Or some people are being realistic about what PSU's liability would have been. It doesn't matter if what they did violated the law or not, that's not the issue. That is why you will never understand the outside world and why people are saying the things they are about PSU. Not everything being said is out of line. Somethings are (like the culture issue, placing blame on Paterno, making it about football, etc...), but there is a lot of validity in questioning just what the hell the leaders were thinking when they decided not to report this to police. Can you at least acknowledge that if they did, there was a better chance that Sandusky would have been taken care of then instead of 10 years later?
LTE from former PSU Trustee...
- Thread starter bjf1984
- Start date
I've seen him here around long enough to know just how mentally deficient he is. I'm just curious if he knows it.
You're just dumb. You may also be a liar, but I really do think your stupidity trumps it.
What???
Oh look, a brief note with no context. Imagine that.
We both know what happened in '98. Dodging the question doesn't make it not so -- and it really doesn't do much for your BUT POLICE! argument either.
In '98 there was a DA, a cooperating victim (something the '01 incident still doesn't have) AND a sting operation. How'd that turn out?
Bonus question: Did the NCAA punish PSU for '98?
Last edited:
But Peetz' son said Paterno had something to do with the DA going missing.
I am part of "the outside world", Sir Groundhog. Can you at least acknowledge that it is unlikely there was a better chance, based on what occurred in 1998, including Alycia Chambers' report to Childline, (ref Auditor DePasquale's recent audit), when there was a known complainant and sting evidence? Maybe, just maybe, there's a reason MMQ decided not to go to police, and maybe, just maybe there was the proper action taken with the available information.
would this be a good time to point out that even the OAG acknowledges in the amended charges of FTR that, in 2001, C/S/S did not break the law??
Yeah, I'm sure it meant something totally different than what it seems. He was probably talking about the daycare and wondering if letting more children into it would be a problem, right?
The victim was not cooperating in '98. And why do you think that the outcome would have been the same?
No, this was different. In 2001 you had a witness. The reason he didn't go to police is because he is a coward and just listened to daddy. A number of people should have went to police and didn't, and look at us now.
It is so obvious that had Penn State leadership notified proper authorities none of this would have fallen on Penn State.
Now maybe I'm wrong so I'll ask any of you to show me how Penn State would have gotten in this situation had any of their leadership met with CYS, the District Attorney, and the State Police and notified them of McQueary's reported observations?
Now maybe I'm wrong so I'll ask any of you to show me how Penn State would have gotten in this situation had any of their leadership met with CYS, the District Attorney, and the State Police and notified them of McQueary's reported observations?
Yeah, I'm sure it meant something totally different than what it seems. He was probably talking about the daycare and wondering if letting more children into it would be a problem, right?
Those emails say what they say and no amount of handwaving can change that! Said someone taking info out of context before the charges kept getting dismissed. Let me know if/when a single charge survives it to trial, because they keep getting dismissed with prejudice at every turn.
What? The victim was cooperating in 1998. Put down the crack pipe son.
Show me which charges you expect to make it to trial. Its becoming more and more obvious the court thinks they did everything properly. I would just like to congratulate you, along with Roxine and a few others, for blaming known innocent people instead of trying to fix what really went wrong. Bravo to you and any victims caused by your actions.
What we are talking about (PSU's liability) has nothing to do with whether CSS are guilty or not.
Thanks, coming from you I'll take that as positive validation. BTW, and this is just an observation, another troll has been saying 'we' and 'us' just like you do.
I have. He was interviewed 4 times by 4 different people. He seemed cooperative to me.
