You tried, again ... and failed. Again. Whether or not they WILL have that kind of dough isn't the point. It's if they COULD. They have every opportunity, within the rules, to compete, financially, with anyone else. That they don't or won't, is irrelevant. Compare, again, to public v. private, where public schools can't just recruit all over the map to bring in new athletes. They are, by rule, restricted in who can attend ... unlike the private schools. There's a difference in rules, yet they're competing against each other. That, of course, is inherently unfair.
If, tomorrow, some mega-donor wanted to drop a cool $1B on the Temple football program and try to turn them into a powerhouse, they could do that. Perfectly legal.
If, tomorrow, some public school wanted to recruit stud athletes from different towns to stay where they're living, but attend their high school, they COULDN'T do that, within the rules.
Even you should be able to see where you were wildly wrong. Again.
Here's another example ... if you and I competed in an IQ contest, you could, technically, win ... but you never would. That doesn't mean the test is unfair. It just means you're stupid, and I'm smart. It's a "fair" fight - my brain against yours, even if you're going to get embarrassed.
Now if the rules were set up so I had to take the test alone, but you could consult with anyone else you wanted ... I'd probably still win, but it would be an unfair competition. My brain against potentially billions of brains.
See how logic and reason work? Now you try (for once) ...