Not the question. Who is the better qb. Objectively.I tend to favor guys that play for penn state, maybe just me.
Too soon to tell objectively….nothing to base an objective opinion on.Not the question. Who is the better qb. Objectively.
Not the question. Who is the better qb. Objectively.
McCord may also not be a starter. He is in a battle for the job, not a given by any means that he wins it.Objectively, it's tough to argue who is better with their lack of meaningful snaps. Their support says:
-McCord has a year on Allar.
-McCord has better WRs.
-The back field is a coin toss, but advantage OSU strictly because their backs are older.
-I think we have the advantage at TE, but not quite at a Gesicki/Pat F level.
-We might have the OL advantage (we possibly did last year) if we can find a RT.
McCord may also not be a starter. He is in a battle for the job, not a given by any means that he wins it.
Wanna wager ?Allar may be better but he won't have the WR room that OSU has
Thats not what you asked in your thread title.Not the question. Who is the better qb. Objectively.
If so, then they have qb issues and McCord is gone.Way too early to tell. I have a feeling both will have big years. People better not forget about Devin Brown who might beat out McCord for the starting QB position.
McCord might be gone in that instance but I think they risk losing Brown as well. Both should be starting somewhere and yet there is only one football.If so, then they have qb issues and McCord is gone.
Then McCord is gone. Just like if someone somehow beats out Allar. That's college football in 2023.If so, then they have qb issues and McCord is gone.
I seldom disagree with you but no way would I prefer OSU's running backs to Singleton and Kaytron, though I guess you can give the Buckeyes points for greater depth at the position.Objectively, it's tough to argue who is better with their lack of meaningful snaps. Their support says:
-McCord has a year on Allar.
-McCord has better WRs.
-The back field is a coin toss, but advantage OSU strictly because their backs are older.
-I think we have the advantage at TE, but not quite at a Gesicki/Pat F level.
-We might have the OL advantage (we possibly did last year) if we can find a RT.
I seldom disagree with you but no way would I prefer OSU's running backs to Singleton and Kaytron, though I guess you can give the Buckeyes points for greater depth at the position.
Overall, Ohio State lost a lot on offense, still have considerable talent on that side of the ball, but PSU is as good or perhaps a little better. Just my .02
really a tough call. Annalynne is stunning, really. But at this point in my life, I watch more football than TV. So I have to go with football and Allar.Nfm.
Objectively there is no answer because they have barely played to this point. Anything here is pure speculation.Not the question. Who is the better qb. Objectively.
This is 100% true. However, given our lack of talent at receiver and line that remains suspect (they only appeared to improve after moving to 12 personnel which suggests adding a blocker is what helped) I would go with McCord purely because he is expected to have more mobility. If I were expecting the line to perform as well as it could in this offense and we had more talent at receiver, I would go with Allar who fits what Yurcich does much better.Objectively there is no answer because they have barely played to this point. Anything here is pure speculation.