NewsLanc.com on Eakin e-mails
- Thread starter bjf1984
- Start date
Kudos to Mr. Keisling. I'm grateful that someone in the media is paying attention.
For those that do not want to read the whole article....here are the concluding paragraphs:
For one example, the email chain titled “Men in Training” already has troubling, and darker, overtones that certainly shed light, when viewed in context, on Pennsylvania law enforcement, or lack thereof.
As fate would have it, the “Men in Training” email was mailed to recipients on March 3, 2009 — the same day Centre County DA Michael Madeira referred the Jerry Sandusky case to Pennsylvania Attorney General Tom Corbett’s office, according to AG Kane’s Moulton Report on the investigation of the Sandusky case.
“Mr. Sandusky is well known to me and is the adoptive father of my wife’s brother,” DA Madeira wrote to AG Corbett’s executive deputy attorney general on March 3, 2009. “My wife, who was adopted by another family, remains close to her brother and to his adoptive family. Given the close family relationship, an apparent and actual conflict of interest exists for me and my office. Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Office of Attorney General assume responsibility for the prosecution of this case, effective immediately.”
But AG Tom Corbett’s office wouldn’t be seriously assuming responsibility for the Sandusky case “effective immediately.”
That same day, March 3, 2009, the “Men in Training” email recipients are listed to include chief Sandusky prosecutor Frank Fina, Sandusky case chief investigator Randy Feathers, and future Pennsylvania State Police Commissioner Frank Noonan (who himself was also a retired FBI agent), among many others.
At the time, this is what these men were doing in AG Tom Corbett’s office when they should have been going after former Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky.
As fate would have it, the “Men in Training” email was mailed to recipients on March 3, 2009 — the same day Centre County DA Michael Madeira referred the Jerry Sandusky case to Pennsylvania Attorney General Tom Corbett’s office, according to AG Kane’s Moulton Report on the investigation of the Sandusky case.
“Mr. Sandusky is well known to me and is the adoptive father of my wife’s brother,” DA Madeira wrote to AG Corbett’s executive deputy attorney general on March 3, 2009. “My wife, who was adopted by another family, remains close to her brother and to his adoptive family. Given the close family relationship, an apparent and actual conflict of interest exists for me and my office. Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Office of Attorney General assume responsibility for the prosecution of this case, effective immediately.”
But AG Tom Corbett’s office wouldn’t be seriously assuming responsibility for the Sandusky case “effective immediately.”
That same day, March 3, 2009, the “Men in Training” email recipients are listed to include chief Sandusky prosecutor Frank Fina, Sandusky case chief investigator Randy Feathers, and future Pennsylvania State Police Commissioner Frank Noonan (who himself was also a retired FBI agent), among many others.
At the time, this is what these men were doing in AG Tom Corbett’s office when they should have been going after former Penn State coach Jerry Sandusky.
The same day DA Madeira wanted them to look into Jerry Sandusky’s behavior, Fina, Feathers, Noonan and the others were receiving email images from cohorts depicting a young boy staring down the underpants of a topless young girl, among other photos.
Last edited:
Loved the last paragraph of that article, to wit:
"The same day DA Madeira wanted them to look into Jerry Sandusky’s behavior, Fina, Feathers, Noonan and the others were receiving email images from cohorts depicting a young boy staring down the underpants of a topless young girl, among other photos."
LOL...
"The same day DA Madeira wanted them to look into Jerry Sandusky’s behavior, Fina, Feathers, Noonan and the others were receiving email images from cohorts depicting a young boy staring down the underpants of a topless young girl, among other photos."
LOL...
Now we know why it took so long to charge Sandusky. These scumbags were consumed with trading porn mail.
Maybe these are some of the issues that the boys in Harrisburg are rushing to remove Kane ……if anything comes out in future emails relating to child porn or the exploiting of children the these dirty politicos are in very deep trouble. It appears on both sides of the isle.
Follow Ray's twitter to the Keisling article posted earlier today.
Indeed, some of the photos definitely involved "exploitation" -- a crime. https://twitter.com/No1Lion99/status/657597406448586752 …
Ray Blehar added,
John Yonchuk@no1lion99
@Owens_abc27 remember our convo about child porn? It appears it's closer than some wish to admit http://newslanc.com/2015/10/23/state-court-porno-emails-and-relationships-demand-federal-prosecutor/ … @RayBlehar
Behind the Green Door (by Keisling )
DN Editorial: 5 things you won't believe about latest porn email scandal
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/opinion/20151023_DN_Editorial__5_things_you_won_t_believe_about_latest_porn_email_scandal.html
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/opinion/20151023_DN_Editorial__5_things_you_won_t_believe_about_latest_porn_email_scandal.html
