most powerful force in all the land because of all the other things he did, many of them deserving of praise and platitudes. He was not only a great football coach but a great molder of young men. He donated millions to help build an on-campus library and at least $1 million for a campus interfaith spiritual center.

To this day, almost to a man, his former players support him unequivocally. Good men like Michael Timpson and Mike McBath.

Joe was a solid role model and father-figure to them and so many others, and therefore he was incapable of being complicit in Sandusky’s sex scandal. But all the stories, all the documents, all the testimony, and all the pain says otherwise.

Maybe Paterno was naïve, as some suggest, and brushed it off as “horseplay.” Maybe he got caught up in how this would destroy his legacy, as well as the stain it would leave on Penn State. Maybe he just didn’t want to know.

But through it all, unspeakable sins were committed on children. Atrocities. And Penn State took a page out of the Catholic Church pedophile priest playbook and tried to bury those sins.

There are at least 32 victims over the years. Those children will be forever scarred.

But so will Paterno’s legacy — forevermore — no matter how much his supporters scream in defiance.

I hope the victims and their families find some comfort in that.

=====================================================================================
All I can say is the above post is constructed on a degree of misinformation that is BEYOND STAGGERING and unfortunately, is based completely on the professionally engineered "Story" that the Media has had 6+ years to promote to a mindless & unthinking public.

No need to point all the illusions that this "article" want to continue to promote...it would take PAGES to list and I am sure it would be a waste of time. No good would come out of point out these errors!

They are all the result of what happens when state government goes bad and owns the courts - both legal and, through sophisticated legal manipulation of "evidence" shown to the public - also control the "court of public opinion" (you need a well coordinated collusion of state officials & OGBOT to get them both).

HOWEVER....lets look at the core of this matter and examine REALITY for a change. WHY ARE WE IN 2017 sending 3 PSU executives to JAIL and why a "dead Guy" is still being included in anything "SANDUSKY". One thing the media has gotten right throughout ----- THIS IS A COVER-UP.

BUT....What has been the real cover-up in this "Scandal" is how Penn State's Football program has been used as a smoke screen for TSM activities - including $650K "Hush Money" used to buy time for Corbett's Cartel of Criminals to engineer what we have seen over the past 6+ years.

Forget the "details" of who said what....they are all irrelevant. We (as the Public) have all been deceived by an engineered "Story" that co-mingles 2011 "testimonies" with 2001 events (forget 1998 - it was a non-event legally and should NEVER have been brought up - OAG Knows that!). We argue about words when the bigger picture reveals the motives, intents and benefactors of the Penn State Scandal. If you look at the "macro" issues here, it become indisputable that this is and has always been a cover-up for political misdeeds and governmental corruption.

Start with the facts as they appear in 2001 - the event time period that "convicted" C/S/S and "forever stained PSU and Paterno"

Using the same data that C/S/S and Paterno had to work with here's reality.... MM reported an event - something that he "thought" could have been a problem - but (at best)..he was not sure about. MM's dad, Dranov, Paterno, Curley and Shultz (in addition to others) all reacted to MM's 2001 story the same way....it was NOT something that should have been reported to ANYONE - WHAT COULD BE REPORTED???? A suspicion - a "maybe" with no "victim's" name to corroborate the event??? ---- no one suspected a "crime" - therefore no one said - REPORT THIS TO POLICE. Nothing in the 2001 chain of information indicated action beyond what was taken.

REMEMBER....in 2001 Sandusky was not LABELED as a pedophile. Sandusky and TSM was a 2001 "thousand point of light".

Under even the most serious level of review - they all did nothing which indicated a "conspiracy of silence" - the core conclusion of Freeh & the NCAA.

No one reacted to MM as if a child was being "RAPED" in the Penn State showers - the core of the criminal charges against C/S/S. Reason being - MM's own testimony - outside of the OAG presentment document TOTALLY removes that activity from what was observed by MM in 2001. Anything which states otherwise is a lie - a lie which forms the foundation of the OAG's case against anyone connected with PSU. In a state where the courts are not corrupt, MM's inconsistent and provable "report" of what he saw would have resulted in PERJURY charges on MM. No other person supported the core of the OAG Presentment...RAPE of a child at Penn State. So the OAG conveniently only applied the law to those that promoted its illusion of a "Story".

You NOW see what happens when a person is labeled as a Pedophile. The entire PSU Illusion all too vividly confirms the damage that is created when that label is established for someone. It convicts ONLY ON ACCUSATION - it precludes justice under the law and in America, we are SUPPOSED to have protection "under the law". So ironically (especially here) - an unsupported accusation is a crime unto itself. This is why "the conservative approach" of talking to Sandusky - then TSM was taken. WHY...Not to expose UNNECESSARILY someone who in 2001 was a pillar of the community to a criminal label that most likely (in 2001) was NOT NECESSARY.

As I said before, the legal actions taken THROUGHOUT the past 6 years have no way of being supported by evidence or the law...no matter how "liberally" you interpret the statutes. 3 men are going to jail based upon co-mingling information on a 2001 event with 2011+ media hype. The reality is C/S/S are going to jail for a "endangering children" by NOT REPORTING a non-crime by a 2001 "Pillar of the Community"
- a charge that the Sandusky trial evaluated and determined to be one which was "not guilty"
- by a "victim" (A Myers) who has publicly stated IN TESTIMONY was a non-event (no crimes at all)
- who reported the known details of this event to TSM who had ultimate responsibility for Sandusk'ys behavior and yet TSM is NOT GUILTY OF ANYTHING - in spite of numerous "other charges" by "other victims" were TSM was the only controlling entity for Sandusky's behavior!.

Now we get to MOTIVES....in the OAG version of motives, the "Penn State 4" enabled Sandusky's behavior by not reporting a single 2001 event. Their motive....."The reputation of Penn State's Football Program".

I like this MOTIVE BETTER....$650K hush money was paid to Tom Corbett so he would slow walk any investigation concerning Sandusky because that would negatively effect TSM's "daily" operations. TSM was a cash cow to PA politics providing both cash, access to key individuals (who added more cash), a central "bank" of charitable deductions and charitable "projects" that political "insiders" could "harvest" and, finally it, created its own "insiders club" which could foster "grey (if not illegal) financial deals" for its members. No wonder TSM was allowed to destroy all its records....wonder how many new EXCLUSIVELY TSM victims were lost with that action. So MILLIONS of $$$ is not as good a motive as "Protecting A Football Program's Image". You could get most people to challenge that the motive of Football reputation over MONEY$$$$.

Finally...what is the result of the Penn State Illusion and the $250M of PSU funds that were drained from the University. The Politically connected (beholding) OGBOT got to OK these payments TO UNIDENTIFIED PERSONS without financial oversight - FOREVER!!!!!. NO ONE NOW OR IN THE FUTURE CAN CHALLENGE any "payments" made any "unnamed victims" when they are lumped into anything doing with "Sandusky payments". If I were a crooked politician, I would bet that some (if not all) of these payments to the "unseen" 32+ "victims" would end up in a political slush fund - in addition to the pockets of 2-3 lawyers who would eventually "share' some fees for future "benefits" in the controlled court system of PA.

SO...HERE YOU HAVE IT...NOT ALL OF REALITY - too much of reality to cover in one post - but a much more REALISTIC SUMMARY of where we are with the C/S/S "convictions" and jailing. Its GREAT to know that American Justice (PA at least) has come to this!!!!

So in PA today...if you don't pay at LEAST $650K to the Political Machine...you have no legal rights and could go to jail on the WHIM of PA'S OAG and corrupt court system. PACORN rules the State....don't you forget it!!
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT