OSU player not suspended for 1st half
- Thread starter sss
- Start date
I'm still waiting for Brandon Smith to be reinstated from his bogus targeting call, while diving for an interception against Michigan a few years back
Still waiting for you to list out everything that HAS decided the outcome of a game (as step 1 in illustrating your LandoLogic) ...
Because you refuse to admit you're wrong
Just like Franklin's apology
Just like the Big Ten statement admitting missed calls in the Ohio State-Nebraska game when they never said it was wrong in the Minnesota Michigan game
I'm consistently proven correct and it drives you insane
Just like this--you know that officiating has never determined a game but started a fight you were never going to win--per usual
i
If you go back and look at the history , you never wanted us in the B10. And in 1994, you guys all made it clear again when you voted Nebraska national champions, after we had beaten you by 49 points. ( and if we hadn't taken out our starters in the 3rd quarter, it could have been 100) And now all the B10 people say pull for each other! Yeah sure!
You're still mad about something from 30 years ago--move on
Voting for a champion was stupid anyone and of course bias was involved
4 pages on a safety who was grilled like a rotisserie chicken against Oregon and has been out of position and lost for the last 8 quarters of this season. Shaking my head.
Worry about #44 and #33, their actual problem makers.
Or just do what Landon Tengwall said to do: Run the god damn football for 4 quarters and beat them the Michigan way.
Worry about #44 and #33, their actual problem makers.
Or just do what Landon Tengwall said to do: Run the god damn football for 4 quarters and beat them the Michigan way.
Still waiting for you to list out everything that HAS decided the outcome of a game (as step 1 in illustrating your LandoLogic) ...
Or just admit you were wrong, like every other time we've disagreed.
You poor thing ... you're stuck not being able to support your LandoLogic AGAIN.
I literally gave you 2 of the infinite number of times you were wrong yet you still won't own it
This is why you need to fight to Kaspy
Still waiting for you to list out everything that HAS decided the outcome of a game (as step 1 in illustrating your LandoLogic) ...
Or just admit you were wrong, like every other time we've disagreed.
You poor thing ... you're stuck not being able to support your LandoLogic AGAIN. I've always laid out the logic and factual basis for my arguments ... you've NEVER been able to do so ... hence the reason you're always wrong. This time is just more of the same. LandoLogic.
Because it doesn't matter what I say--you'll twist it
I'm waiting for you to admit you've always been wrong as the Big Ten statement today proved regarding Minnesota/Michigan and the post game presser proved about the horrible PR decision. Once again, the world proves you wrong so you try to attack me with you "LandoLogic" BS instead of just admitting you're clueless
Still waiting for you to list out everything that HAS decided the outcome of a game (as step 1 in illustrating your LandoLogic) ...
Or just admit you were wrong, like every other time we've disagreed.
You poor thing ... you're stuck not being able to support your LandoLogic AGAIN. I've always laid out the logic and factual basis for my arguments ... you've NEVER been able to do so ... hence the reason you're always wrong. This time is just more of the same. LandoLogic.
I use your exact words to show you're wrong, and you cry that your words have been twisted. You poor thing. You can't even create a logical syllogism. No lawyer, in the history of civilization, has ever been scared to present their logical argument because they were afraid someone else would "twist it" (by presenting sound logic in retort). #NorthwesternElementarySchoolLaw
Still waiting for you to admit you were wrong. You can attack me all you want. You just know you're inferior and can't actually win an argument.
Still waiting for you to list out everything that HAS decided the outcome of a game (as step 1 in illustrating your LandoLogic) ...
Or just admit you were wrong, like every other time we've disagreed.
No one's attacking you ... I'm trying to get you to actually support one of your arguments ... for once. This should be a simple task. For anyone. Especially for a lawyer who graduated from Northwestern. It's a simple logical syllogism that would take you less than a minute to think about and write out, if you had any logical backing behind your claim.
In the alternative, I'm presenting you with the opportunity to show everyone what DOES affect the outcome of a game, since you claim reffing does not (despite you equating a missed ref call to a missed tackle, a missed block or a missed throw ... the latter 3 things would all seem to affect the outcomes of games).
Again, if you had any idea what you were talking about, you could have answered this many times over and put this whole thing to bed, rather than stalling and claiming that presenting your exact words is somehow twisting your words.
See...you're desperate at this point
I'll answer it as soon as you admit you were obviously wrong about the presser and the Big Ten admitting they were wrong about the offside on the kickoff. That was already true but the last couple days proved it beyond any doubt which is why you're so desperate here.
It must suck to never win
Still waiting for you to list out everything that HAS decided the outcome of a game (as step 1 in illustrating your LandoLogic) ...
Or just admit you were wrong, like every other time we've disagreed.
Kid, stop trying to change the subject. We're talking about reffing deciding the outcome of a game (and general impact of reffing on a game). You're sadly trying to say "look over there!" even though you failed at that, too. It's sad.
List out the things that have decided the outcome of a football game ... and ... GO!!!
Huge numbers of people, including people who post here, would absolutely love to get out of the B2G league. And have been saying so for years.
Lol and go where? Anyone that has ever said they wanted to leave the Big Ten is....be better
Keep in mind that football is only 1 sport played in the "B2G". Is it the B2G for wrestling? Winning the B1G in football has just gotten much harder. Wait until you go to Eugene to play Oregon. Look for USC to become a power. The idea of a "B2G" is over, if it ever existed. What league would you like to join? You would be leaving one of the 2 top conferences in the country.
They all wanted to join the ACC because they thought we'd run that league. Which was beyond stupid then and even worse now
We appreciate you finally admitting penalty calls have decided football games. Crazy to see you cave like this, and then run to "but what about this other topic ..."? You finally gave up. The Lando "nuh uh machine" has been broken.
Last edited:
I'm sure OSU submits to the conference, I admit I don't know for sure, but I highly doubt there is a vote of all the schools to determine if the Big 10 office submits to NCAA.
The B1G didn't make the reversal, it's submitted to the NCAA who made the reversal. The B1G needs to submit it on OSUs behalf. I believe the headline of the B1G making the reversal is incorrect, the article even states they submitted it to the NCAA. It does appear that Indiana also had a reversal that was submitted by the B1G earlier this year.
Big Ten submits CJ West’s targeting for review, national coordinator rescinds first-half suspension
West missed all but one play of the second half against UCLA on Sept. 14.
www.idsnews.com
You answer makes zero sense - I guess in Lando bizzaro world it does but not in the real one.
It 100% makes sense--could Mizzou have stopped Colorado on the 5th down, yes or no?
He is one bizarre little troll - now he's jabbering about how Mizzou "could have stopped them on 5th Down". Now think about the lack of cognitive capacity required to make such an inane statement.
So if OSU is driving at the end of the game down 4 and PSU stops them on 4th down, but the B10 officials give OSU a 5th down and they score winning as time expires it’s PSU’s fault they didn’t stop them on 5th down? How about if the refs decide that OSU gets 5 downs the entire game and PSU stops them on 4th down every time, but OSU scores on 5th down 3 times to win 21-17 that is also PSU’s fault they didn’t stop them? Could PSU have stopped them? Sure. Should they have to to win? Wow bro you need to be evaluated.
He has been evaluated. And deemed unfit for discussion. And put on ignore.
As should everyone put him on ignore and save us sane people the pain of seeing page after page of stupid responses to a stupid guy.
Fault? Not sure about fault but they could have stopped them
Why are you saying "decide"? That indicates it was intentional--that's the stuff that has to stop
But you answered the questions correctly. "Sure"--they could have stopped them. In life, you have to overcome things and often times that's things beyond your control
Again, the refs have never determined the outcome of a game. They may have UNINTENTIONALLY made it more difficult but they've never determined who won
So you’re saying the refs may have unintentionally made it MORE DIFFICULT, but they don’t affect the outcome of a game. Yep you convinced me the refs never affect the outcome of a game. 🤪
Countless factors make the game more difficult--some controlled, some outside your control
Teams only control what they can do--which is make that call or non-call irrelevant
Again, refs have never determined the outcome of a game--you can cry about that reality all you want--I know many here like excuses
This a$$hole is so stupid it's thoroughly amusing - especially the fact that he is self-impressed with his inane arguments while everyone else is laughing at him. So let me get this straight - Mizzou stops Colorado under the actual Rulebook, but the Officials INCORRECTLY OUTSIDE THE RULEBOOK give Colorado the ball for another play with 2 seconds remaining when the ball actually should have been Mizzou's possession under the ACTUAL RULES. Colorado scores on the last play of the game running a play COMPLETELY OUTSIDE THE RULEBOOK which only happened as a result of an INCORRECT CALL BY THE OFFICIALS.... But according to dipshit, the Officials didn't factually change the result of the game???
Moron's argument that the Officials weren't responsible for changing the result of the game goes like this.... - "Officials can't impact the result of the game; therefore, they didn't impact the result of the game.". The most hilarious part is that moron douche-boy actually believes this is powerful argumentation!
You blame the officials for everything so....
The reps didn't determine the outcome--Mizzou could have stopped them--which everyone has acknowledged. I win simply on that ignoring the reality is one play never determines who wins. Ever. The next time a game is only one play you let me know.
Did Mizzou have the opportunity to stop them?
I've said throughout that game is the closest we'll ever get to it but Mizzou had a chance to make the mistake irrelevant. Fact--not opinion.
His latest inanity repeated multiple times is - one play cannot determine a game or change its result..... Provably false as a single play run with 2 seconds on the clock, the final play of the game AND an offensive possession granted to Colorado by the Officials clearly OUTSIDE THE RULEBOOK when it clearly was Mizzou's ball BY THE ACTUAL RULES absolutely changed the outcome of the game as the score of the game prior to the last ILLEGAL snap of the game was Mizzou 31 - Colorado 27 which became Colorado 33 - Mizzou 31 after the OFFICIALS granted Colorado a 5th Down OUTSIDE THE RULEBOOK. Those are something called FACTS - all of which indicate that the final play of the game, an ILLEGITIMATE offensive snap by Colorado granted OUTSIDE THE RULEBOOK BY THE OFFICIALS, changed the outcome of the game. IOW, a single play ILLEGITIMATELY granted to Colorado OUTSIDE THE RULEBOOK BY THE OFFICIALS absolutely changed the outcome of the game. This is something known as a "FACT", but toolboy keeps inanely making falsely labeled "factual arguments" such as: i) Officials can never change the outcome of a game; therefore, Officials didn't change the outcome of the game, OR ii) A single play cannot determine the outcome of a game; therefore, this play didn't change the outcome of the game. These are nothing more than self serving inanities and are not legitimate arguments, let alone factual arguments, of any kind. The moron keeps misusing the terms "fact" and "factual" continually proving what a blithering and insufferable moronic a-hole he is.
Similar threads
