ADVERTISEMENT

Nolf and the huge gap to the field...

NittanyChris

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2001
10,514
12,713
1
After Jason's recent complete and utter domination of the #2 and #3 guys at 157, I started to wonder. Has there ever been a larger gap between the #1 guy and the field? What do people think? David Taylor's senior year? Not sure. Curious to hear people's thoughts.
WE ARE!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: diggerpup
David Taylor's senior year?

Was DT's senior year the year that he destroyed Hatchett in the finals? I'm thinking sophomore. Anyway, the talent gap from Taylor to Hatchery, et al is larger than Nolf to Berger, Hidlay, Panteleo (when right), etc. IMO
 
Was DT's senior year the year that he destroyed Hatchett in the finals? I'm thinking sophomore. Anyway, the talent gap from Taylor to Hatchery, et al is larger than Nolf to Berger, Hidlay, Panteleo (when right), etc. IMO


Hatchet was an 11 seed, unlikely finalist.

OP topic was gap from 1-2 and 1-3.

That year (2012), the NCAA 165 seeds were:

1: David Taylor, PSU
2: Shane Onufer, WYO
3: Andrew Sorensen, ISU
4: B. Abdurakhmonov, Clarion
5: Mike Evans, Iowa

But DT did go:
Fall
Fall
Fall
Fall
TF
 
Last edited:
The short answer is yes. DT pretty much every year. And Zain.

Freshman year Taylor dominated, just not as much as the following years. Despite the mistake he made in the final, he dispatched #2 Steve Fittery in the semis 7-1. He was a tech machine.

Soph year....pin pin pin pin tech. Nvmd

Junior year. Ok...so there was Kyle Dake. So it’s not the same as the drop off from 1 to 2. But the cliff appeared after that.

Senior Year. Exactly who was close to him?

And while a close decision from Zain with Sorenson and 1 with Clagon one year, doesn’t really mean the field was that close. When the lights were on the biggest stage, I might even suggest opposing wrestlers would actually have preferred to wrestle Jason than Zain.

(Micah may just prefer to not...)
 
Hatchet was an 11 seed, unlikely finalist.

OP topic was gap from 1-2 and 1-3.

That year (2012), the NCAA 165 seeds were:

1: David Taylor, PSU
2: Shane Onufer, WYO
3: Andrew Sorensen, ISU
4: B. Abdurakhmonov, Clarion
5: Mike Evans, Iowa

But DT did go:
Fall
Fall
Fall
Fall
TF

"Hatchett, et al" would include your 1-5 seeds. Also, Hatchett was #2 when it counted. So, ultimately, the gap between 1 and 2 was Taylor to Hatchett.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hlstone
The short answer is yes. DT pretty much every year. And Zain.

Freshman year Taylor dominated, just not as much as the following years. Despite the mistake he made in the final, he dispatched #2 Steve Fittery in the semis 7-1. He was a tech machine.

Soph year....pin pin pin pin tech. Nvmd

Junior year. Ok...so there was Kyle Dake. So it’s not the same as the drop off from 1 to 2. But the cliff appeared after that.

Senior Year. Exactly who was close to him?

And while a close decision from Zain with Sorenson and 1 with Clagon one year, doesn’t really mean the field was that close. When the lights were on the biggest stage, I might even suggest opposing wrestlers would actually have preferred to wrestle Jason than Zain.

(Micah may just prefer to not...)

I considered Zain, but I disagree. While I never thought he would lose, Sorensen was closer to Zain than either Deakin or Berger are to Nolf. Barring injury (knock on wood), there is absolutely zero chance that either one of those two could beat Nolf. I'd have given Sorensen maybe a 1 to 2% shot at an upset with Zain.
 
I considered Zain, but I disagree. While I never thought he would lose, Sorensen was closer to Zain than either Deakin or Berger are to Nolf. Barring injury (knock on wood), there is absolutely zero chance that either one of those two could beat Nolf. I'd have given Sorensen maybe a 1 to 2% shot at an upset with Zain.
Only if Zain got bored after beating Sorensen another 95 times.
 
After Jason's recent complete and utter domination of the #2 and #3 guys at 157, I started to wonder. Has there ever been a larger gap between the #1 guy and the field? What do people think? David Taylor's senior year? Not sure. Curious to hear people's thoughts.
WE ARE!!!

Im pretty sure Ben Askren ran thru most everyone in 06 and 07, after Pendleton graduated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diggerpup
I considered Zain, but I disagree. While I never thought he would lose, Sorensen was closer to Zain than either Deakin or Berger are to Nolf. Barring injury (knock on wood), there is absolutely zero chance that either one of those two could beat Nolf. I'd have given Sorensen maybe a 1 to 2% shot at an upset with Zain.

Only when he had the flu
 
  • Like
Reactions: PD4thespawn
So let me ask you...do you believe the gap from Zain to Sorensen was bigger than Nolf to Berger or Deakin?
No but that doesn't make the reverse true.

If Sorensen couldn't win that home OT match, that's your answer. He couldn't beat Zain when he attacked or when he played. defense first.

BTW, Zain also majored Deakin.
 
After Jason's recent complete and utter domination of the #2 and #3 guys at 157, I started to wonder. Has there ever been a larger gap between the #1 guy and the field? What do people think? David Taylor's senior year? Not sure. Curious to hear people's thoughts.
WE ARE!!!
The gap is not just wrestling skills. It is mental. How hard it must be to picture yourself beating Jason: yet that is what is needed to have a chance.
 
Satisfaction enough, for me, to sit back and enjoy watching these guys wrestle. Hard to believe it's been...;
-- 10 years since Cael, Casey and Cody arrived
-- 7 years since Tank won his NC
-- 6 years since Q won his last of two NC's
-- 5 years since Ed won his last of three, and David his last of two NC's
-- etc., etc., etc.

...and that the Nolf / Nickal era is coming to an end. Mind-boggling how quickly life passes :(.
 
Last edited:
No but that doesn't make the reverse true.

If Sorensen couldn't win that home OT match, that's your answer. He couldn't beat Zain when he attacked or when he played. defense first.

BTW, Zain also majored Deakin.

The circumstances were different when they each wrestled Deakin, but Zain had to really work to get the major on Deakin, while Deakin had to really "work" just to keep it a major against Nolf.

I don't know if it's an indication of the quality of their opponents or a result of their styles, but Zain definitely wrestled a lot more close matches than Nolf (Sorenson @ CHA and Collica in 2017, Sorenson at 2018 B1Gs).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dogwelder
That poor kid from Mizz.....Zain almost broke him in half his junior year. I think that guy scored the first td, and the announcers were like, yeah, he has to do his thing and take it right to Rutherford..........ah, no.

Amazing he didn’t press charges
 
The circumstances were different when they each wrestled Deakin, but Zain had to really work to get the major on Deakin, while Deakin had to really "work" just to keep it a major against Nolf.

I don't know if it's an indication of the quality of their opponents or a result of their styles, but Zain definitely wrestled a lot more close matches than Nolf (Sorenson @ CHA and Collica in 2017, Sorenson at 2018 B1Gs).
So the difference between Zain and Jason is whether or not Deakin concentrated his stalling in one period?

PS, who won the Most Dominant Awards?
 
So the difference between Zain and Jason is whether or not Deakin concentrated his stalling in one period?

PS, who won the Most Dominant Awards?

Zain.

And no. I'd say the difference is that Zain wrestled more close matches than Nolf.
 
Zain.

And no. I'd say the difference is that Zain wrestled more close matches than Nolf.
Pantaleo would disagree.

Perhaps you could look up and post the data against all opponents as opppised to 2 or 3 selected opponents?
 
Wrestlestat has all the data you want.

Pantaleo was Nolf's only 1 score match since his freshman year. Zain had the three I referenced above.

I'm not sure what specific data you want, but this isn't a 100% objective data-driven thing. Part of it is an eye-ball test, subjective opinion.

In my opinion, Sorenson was closer to beating Zain than any of Nolf's opponents have been (excluding the first year on the mat for each, in which they both had guys they went 1-2 against). Sorenson held Zain to a decision 3 times in 2017 and 2018 with 2 of those matches being victories of 2 points or less.

Zain is an all-timer. But so is Nolf. And in my opinion, Sorenson was closer to Zain than anyone was to Nolf (again, excluding the first year on the mat for each).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Afw6006 and tabenn
I had to look up this Nolf guy that you are talking about. Not impressed. I mean freshman year loses twice to some guy from Illinois on the big stages that he had dismantled earlier in the season. Talk about regression. Had an ok soph year. Saw him literally give up against I think a dude from Rutgers of all places and was so embarrassed that he took the rest of the regular season off. Then come nattys gets an amazing draw to get a fellow competition dodger in the quarterfinals who just happens to be from the same hs club. As an Iowa fan, I think the Hawks really lucked out when he chose Penn St. With all of the data points above, how could anyone possibly feel Nolf is that much better than the field?

Disclaimer: For anyone that reads this as anything but sarcasm and posts a rebuttal needs to immediately delete their rivals account and rethink their life choices....
 
Wrestlestat has all the data you want.

Pantaleo was Nolf's only 1 score match since his freshman year. Zain had the three I referenced above.

I'm not sure what specific data you want, but this isn't a 100% objective data-driven thing. Part of it is an eye-ball test, subjective opinion.

In my opinion, Sorenson was closer to beating Zain than any of Nolf's opponents have been (excluding the first year on the mat for each, in which they both had guys they went 1-2 against). Sorenson held Zain to a decision 3 times in 2017 and 2018 with 2 of those matches being victories of 2 points or less.

Zain is an all-timer. But so is Nolf. And in my opinion, Sorenson was closer to Zain than anyone was to Nolf (again, excluding the first year on the mat for each).
My entire point is that this is a distinction without a difference. This confirmed that for me.
 
They're both great wrestlers, entirely different "styles", both fun to watch for Penn State fans.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT