Okay, I taught middle school for 28 years and only took one school law class.
How does someone get away with not releasing documents in a criminal investigation where the wrong-doer has been found guilty?
OL
And our BOT released documents and a report they paid for without even reading it. Both situations are unbelievable to me.
I am not a lawyer, so I apologize if these are dumb questions.
Anyway, isn't what MSU is doing a form of obstruction of justice? How is this legal? And why is the AG letting them get away with it?
And our BOT released documents and a report they paid for without even reading it. Both situations are unbelievable to me.
On the flip, flip side, the Michigan AG's "client" is the citizenry of the entire state of Michigan, so......... And I know this is going to sound wrong. So let me clarify that IMO the people at MSU are scum ..... But in a twisted sort of way, the advisory team and legal team at MSU are handling their case "the right way". Remember, their job is to protect their client. Their job is the welfare of their client, which is MSU. And if what they are doing is going to cause the AG of the State of Michigan to close the case, then they are doing their job. On the flip side, look at what PSU's council did.
If there is such a thing as "legal malpractice" then the council who advised PSU back in 2011/12 should have been sued for "legal malpractice".
I'm thinking that this should be pretty clear.
Unless you consider that their assignment was to make JVP the big shiny object to blame to point others away from the 2nd mile and the old guard bot...... And I know this is going to sound wrong. So let me clarify that IMO the people at MSU are scum ..... But in a twisted sort of way, the advisory team and legal team at MSU are handling their case "the right way". Remember, their job is to protect their client. Their job is the welfare of their client, which is MSU. And if what they are doing is going to cause the AG of the State of Michigan to close the case, then they are doing their job. On the flip side, look at what PSU's council did.
If there is such a thing as "legal malpractice" then the council who advised PSU back in 2011/12 should have been sued for "legal malpractice".
Unless you consider that their assignment was to make JVP the big shiny object to blame to point others away from the 2nd mile and the old guard bot
So it's not suspended, just they can't go any further because MSU is stalling.
Yet still silence from Emmert and Delany.
Just further goes to show that if the BOT wanted this to go away, they could have made it go away.
Looks like MSU is due to get about $290M from the state. Time for state of Michigan to play hardball, but they won’t.
I agree. I think you are right. I think the BOT decided on a "blame the dead guy" defense. But I just do not understand their reasoning. What I think they failed to comprehend was that Paterno = Penn State. By laying the blame on Paterno, since Paterno = Penn State, then in effect you were laying the blame on Penn State.
They either understood this and still wanted it. Or, they were really stupid and did not comprehend, that to about 99.9% of the general public, Paterno & Penn State were one in the same.
Judging by the Michigan AG office announcing at 4:30pm on Christmas Eve that they were suspending or ending the investigation, it sounds like they want it to disappear as much as MSU and Lou Anna Simon do.
And our BOT released documents and a report they paid for without even reading it. Both situations are unbelievable to me.
Maybe the AG office “clarified” their statement due to pushback?
I have no doubt the reactions/actions during subsequent scandals in academia and elsewhere is direct result of Penn State's bend over and take it then ask for forgiveness later approach and end result.
I agree. I think you are right. I think the BOT decided on a "blame the dead guy" defense. But I just do not understand their reasoning. What I think they failed to comprehend was that Paterno = Penn State. By laying the blame on Paterno, since Paterno = Penn State, then in effect you were laying the blame on Penn State.
They either understood this and still wanted it. Or, they were really stupid and did not comprehend, that to about 99.9% of the general public, Paterno & Penn State were one in the same.
One thing I seem to have learned is that if a small number of people cooperate in the commission of a crime or obstruct an investigation, it’s a conspiracy. If a larger number of people do the exact same thing it becomes an acceptable “ cultural shift “.I am not a lawyer, so I apologize if these are dumb questions.
Anyway, isn't what MSU is doing a form of obstruction of justice? How is this legal? And why is the AG letting them get away with it?
Bingo.Or some of them and their family members were complicit in the 2nd Mile handling of Sandusky and they determined that having Penn State take the hit and open its pocketbook was preferable to them taking a hit personally. Throw in being able to settle old scores with the soon to be dead guy and it was a no brainer for them. Thus the stipulation that any victim settling with Penn St agree not to sue the 2nd Mile. Bring in the shredder trucks and life is good for the Old Guard BoT and their families.
Wanted to protect themselves and take down Joe - reputation of PSU was an innocent bystander of their self-serving actions.
My exact thoughts. Look at how PSU handled their scandal and do the exact opposite. PSU released a bogus internal investigation report and bent over for the NCAA. Everyone else claimed they did nothing wrong and flipped the bird at Emmert. Seems to have worked well for MSU, OSU, Baylor and UNC.Agreed. Our ineptness and bend over attitude was the blueprint for everyone else as to how to successfully navigate these situations and come away unscathed.
Now THAT is like the PSU case. Lol. Pretty big, nay, EXISTENTIAL question for your answer to be inadvertently misleading.Whoops! The Michigan AG misspoke! Fro the beginning of an AP article:
LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Michigan’s attorney general on Wednesday said her communications director’s statement announcing the suspension of a nearly two-year criminal investigation into Michigan State University’s handling of complaints against serial sexual abuser Larry Nassar was “inadvertently misleading.”
Attorney General Dana Nessel said in a written statement that the investigation is ongoing.
I still never understood why some stakeholder never initiated a class action lawsuit against the BOT for breach of fiduciary responsibility - there is no way all those payouts didn’t result in increased costs for PSU students.