Any right thinking judge (the number of those is dwindling by the day) would throw out such a groundless suit at the outset. It would be nice to be able to say that no right thinking lawyer would ever file such a groundless suit, but sadly the number of right thinking lawyers is dwindling even faster. Money and politics prevail over sense and justice far too often. Private institutions don’t have to treat people equally (except with respect to race, gender, disability, etc.). They are free to “discriminate.” By the NCAA’s tortured logic, no school should have admissions or participation’s standards for any student. All prospective students who apply would have to be admitted and could not be held to any sort of standards while enrolled. The NCAA is a confederacy of dunces.The NCAA is acknowledging the academic ideal of big time college athletics is a joke. They're likely trying to get out ahead of any future lawsuits which will claim someone is being denied the opportunity to play college football or basketball. The suit would highlight the multiple instances of the NCAA ignoring academic shenanigans of certain member schools. The NCAA doesn't want to air that laundry.
I’ll respond,No responses on this video. Go figure.
They're laughing at us.I’ll respond,
World competition to America (China, Germany, Japan, Russia, Iran, France, etc) are all hoping that skills don’t supersede race, gender, sexual orientation equity in America .
It’s not like the minimum SAT score required was y difficult to reach. It just takes a minimum of effort. If you can’t get that level, college probably isn’t for you.Not sure how they could require a minimum score from an athlete yet the average Joe doesn't even have to take the SAT. I get the point that there needs to be some kind of way of assessing that the athlete is academically ready for college. Not confident the minimum score on the SAT was a good metric anyway.
I have the utmost confidence in the world that hypocrite clown boy Emmert will figure this out. After all look at the role model university, LSU, that he helped steer into the cesspool.
Dropping test scores for athletes entering college will damage College Sports & K-12.
Both college & K-12 require some academic performance from students wanting to participate in extracurricular sport and activities.
No entry test scores for college entry is opening the door isn’t just damaging to athletes but to all students. Having more students taking remedial HS courses in College doesn’t help anyone.
Nothing could be more racist and harmful to unmotivated HS kids. It assumes black kids are incapable to perform academically so we will let them into college anyway to be fair. Their assumption is false, their motives noble but their recommendation is racist and harmful to black kids. So sad. Just another surrender to the street culture
Because colleges have adopted no standards doesn’t make it good for America.I'm a high school counselor. Most colleges aren't requiring test scores anymore, so this is just the norm for all students entering college at this point. Kids can still take the test and have the option to submit them (and a few still require them), but test scores haven't really correlated with student success, so not a lot of weight is put on them anymore.
Because colleges have adopted no standards doesn’t make it good for America.
What about K-12 ? Shouldn’t there be academic performance requirements to participate in extra Curricular activities?
Without academic requirements C or D, some will ignore academics entirely but just wanna play ball. D is pretty much doing that counselor. No?
Didn't a judge somewhere rule that scholarship athletes are employees of the school? The next logical step is to not require athletes to take classes at all. The employee cutting grass doesn't have to go to school. The transition from student athlete to pro will be complete.Dropping test scores for athletes entering college will damage College Sports & K-12.
Both college & K-12 require some academic performance from students wanting to participate in extracurricular sport and activities.
No entry test scores for college entry is opening the door isn’t just damaging to athletes but to all students. Having more students taking remedial HS courses in College doesn’t help anyone.
![]()
NCAA proposes to remove minimum test scores
An NCAA task force recommended on Friday that incoming freshmen in Division I and II sports should no longer be required to meet minimum scores on standardized tests for initial eligibility.www.espn.com
Didn't a judge somewhere rule that scholarship athletes are employees of the school? The next logical step is to not require athletes to take classes at all. The employee cutting grass doesn't have to go to school. The transition from student athlete to pro will be complete.
Reagan predicted it. If we were to be conquered it would be w/ out a shot.The World simply can’t believe how America is self imploding.
![]()
China fires hypersonic nuke 'right round the Earth' leaving US reeling
CHINA has fired a hypersonic missile around the globe with the US left reeling by the terrifying display of military strength. US intelligence and military officials were reportedly left stunned af…www.the-sun.com
SAT is basically an intelligence test like an IQ test. They of course cannot predict work ethic. As for predicting student success, it isn't simple. Students with low SAT scores who major in less rigorous majors can of course have a higher GPA than those that major in more rigorous majors. Of course the college matters as well. Since it is very hard to do a multi-variate study for anything in education, most studies are completely meaningless. I am not arguing that test scores predict student success, but I also wouldn't argue that they don't.I'm a high school counselor. Most colleges aren't requiring test scores anymore, so this is just the norm for all students entering college at this point. Kids can still take the test and have the option to submit them (and a few still require them), but test scores haven't really correlated with student success, so not a lot of weight is put on them anymore.
SAT is basically an intelligence test like an IQ test. They of course cannot predict work ethic. As for predicting student success, it isn't simple. Students with low SAT scores who major in less rigorous majors can of course have a higher GPA than those that major in more rigorous majors. Of course the college matters as well. Since it is very hard to do a multi-variate study for anything in education, most studies are completely meaningless. I am not arguing that test scores predict student success, but I also wouldn't argue that they don't.
Yes. Colleges always need to have a way of knowing who can afford to pay the bill. They accept enough of those first, and then can round out their class however they want. My post was about predicting success.It has been demonstrated that standardized test scores track closely to one factor, family income.
Colleges rely much more on zipcode to guess who can afford to payYes. Colleges always need to have a way of knowing who can afford to pay the bill. They accept enough of those first, and then can round out their class however they want. My post was about predicting success.
You may be right, but I have been told different. My knowledge is anecdotal only. As for success, I agree. What most of the studies call success is GPA.Colleges rely much more on zipcode to guess who can afford to pay
As for sucess, good luck trying to define it.
The correlation between SAT scores and family income only holds when analyzing large numbers. On an individual level, which is where colleges guess who can pay, it's far less compelling and far less than zip code.You may be right, but I have been told different. My knowledge is anecdotal only. As for success, I agree. What most of the studies call success is GPA.
SAT’s are achievement tests, not intelligence tests, which is why they correlate to income (who can spend money on tutors and resources that teach to the test among other benefits of wealth). Intelligence tests are about ability, which is not correlated to income, race, location, etc, and tend to stay static.SAT is basically an intelligence test like an IQ test. They of course cannot predict work ethic. As for predicting student success, it isn't simple. Students with low SAT scores who major in less rigorous majors can of course have a higher GPA than those that major in more rigorous majors. Of course the college matters as well. Since it is very hard to do a multi-variate study for anything in education, most studies are completely meaningless. I am not arguing that test scores predict student success, but I also wouldn't argue that they don't.
Do you think that maybe it works like this:I'm a high school counselor. Most colleges aren't requiring test scores anymore, so this is just the norm for all students entering college at this point. Kids can still take the test and have the option to submit them (and a few still require them), but test scores haven't really correlated with student success, so not a lot of weight is put on them anymore.
Yawn.It's Pennsylvania College of Technology, Mr Williamsport.
Do you think that maybe it works like this:
High SAT score - goes into engineering, physics, math, CS - competition also had high SAT scores.
Middle SAT score - goes into business, econ, languages - competition had middle of pack SAT score.
Lower SAT score - goes into literature, Journalism, Social work, education - competition had lower SAT scores.
And guess what happened - each category had the same average college grades....
No need. Your anecdote, which might not even be true, cannot outweigh the statistics.Will have to ask my teacher friend how she got into Dartmouth with such low SAT scores…
No need. Your anecdote, which might not even be true, cannot outweigh the statistics.
Furthermore, there's nothing impressive about Dartmouth. I'd take a WVU engineering grad over a Dartmouth education grad and so would every other competent person.
https://www.businessinsider.com/heres-the-average-sat-score-for-every-college-major-2014-10?op=1
Almost bit my tongue in half here....Everyone serves a purpose.
It is called the dumming down of America. Another turn toward college professionalism. Why have standards? It is called Liberalism my friend.Dropping test scores for athletes entering college will damage College Sports & K-12.
Both college & K-12 require some academic performance from students wanting to participate in extracurricular sport and activities.
No entry test scores for college entry is opening the door isn’t just damaging to athletes but to all students. Having more students taking remedial HS courses in College doesn’t help anyone.
![]()
NCAA proposes to remove minimum test scores
An NCAA task force recommended on Friday that incoming freshmen in Division I and II sports should no longer be required to meet minimum scores on standardized tests for initial eligibility.www.espn.com
No need. Your anecdote, which might not even be true, cannot outweigh the statistics.
Furthermore, there's nothing impressive about Dartmouth. I'd take a WVU engineering grad over a Dartmouth education grad and so would every other competent person.
https://www.businessinsider.com/heres-the-average-sat-score-for-every-college-major-2014-10?op=1
"Dumming down?" It has happened already.It is called the dumming down of America. Another turn toward college professionalism. Why have standards? It is called Liberalism my friend.
We're getting dumber by the hour Art."Dumming down?" It has happened already.
To do what? Teach something in which an engineering grad has no background?
BTW, Dartmouth doesn't offer a degree in education. It does have a minor, which allows grads with degrees in other disciplines to obtain teaching certificates.
We're getting dumber by the hour Art.
So are most Colleges going with 100% GPA? Curious since i have a Sophomore in High School now.I'm a high school counselor. Most colleges aren't requiring test scores anymore, so this is just the norm for all students entering college at this point. Kids can still take the test and have the option to submit them (and a few still require them), but test scores haven't really correlated with student success, so not a lot of weight is put on them anymore.
So are most Colleges going with 100% GPA? Curious since i have a Sophomore in High School now.
Thanks Art - She won't be going to PSU - wants to exit the state of PA - he older sister is already at School in Savannah and this one wants to head to the West Coast - with the cost of PSU npw there is really no reason to try to keep them in state any longer - out of state schools are almost the same price in many cases.Depends on the school. Essays and recommendations have become more important. Don't know what schools like PSU, which in the past never required them, do.
You must ave missed the part about this being permanent. How many participation trophies did you win? If you went to see someone with his head where you describe it look in the mirror.Seriously, what do people expect? You take school away from kids for a year, year and a half, and then add a whole host of other restrictions, and then pretend it has no effect on kids and their scholastic achievement, among other things? This country has its head up its ass right now, especially about what is important.
Of course not. Far better to base possible college success on those grading systems which no longer are permitted to give kids an “F”.I'm a high school counselor. Most colleges aren't requiring test scores anymore, so this is just the norm for all students entering college at this point. Kids can still take the test and have the option to submit them (and a few still require them), but test scores haven't really correlated with student success, so not a lot of weight is put on them anymore.
Source?It has been demonstrated that standardized test scores track closely to one factor, family income.