According to varied defense attorneys.
http://m.sharonherald.com/news/stat...efc-ccbf-59bb-8fcc-b4f99eae3654.html?mode=jqm
http://m.sharonherald.com/news/stat...efc-ccbf-59bb-8fcc-b4f99eae3654.html?mode=jqm
And funny how everyone wants her to step down.
Cliff Rieders is a personal injury lawyer and notorious attention seeker. The last time he thought about criminal law was forty years go when he was in law school. He is speaking out here because he loves the attention and favors Kane because she shares his politics. Who cares what he thinks. Even if Kane beats the charges (and ignorance of grand jury secrecy rules is a pretty lame excuse for the state's highest ranking legal officer; think about that one for a minute....), she is at the very least guilty of extreme hubris and very poor judgment. Kane's lot here is a classic example of what happens when someone profoundly unqualified is placed in leadership position. She was an assistant prosecutor (not even the DA) who happened upon one one high profile case and, because of her well-connected (now-ex) husband and good looks, the next thing she knew she was Attorney General. Whether or not you agree with the politics of our recent governors or attorney generals, none of them was completely unqualified like Kane. Guilty or not, she has no business serving as Attorney General.According to varied defense attorneys.
http://m.sharonherald.com/news/stat...efc-ccbf-59bb-8fcc-b4f99eae3654.html?mode=jqm
No indictment is a sure thing , but to a lightweight ticket puncher like Kane it's the same as a death sentence.
It's crazy perusing the national news' comment sections. She is ready to be hung by the nation. There is literally no recovering from this. She was done before her arraignment due to these media articles.
Cliff Rieders is a personal injury lawyer and notorious attention seeker. The last time he thought about criminal law was forty years go when he was in law school. He is speaking out here because he loves the attention and favors Kane because she shares his politics. Who cares what he thinks. Even if Kane beats the charges (and ignorance of grand jury secrecy rules is a pretty lame excuse for the state's highest ranking legal officer; think about that one for a minute....), she is at the very least guilty of extreme hubris and very poor judgment. Kane's lot here is a classic example of what happens when someone profoundly unqualified is placed in leadership position. She was an assistant prosecutor (not even the DA) who happened upon one one high profile case and, because of her well-connected (now-ex) husband and good looks, the next thing she knew she was Attorney General. Whether or not you agree with the politics of our recent governors or attorney generals, none of them was completely unqualified like Kane. Guilty or not, she has no business serving as Attorney General.
I know you have me on ignore, but I'd love to hear how you think he stretched the facts. Everything he said, from her resume to her campaign, is accurate. Although, I would argue that she was elected more for her promises to pay back Tom Corbett on behalf of Penn State fans than her looks.LOL. You stretch the facts.
I know you have me on ignore, but I'd love to hear how you think he stretched the facts. Everything he said, from her resume to her campaign, is accurate. Although, I would argue that she was elected more for her promises to pay back Tom Corbett on behalf of Penn State fans than her looks.
If it goes to trial.....
I think it would be fun to be in the courtroom for opening arguments. If I was there, I would just watch the faces of the jury as both sides explain how it is that the Commonwealth's Attorney General is sitting in the defendant's chair in a county court house. Spit takes. Popcorn, please.
I think way too many people are mistaking this for a Federal case.
Forgive me because I haven't read any articles on this but a thought occurred to me...is it possible that Fina & Co engineered this at this time because Kane was going to move on the C/S/S trials?
To spin it another way, is this a way of preventing the C/S/S trials from moving forward?
but but but C/S/S are guilty as well. why bother with a trial?
this will never get to trial and Kane knows it. this was a classic smear job to cripple one of the enemies of corruption
As I recall, a ranking of state corruption was posted here a month or two ago, and PA did not lead the league. I'm sure there is motivation being spewed in back rooms to get to #1. If you are going to do something, be the best at it.
I'm of the opinion that Kane and C/S/S are on the same "side", but yes it is possible this is an attempt to further stifle the truth that would emerge from trials . . .
Huh? In 2004 Castor ran against Corbett in the Attorney General Primary election and lost to Corbett...Corbett went on to serve two terms as AG and one as Governor, and Castor is still in the same position he was then. If anyone, Corbett is the one who "cut short" Castor's political ambitions.kind of busy this week with work, but people should take the time to read about prosecutor Risa Vetri Ferman (who career-wise seems eerily similar to Kane), but also served under Bruce Castor, who saw his ambitions cut short when One Term Tommy got the boot . . . feels like this is old school Philly taking down the Scranton crew . . .
Huh? In 2004 Castor ran against Corbett in the Attorney General Primary election and lost to Corbett...Corbett went on to serve two terms as AG and one as Governor, and Castor is still in the same position he was then. If anyone, Corbett is the one who "cut short" Castor's political ambitions.
The public's ignorance of the political abuse potential of PA's Grand Jury Process is what is again being used to create the illusion of "crimes" - when in fact it is the way the LAWS are written that create the loopholes which promote the ability to create new crimes protected by these loopholes. This abuse is justified by the "plausible denial" of legal misused by the accusers (in this case the MontCo DA).It's crazy perusing the national news' comment sections. She is ready to be hung by the nation. There is literally no recovering from this. She was done before her arraignment due to these media articles.
Forgive me because I haven't read any articles on this but a thought occurred to me...is it possible that Fina & Co engineered this at this time because Kane was going to move on the C/S/S trials?
To spin it another way, is this a way of preventing the C/S/S trials from moving forward?
Huh? In 2004 Castor ran against Corbett in the Attorney General Primary election and lost to Corbett...Corbett went on to serve two terms as AG and one as Governor, and Castor is still in the same position he was then. If anyone, Corbett is the one who "cut short" Castor's political ambitions.
Here's a tidbit that just rips at my gutspay attention dummy. because you clearly don't understand politics.
Castor was set to get a Supreme Court appointment last year if OTT was re-elected. clearly that did not happen.
Castor also refused to prosecute Bill Cosby in 2005.
this is why I have you on ignore, because you mouth off without knowing what the heck you're talking about. I said I was busy at work, so when people bother me about someone I have on ignore saying something so blatantly stupid really pisses me off and wastes my time.
Go back to reporting posts and lying about it.
Here's a tidbit that just rips at my guts
Montgomery County district attorney race looms over prosecution of Kane (about 11 hours ago)
Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
link: http://triblive.com/politics/politicalheadlines/8853591-74/attorney-county-district#axzz3iQRPbkGm
pay attention dummy. because you clearly don't understand politics.
Castor was set to get a Supreme Court appointment last year if OTT was re-elected. clearly that did not happen.
Castor also refused to prosecute Bill Cosby in 2005.
this is why I have you on ignore, because you mouth off without knowing what the heck you're talking about. I said I was busy at work, so when people bother me about someone I have on ignore saying something so blatantly stupid really pisses me off and wastes my time.
Go back to reporting posts and lying about it.
Since I can't see, apparently, it's someone I also have on ignore. This vendetta against Kane is pure politics, hiding things and nothing more.
it is kind of funny that the PA GOP completely misjudged how pitifully unpopular One Term Tommy was at the time he ran for re-election. Castor might have run for governor and won.
Tommy was like wet shit running down your leg. A quick shower, and it's gone.
LOL, na I've been call a lot worse....but "dummy" is reserved for my wife calling me out!btw I hope you see I wasn't calling YOU the dummy, lol
yeah this is dirty PA politics at its worst
And funny how everyone wants her to step down.
That is what happens when you get charged with a crime, cover up bribery, lie to the public and do a LOUSY job. She should step down regardless of the outcome.
Since I can't see, apparently, it's someone I also have on ignore. This vendetta against Kane is pure politics, hiding things and nothing more.
Is that why Wolf wants her to step down?
A woman who is also running for Superior court. I am sure she was reminded when the judge dumped this business in her lap, it came with strings attached:You do realize that she hasn't been convicted of any of those things yet right? Those are all alleged. By your train of thought any time a corrupt politician wants to see a political enemy resign, just find a way to manipulate the judicial system to get them charged with a crime then demand they resign....must be nice!
This isn't the feds charging Kane, it's a freaking COUNTY DA (a republican one, mind you)!
If the good folks of PA want to start charging OAG folks with crimes of leaking GJ info, abuse of office, withholding exculpatory evidence, misuse of office resources (hello PORN GATE-sharing of misogynistic and disgusting porn), and lying to the public (minimizing/obfuscating role of TSM/CYS/DPW in enabling JS's crimes) they should start with Fina, Corbett, McGettigan, et. al.
You may as well just say long live the corrupt/immoral porn dogs because that's exactly who Kane is fighting against.
I guess you're right - I should read up on my politics! After some research, I was only able to find one reference to Castor "being in line" for a PA Supreme Court appointment, but that was back in 2013 where Castor expressed his interest in being appointed to fill Justice Orie Melvin's seat. Except Castor wasn't appointed to that seat by Corbett - Correale Stevens was.pay attention dummy. because you clearly don't understand politics.
Castor was set to get a Supreme Court appointment last year if OTT was re-elected. clearly that did not happen.
Castor also refused to prosecute Bill Cosby in 2005.
this is why I have you on ignore, because you mouth off without knowing what the heck you're talking about. I said I was busy at work, so when people bother me about someone I have on ignore saying something so blatantly stupid really pisses me off and wastes my time.
Go back to reporting posts and lying about it.
You do realize that she hasn't been convicted of any of those things yet right? Those are all alleged. By your train of thought any time a corrupt politician wants to see a political enemy resign, just find a way to manipulate the judicial system to get them charged with a crime then demand they resign....must be nice!
This isn't the feds charging Kane, it's a freaking COUNTY DA (a republican one, mind you)!
If the good folks of PA want to start charging OAG folks with crimes of leaking GJ info, abuse of office, withholding exculpatory evidence, misuse of office resources (hello PORN GATE-sharing of misogynistic and disgusting porn), and lying to the public (minimizing/obfuscating role of TSM/CYS/DPW in enabling JS's crimes) they should start with Fina, Corbett, McGettigan, et. al.
You may as well just say long live the corrupt/immoral porn dogs because that's exactly who Kane is fighting against.
the same Wolf who stood by her in April?
LINK
my guess is she's been made out to be a bad penny by some sh*tty people. so you gotta ask yourself . . . why are you on the side of the sh*tty people??
This isn't the feds charging Kane, it's a freaking COUNTY DA (a republican one, mind you)!
Yep. Do you realize she is a disaster?
Well stated Mr. Nittany Ned, I DO remember Dwyer but never delved into the politics as you have. thanksFWIW, this, all of this, the Hershey Trust scandal, the Dwyer scandal, the Kane scandal, the Porn Gate scandal, the Sandusky scandal, et al. is about "the machine" doing what "the machine" needs to do to protect itself and it's grip on power. The mere fact that the media has been totally ineffectual indicates that it is completely corrupted as well. This is what machine politics is. If you are in the majority, you get to reap the benefits of the corruption. Those seem to be the informal rules of PA politics, legal or not.
I spent my lunch hour reading through Dwyer depositions and it's all about winning no bid contracts and the kick back, bribe is always returned in the form of campaign contributions. It's like a broken record, same people, same tactics, same end point. A lot of that screams PSU/TSM...same stuff. The Dwyer thing has been 27 years now and it's still shrouded in questions what makes us think that the C/S/S stuff will see a different result? Especially, when a GOP judiciary is in on the fix.
I know none of this is new to most of you but after you read this and you look at it from a larger perspective you just shake your head and say..."Son of a B! This is democracy?"