But against top talent with better closing speed they won’t be completions but interceptions.I'll take those 50+ yard completions, even if the WR has to slow down a bit.
Arm talent and strength is way down the list of problems for Allar.
But against top talent with better closing speed they won’t be completions but interceptions.I'll take those 50+ yard completions, even if the WR has to slow down a bit.
Arm talent and strength is way down the list of problems for Allar.
I agree....and in that case, the WR was so open that underthrowing it enough to make sure you don't overthrow it was the right move. But we've seen the underthrow consistently so he is just late or misjudging. Or, like Trace, it was done on purpose because the WR has the advantage over the defender if he is single covered. A guy like Fleming, big and strong, should be able to beat the guy to the ball.If you watch a replay of that long TD throw (you can watch it on YouTube) you’ll see that Allar did not even put 100% into the throw and it still went 60 yards in the air. There is a lot of power in that arm.
These games are scheduled so far in the past it is hard to say what a team is going to be 4-5 years from the day it is scheduled. It is quite possible this game was scheduled when Sean Lewis was putting in work for the Golden Flashes before he scooted to Colorado with Prime Time. In fact even if the game was scheduled in 2019, Kent State was a much better team than Bowling Green.One game was enough. Two was too many.
You're right. And there's no telling if the in conference team will be any good ! But there are teams with history, so I'm not guessing UMass will be tough when we play them.So one comment on this:
This wasn't an FCS school. Kent State plays in the MAC. MAC schools play big time games every year. NIU beat ND this year. Bowling Green played right with both PSU and TAMU. Furthermore, Kent State played in the MAC championship game in 2021 and won 7 games (and a bowl game) in 2019. The point being that this is not a perpetually horrible program and has been pointed out these series are scheduled far enough in advance that there is no way to know whether an OOC opponent will be good or bad when you actually play them.
Other have already stated that this is how lower level programs fund themselves.
Nothing worse than a WR wide open and the QB overthrows him by a yard or 2.I agree....and in that case, the WR was so open that underthrowing it enough to make sure you don't overthrow it was the right move. But we've seen the underthrow consistently so he is just late or misjudging. Or, like Trace, it was done on purpose because the WR has the advantage over the defender if he is single covered. A guy like Fleming, big and strong, should be able to beat the guy to the ball.
Way under thrown. Receiver came to a full stop and had to shed a tackle to score. Two yards further and it’s an easy TD.
Against WVU same play but the receiver was tackled. That one should have also been a TD,
The adage is to under throw short passes but over throw long ones to prevent interceptions. I certainly understand throwing it a tad short if the receiver is wide open to be sure to get the completion bug not five yards short.
Keep doing that against top talent and those big completions turn into interceptions.
Todd Blackledge once said on one of his broadcasts that he was coached to hit wide open receiver on the numbers and to NOT get fancy with a beautiful lead pass. This was apparently a Paterno dictumI agree....and in that case, the WR was so open that underthrowing it enough to make sure you don't overthrow it was the right move. But we've seen the underthrow consistently so he is just late or misjudging. Or, like Trace, it was done on purpose because the WR has the advantage over the defender if he is single covered. A guy like Fleming, big and strong, should be able to beat the guy to the ball.
ha! I think times have changed. But to your point, this particular throw was what you wanted. The WR was wide open and there was no need to hit him in stride. So his pass was perfectly affective because it resulted in a TD. In previous games, with long throws, not so much.Todd Blackledge once said on one of his broadcasts that he was coached to hit wide open receiver on the numbers and to NOT get fancy with a beautiful lead pass. This was apparently a Paterno dictum
It was a TD because it was against a slow, lower division d-back. Try that against Ohio State or Washington and it is an interception.ha! I think times have changed. But to your point, this particular throw was what you wanted. The WR was wide open and there was no need to hit him in stride. So his pass was perfectly affective because it resulted in a TD. In previous games, with long throws, not so much.
Agreed. But he wasn't throwing against them. It is situational. So he made the correct throw at that time. But to your point, and the reason why I posted, that appears to be a weakness because almost all of his long tosses have been short.It was a TD because it was against a slow, lower division d-back. Try that against Ohio State or Washington and it is an interception.
These games are about building skills and habits. Seriously under throwing a wide open receiver isn’t a good one.Agreed. But he wasn't throwing against them. It is situational. So he made the correct throw at that time. But to your point, and the reason why I posted, that appears to be a weakness because almost all of his long tosses have been short.
That's my concern as well. If he is coached up to under throw what happens when say Evans only has a half step on the defender and not 4-5 yards? At some point against our best competition (USC and OSU) Allar is going to have to drop it right in there from 60 yards. In fact he probably needs to do the opposite and lead Omari a bit so he could potentially accelerate past the defender another half step while the ball is in flight. Can he do that? Does he even practice that? I would hope/think he does. We have to take shots like this and versus the top teams on our schedule there won't be a lot of separation.But against top talent with better closing speed they won’t be completions but interceptions.
I don't know. I am not going to criticize a QB for throwing for a 59-yard TD pass. The situation called for what he did. Illinois, et all, will be a different matter.These games are about building skills and habits. Seriously under throwing a wide open receiver isn’t a good one.
I have never seen a more overdrmatic take on a long TD throw. Worst case scenario it gets picked off at the 5 yard line.These games are about building skills and habits. Seriously under throwing a wide open receiver isn’t a good one.
It's not over dramatic if Allar can't deliver a 60 yard pass on the money and is always underthrown.I have never seen a more overdrmatic take on a long TD throw. Worst case scenario it gets picked off at the 5 yard line.
This pass was at minimum five yards short, probably 7-8. It would not have been a completion against any single Big Ten opponent.I have never seen a more overdrmatic take on a long TD throw. Worst case scenario it gets picked off at the 5 yard line.
It was a TD because it was against a slow, lower division d-back. Try that against Ohio State or Washington and it is an interception.
718 yards of offense sounds impressive until you look at the NCAA stats that show Kent State is giving up an average of 608 yds per game.Hard to have any real takeaways. But I have one major takeaway. This game was a travesty. Kent was totally overmatched. I felt horrible for Kent's starting QB for getting hurt in play, what, three? The second team QB got hurt as well but it seemed that could have happened anytime against any team. So Kent is down two QBs and is completely overwhelmed. It is hard for me to accept that Kent let themselves get to this level and PSU (Tenn) played them. I feel bad for those kids. To their credit, they fought to the end but I felt myself feeling really sad for them. it was hard to watch, honestly.
Also, sad that Cam got hurt in this meaningless game. It was more a practice than a game. I hope he's OK as that didn't look good at all. Anyone have an update?
- A friend told me he didn't think Allar improved much from last year. I feel like I must be watching a different Allar. Allar is very consistent and very efficient. He's really shown great in pocket awareness and has extended plays while still looking downfield. Plus, he seems to run when it makes sense and he can get a good gain or the first down or staying back and hoping a WR will uncover.
- He also put the ball into some very small holes over defenders.
- He seems to throw his long balls short. we got a TD but the WR was way underthrown. That seems to be the only consistent complaint I have.
- I am more concerned with why the WRs aren't getting open against Kent. I think the plan was to get more people involved and perhaps that is it. But his stat line is pretty darn good 17 of 29 for 309 yards and zero INTs while rushing for 26. 3 Tuddies.
- WTF on Beaus INT? I noted he got benched until it was mop-up time. we then moved to a wildcat with Warren, which worked great.
- Better to reserve/surprise the Warren Wildcat or make teams prepare for it? IDK, but it sure looked good.
- Hard to complain about anything when the team puts up 718 total yards and gives up only 67. 40 first downs.
- seven penalties for 67 yards. That is way too many.
- WR watched: Evans, Clifford, Flemming, Wallace, Ivey, Denmark
- Warren looked great as did Reynolds and Dinkins. Reynolds is going to be great. We are in good shape at TE especially when Rapp gets back. Reynolds looks like a special athlete: big, strong, fast, great verticle. And he's still very young.
- I am still seeing very few bubble screens except to Warren. Why?
- Defense looked fine but it is hard to judge them against a Kent and their third-team QB. Again, Kent kids played hard.
I have never seen a more overdrmatic take on a long TD throw. Worst case scenario it gets picked off at the 5 yard line.
See Northern Illinois and James Madison.You realize, it has become the norm. Bowling Green just did the same thing. They'll be okay. Kent State is down 2 QB's.
Spot on. I….we…..have no idea how good we are. WVU was the only decent competition.718 yards of offense sounds impressive until you look at the NCAA stats that show Kent State is giving up an average of 608 yds per game.
Pitt 567 yds
St Francis 408 yds
Tennessee 740 yds
PSU 718 yds
My question is how did we only score 56 points?
I have no idea if Allar, the OL, and WRs are improved. PSU hasn't played a top 100 defense and there are only 133 teams.
West Virginia 102nd, 406 yds per game
Bowling Green 110th, 416 yds per game
Kent State 133rd, 608 yds per game
So how can we say the offense has improved? IMO it's way too early.
P.S. Both Warren & Reynolds made spectacular catches regardless of who the opponent was. Also, even though it's only 3 games it seems clear that Evans is our #2 WR and seems to have the ability to stretch the field. We'll see if better opponents will be more physical with him at the LOS.
This is a silly argument. Your throw should be good enough to get there but no harder for your WR to catch than necessary. When you WR has multiple steps on a DB you can hang it up there for them to run under. No reason to try to time it perfectly on a rope where they might have to lay out to catch it.This pass was at minimum five yards short, probably 7-8. It would not have been a completion against any single Big Ten opponent. Not one.
One correction. I suspect Kent needs their games vs teams like Tenn & PSU to pay for football much less other sports.Bottom line Kent state on scholarship is paying 85 kids- 85 kids that will graduate with little to no debt.
These "move up" games against the big boys pay for volleyball, baseball golf etc.
Do not feel bad-
These Kent state kids can say I played against Tennessee and PSU.
Not I played against
Monmouth and Colgate
Three reasons:My question is how did we only score 56 points?
I never said it had to be perfect. In fact, I stated if it was two yards short that was fine. But it was 7-8 yds short.This is a silly argument. Your throw should be good enough to get there but no harder for your WR to catch than necessary. When you WR has multiple steps on a DB you can hang it up there for them to run under. No reason to try to time it perfectly on a rope where they might have to lay out to catch it.
Same idea of not firing a fastball at a TE who is standing by himself in the endzone. Just get it there in an easy to catch fashion.
Three reasons:
1) No defensive scores (zero turnovers)
2) No ST scores
3) Had horrible field position most of the day. Due to a couple bad turnovers
718 yards is really good against anyone and is significantly better than their other opponents.
718 yards of offense sounds impressive until you look at the NCAA stats that show Kent State is giving up an average of 60 the lack of comparative information, you can't bitch about an all time record. We've played a lot of stinkers over the years and this was still the best we ever did.
I know next year there will be a reduction of roster size to I believe 105. Will there be any change to the # of scholarships allowed? That might have an impact.I agree that this spreads the talent around. I think more kids will get opportunities in this area versus the previous era of cfb. We are seeing some very interesting results this year. Notre Dame and North Carolina both lost to G5 teams. Oregon had trouble two weeks in a row. We had our own issues with Bowling Green.
An under thrown pass like that also often results in a pass interference penalty.I have never seen a more overdrmatic take on a long TD throw. Worst case scenario it gets picked off at the 5 yard line.
yep and I put that in my original post. There is just no measure because Kent was so bad. Having said that, given the lack of comparative information, you can't bitch about an all time record. We've played a lot of stinkers over the years and this was still the best we ever did.718 yards of offense sounds impressive until you look at the NCAA stats that show Kent State is giving up an average of 608 yds per game.
Pitt 567 yds
St Francis 408 yds
Tennessee 740 yds
PSU 718 yds
My question is how did we only score 56 points?
I have no idea if Allar, the OL, and WRs are improved. PSU hasn't played a top 100 defense and there are only 133 teams.
West Virginia 102nd, 406 yds per game
Bowling Green 110th, 416 yds per game
Kent State 133rd, 608 yds per game
So how can we say the offense has improved? IMO it's way too early.
P.S. Both Warren & Reynolds made spectacular catches regardless of who the opponent was. Also, even though it's only 3 games it seems clear that Evans is our #2 WR and seems to have the ability to stretch the field. We'll see if better opponents will be more physical with him at the LOS.
CJF in this week's presser alluded that he wants those very long passes underthrown. As you said, not a good idea against teams with much better secondary players who can close faster.Agreed. But he wasn't throwing against them. It is situational. So he made the correct throw at that time. But to your point, and the reason why I posted, that appears to be a weakness because almost all of his long tosses have been short.
Funny that the poster child of this was Trace McSorely. He ALWAYS underthrew his long passes. But he also had several NFL personalities and defenses that were obsessed with trying to stop #26. But God forbid anyone trash Trace!CJF in this week's presser alluded that he wants those very long passes underthrown. As you said, not a good idea against teams with much better secondary players who can close faster.
Tennessee had 740 yards718 yards is really good against anyone and is significantly better than their other opponents.
Kent St. opened the season vs. Pitt so that makes three travel games to teams from the top 4 conferences.It’s a fine line. Without those games Kent doesn’t have a program. That’s where they get the money. Back to back wasn’t smart.
I had never heard this, but Franklin said in his presser that he specifically asks his QBs to underthrow deep balls. Not sure I agree, but the logic is justifiable. Franklin says if you throw them short the WR can still make a play on them or you can draw the PI.
Great coaching no wonder PSU cannot beat UM an OSU. Let's get more 2 Qb formations as well that will get PSU past OSU and UM.CJF in this week's presser alluded that he wants those very long passes underthrown. As you said, not a good idea against teams with much better secondary players who can close faster.
Funny, Kent has probably the most diffiult strength of schedules right now. They've played Pitt, PSU and Tenn. PSU and Tenn are top ten ranked and undefeated. Pitt is also undefeated. Worse, against us, they lost their starting QB on the third play and their second-team QB in the second quarter. Dang!Kent St. opened the season vs. Pitt so that makes three travel games to teams from the top 4 conferences.
(Notice how avoided calling Pitt a top team)
Without trying in the second halfTennessee had 740 yards
Tennessee also kicked a needless onside kick.Tennessee had 740 yards