ADVERTISEMENT

More hush money will be paid...

I think, yet McQ immediately assumed a sexual act. He kept bringing up the slapping sounds to Dranov and J. McQ

I will state that the "slapping sounds" and it being"rape" in a shower was physically and acoustically impossible. We've discussed this ad nauseam. We women discussed this way back when this all blew open - that's why I could sit at Freeh's press conference and not be bothered by it. We had a rational explanation for what Mike "saw" or heard.

The "Janitor Story" that Freeh unloaded at the press conference - that one was like a cannonball thru my heart that day.

Now, with benefit of hindsight, knowing of Frank Fina's appetite for hard core porn - which included anal sex, his profound use of it during his course of work as a prosecutor, his disregard of women in the office and his haranguing them about their sex lives, his threatening interview techniques insisting to Spanier, Curley & Schultz they were told of anal sex, all while acting as Tom Corbett's head gunslinger & assassin - it is reasonable to conclude Frank Fina is most responsible for creating a certain narrative, in actively conspiring to conceal the facts, in an effort to garner a conviction, in order to carry out the trophy kill and gain good publicity for a sitting Governor and his OAG.
 
Last edited:
I will state that the "slapping sounds" and it being"rape" in a shower was physically and acoustically impossible. We've discussed this ad nauseam. We women discussed this way back when this all blew open - that's why I could sit at Freeh's press conference and not be bothered by it. We had a rational explanation for what Mike "saw" or heard.

The "Janitor Story" that Freeh unloaded at the press conference - that one was like a cannonball thru my heart that day.

Now, with benefit of hindsight, knowing of Frank Fina's appetite for hard core porn - which included anal sex, his profound use of it during his course of work as a prosecutor, his disregard of women in the office and his haranguing them about their sex lives, his threatening interview techniques insisting to Spanier, Curley & Schultz they were told of anal sex, all while acting as Tom Corbett's head gunslinger & assassin - it is reasonable to conclude Frank Fina is responsible for actively conspiring to conceal the facts, create an extreme narrative to garner a conviction, in order to carry out the trophy kill and gain good publicity for a sitting Governor and his OAG.
Has Fina found a job? Anyone know?
 
Funny you should ask. Take a look at his website. Looks like a kid put it together.

Jeez at first glance I thought that law firm he was part of was Rice Poop and Fina.
This guy is probably practicing voyeurism in his office. You know, a hidden camera in the front of his desk, maybe one in the office bathroom. Once a porndog always a porndog.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 91Joe95
Jeez at first glance I thought that law firm he was part of was Rice Poop and Fina.
This guy is probably practicing voyeurism in his office. You know, a hidden camera in the front of his desk, maybe one in the office bathroom. Once a porndog always a porndog.
Spoken like a true "porndog" :cool:
 
Said the anonymous message board dude posting at 4:13 in the morning.
What a reasoned and detailed response, kudos.

Now back to reality. It's utterly ridiculous to think Spanier was concerned about physical abuse charges (rather than sexual) when he was told of Sandusky showering alone with a child.

Active kids gets bruises all the time. Sandusky and TSM kids regularly engaged in activities that could potentially lead to getting a bruise.

You could argue liability if there was serious injury, but that's not what you did. No, you argued a bruise from innocent horseplay, possibly resulting in a physical abuse charge, is all Spanier was concerned with when he wrote "it leaves us vulnerable for not having reported it".

For people who claim to want the truth you certainly go to great lengths to avoid it.
 
What a reasoned and detailed response, kudos.

Now back to reality. It's utterly ridiculous to think Spanier was concerned about physical abuse charges (rather than sexual) when he was told of Sandusky showering alone with a child.

Active kids gets bruises all the time. Sandusky and TSM kids regularly engaged in activities that could potentially lead to getting a bruise.

You could argue liability if there was serious injury, but that's not what you did. No, you argued a bruise from innocent horseplay, possibly resulting in a physical abuse charge, is all Spanier was concerned with when he wrote "it leaves us vulnerable for not having reported it".

For people who claim to want the truth you certainly go to great lengths to avoid it.
Without your buddies.....is the "circle" jerk now reduced to a "point" pull?
 
What a reasoned and detailed response, kudos.

Now back to reality. It's utterly ridiculous to think Spanier was concerned about physical abuse charges (rather than sexual) when he was told of Sandusky showering alone with a child.

Active kids gets bruises all the time. Sandusky and TSM kids regularly engaged in activities that could potentially lead to getting a bruise.

You could argue liability if there was serious injury, but that's not what you did. No, you argued a bruise from innocent horseplay, possibly resulting in a physical abuse charge, is all Spanier was concerned with when he wrote "it leaves us vulnerable for not having reported it".

For people who claim to want the truth you certainly go to great lengths to avoid it.

Do me a favor and piss off Mr. Anonymous Message Board Guy.
 
Do me a favor and piss off Mr. Anonymous Message Board Guy.
Again, what a compelling argument you've defending your original post.

It's not my fault you threw out some half cocked that is easily shredded with basic logic. Why not admit it was ridiculous argument to make?
 
Without your buddies.....is the "circle" jerk now reduced to a "point" pull?
You spend the majority of your life posting the same things over and over on this board congratulating each other. That's a circle jerk nitwit.

Someone pointing flawed logic isn't. You can't even insult someone properly.
 
You spend the majority of your life posting the same things over and over on this board congratulating each other. That's a circle jerk nitwit.

Someone pointing flawed logic isn't. You can't even insult someone properly.
No insult here. Get lost maggot.
 
Could be.

But after personally meeting and speaking with so many in all this - people who would NEVER normally be in my social sphere: Local & State politicians, Child/Victim Advocates, Attorney Generals, Trustees, former Federal Prosecutors, PA media, etc - I can't underestimate the power of self interest, greed, political correctness, election points, inter & intra- departmental dysfunction, funding over fairness, personal agendas, petty vendettas & just flat out cowardice.

A swirling miasma of misplaced priorities that just fueled a crisis manufactured out of the OAG. The very office that is sworn to uphold the constitutional rights of those persons they torched.

It's just been such a huge eye opener on how bad things really are.

But hey - football.
I'm glad you finally caught on. Football is indeed the devil.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jansmuts
Using facts and reason don't go very far here, but I try.

Hey, that's almost CR-esque in its delusions of grandeur. And if I may be so bold, you seem to have acquired another disgusting personality trait of his.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT