David Taylor's senior year?
Was DT's senior year the year that he destroyed Hatchett in the finals? I'm thinking sophomore. Anyway, the talent gap from Taylor to Hatchery, et al is larger than Nolf to Berger, Hidlay, Panteleo (when right), etc. IMO
Hatchet was an 11 seed, unlikely finalist.
OP topic was gap from 1-2 and 1-3.
That year (2012), the NCAA 165 seeds were:
1: David Taylor, PSU
2: Shane Onufer, WYO
3: Andrew Sorensen, ISU
4: B. Abdurakhmonov, Clarion
5: Mike Evans, Iowa
But DT did go:
Fall
Fall
Fall
Fall
TF
The short answer is yes. DT pretty much every year. And Zain.
Freshman year Taylor dominated, just not as much as the following years. Despite the mistake he made in the final, he dispatched #2 Steve Fittery in the semis 7-1. He was a tech machine.
Soph year....pin pin pin pin tech. Nvmd
Junior year. Ok...so there was Kyle Dake. So it’s not the same as the drop off from 1 to 2. But the cliff appeared after that.
Senior Year. Exactly who was close to him?
And while a close decision from Zain with Sorenson and 1 with Clagon one year, doesn’t really mean the field was that close. When the lights were on the biggest stage, I might even suggest opposing wrestlers would actually have preferred to wrestle Jason than Zain.
(Micah may just prefer to not...)
Only if Zain got bored after beating Sorensen another 95 times.I considered Zain, but I disagree. While I never thought he would lose, Sorensen was closer to Zain than either Deakin or Berger are to Nolf. Barring injury (knock on wood), there is absolutely zero chance that either one of those two could beat Nolf. I'd have given Sorensen maybe a 1 to 2% shot at an upset with Zain.
Only if Zain got bored after beating Sorensen another 95 times.
Aside from the OT nailbiter, Sorenson was never close to Zain, and some of the things Zain did to him made me cringe. Zain brutalized his competition, Jason just toys with his.So let me ask you...do you believe the gap from Zain to Sorensen was bigger than Nolf to Berger or Deakin?
Aside from the OT nailbiter, Sorenson was never close to Zain, and some of the things Zain did to him made me cringe. Zain brutalized his competition, Jason just toys with his.
After Jason's recent complete and utter domination of the #2 and #3 guys at 157, I started to wonder. Has there ever been a larger gap between the #1 guy and the field? What do people think? David Taylor's senior year? Not sure. Curious to hear people's thoughts.
WE ARE!!!
I considered Zain, but I disagree. While I never thought he would lose, Sorensen was closer to Zain than either Deakin or Berger are to Nolf. Barring injury (knock on wood), there is absolutely zero chance that either one of those two could beat Nolf. I'd have given Sorensen maybe a 1 to 2% shot at an upset with Zain.
No but that doesn't make the reverse true.So let me ask you...do you believe the gap from Zain to Sorensen was bigger than Nolf to Berger or Deakin?
Also for 2 years nobody could handle The Ruth.
The gap is not just wrestling skills. It is mental. How hard it must be to picture yourself beating Jason: yet that is what is needed to have a chance.After Jason's recent complete and utter domination of the #2 and #3 guys at 157, I started to wonder. Has there ever been a larger gap between the #1 guy and the field? What do people think? David Taylor's senior year? Not sure. Curious to hear people's thoughts.
WE ARE!!!
But Dake was better because he gained weightSome guy named Cael was 40-0 with 23 pins, 11 TFs, 2 major decs, and two forfeits in 2002. Both regular decisions were to Jon Trenge.
No but that doesn't make the reverse true.
If Sorensen couldn't win that home OT match, that's your answer. He couldn't beat Zain when he attacked or when he played. defense first.
BTW, Zain also majored Deakin.
So the difference between Zain and Jason is whether or not Deakin concentrated his stalling in one period?The circumstances were different when they each wrestled Deakin, but Zain had to really work to get the major on Deakin, while Deakin had to really "work" just to keep it a major against Nolf.
I don't know if it's an indication of the quality of their opponents or a result of their styles, but Zain definitely wrestled a lot more close matches than Nolf (Sorenson @ CHA and Collica in 2017, Sorenson at 2018 B1Gs).
One night I recall Taco Bell giving Ed issues
So the difference between Zain and Jason is whether or not Deakin concentrated his stalling in one period?
PS, who won the Most Dominant Awards?
Pantaleo would disagree.Zain.
And no. I'd say the difference is that Zain wrestled more close matches than Nolf.
My entire point is that this is a distinction without a difference. This confirmed that for me.Wrestlestat has all the data you want.
Pantaleo was Nolf's only 1 score match since his freshman year. Zain had the three I referenced above.
I'm not sure what specific data you want, but this isn't a 100% objective data-driven thing. Part of it is an eye-ball test, subjective opinion.
In my opinion, Sorenson was closer to beating Zain than any of Nolf's opponents have been (excluding the first year on the mat for each, in which they both had guys they went 1-2 against). Sorenson held Zain to a decision 3 times in 2017 and 2018 with 2 of those matches being victories of 2 points or less.
Zain is an all-timer. But so is Nolf. And in my opinion, Sorenson was closer to Zain than anyone was to Nolf (again, excluding the first year on the mat for each).
46/48 message are related to JO.Two of the 3 years JO won NCAA titles, he did not give up a single offensive point.
Two of the 3 years JO won NCAA titles, he did not give up a single offensive point.
46/48 message are related to JO.
Are you really JO or his mom?
That was widely rumored, but flatly denied by Zain's father.Only when he had the flu
Jordan Oliver's 3rd NCAA title is news to Jordan Oliver.Two of the 3 years JO won NCAA titles, he did not give up a single offensive point.