A news reporter can spin a story every which way. I'd worry about being the writer's pawn if I let myself form a judgment from this measly article.
If we just look at the article's facts, and not its adjectives and other spin, we see that (1) the kid trains hard, and (2) the kid says he likes training hard, and (3) the kid's guardian spent a lot of money on coaches, and (4) the money spent on coaches could have instead been saved for college tuition, and (5) the kid repeated the 8th grade. Out of those 5 facts, (1), (2), and (3) are completely positive facts. (5) (repeat grade) is common enough. Only (4) (spend college fund) is the least bit unusual, and who would I be to tell a family how to spend/invest their money, as long as it isn't on illegal drugs or something bad.
People have to decide whether to chase their dreams all the time. For rich people, it's easy to chase their dreams. For middle-class families, the decision is harder and more poignant. As a data point, Tank had to decide whether to work for more money or to keep training for the Olympics and World Championships.
Why can't Josh's family similarly decide to invest their money in the kid's dream? If Josh and his brother end up with no sports scholarships, and have very little college money, then they can still go to a cheaper college. If they didn't give it their all with the extra coaching (that rich kids get without thinking about it), then Josh and his brother might always wonder whether that lack of coaching was their downfall, and whether they should have gone "all in".
And I know somebody might claim that the dream is not the kid's dream but is the uncle's dream. Well, I say just ask the kid. I'm pretty sure he's going to say it's his dream. We can't go around telling people that we know what's in their hearts better than they do because we read an article about them.