OSU player not suspended for 1st half
- Thread starter sss
- Start date
I'm still waiting for Brandon Smith to be reinstated from his bogus targeting call, while diving for an interception against Michigan a few years back
Still waiting for you to list out everything that HAS decided the outcome of a game (as step 1 in illustrating your LandoLogic) ...
Because you refuse to admit you're wrong
Just like Franklin's apology
Just like the Big Ten statement admitting missed calls in the Ohio State-Nebraska game when they never said it was wrong in the Minnesota Michigan game
I'm consistently proven correct and it drives you insane
Just like this--you know that officiating has never determined a game but started a fight you were never going to win--per usual
i
If you go back and look at the history , you never wanted us in the B10. And in 1994, you guys all made it clear again when you voted Nebraska national champions, after we had beaten you by 49 points. ( and if we hadn't taken out our starters in the 3rd quarter, it could have been 100) And now all the B10 people say pull for each other! Yeah sure!
You're still mad about something from 30 years ago--move on
Voting for a champion was stupid anyone and of course bias was involved
4 pages on a safety who was grilled like a rotisserie chicken against Oregon and has been out of position and lost for the last 8 quarters of this season. Shaking my head.
Worry about #44 and #33, their actual problem makers.
Or just do what Landon Tengwall said to do: Run the god damn football for 4 quarters and beat them the Michigan way.
Worry about #44 and #33, their actual problem makers.
Or just do what Landon Tengwall said to do: Run the god damn football for 4 quarters and beat them the Michigan way.
Still waiting for you to list out everything that HAS decided the outcome of a game (as step 1 in illustrating your LandoLogic) ...
Or just admit you were wrong, like every other time we've disagreed.
You poor thing ... you're stuck not being able to support your LandoLogic AGAIN.
I literally gave you 2 of the infinite number of times you were wrong yet you still won't own it
This is why you need to fight to Kaspy
Still waiting for you to list out everything that HAS decided the outcome of a game (as step 1 in illustrating your LandoLogic) ...
Or just admit you were wrong, like every other time we've disagreed.
You poor thing ... you're stuck not being able to support your LandoLogic AGAIN. I've always laid out the logic and factual basis for my arguments ... you've NEVER been able to do so ... hence the reason you're always wrong. This time is just more of the same. LandoLogic.
Because it doesn't matter what I say--you'll twist it
I'm waiting for you to admit you've always been wrong as the Big Ten statement today proved regarding Minnesota/Michigan and the post game presser proved about the horrible PR decision. Once again, the world proves you wrong so you try to attack me with you "LandoLogic" BS instead of just admitting you're clueless
Still waiting for you to list out everything that HAS decided the outcome of a game (as step 1 in illustrating your LandoLogic) ...
Or just admit you were wrong, like every other time we've disagreed.
You poor thing ... you're stuck not being able to support your LandoLogic AGAIN. I've always laid out the logic and factual basis for my arguments ... you've NEVER been able to do so ... hence the reason you're always wrong. This time is just more of the same. LandoLogic.
I use your exact words to show you're wrong, and you cry that your words have been twisted. You poor thing. You can't even create a logical syllogism. No lawyer, in the history of civilization, has ever been scared to present their logical argument because they were afraid someone else would "twist it" (by presenting sound logic in retort). #NorthwesternElementarySchoolLaw
Still waiting for you to admit you were wrong. You can attack me all you want. You just know you're inferior and can't actually win an argument.
Still waiting for you to list out everything that HAS decided the outcome of a game (as step 1 in illustrating your LandoLogic) ...
Or just admit you were wrong, like every other time we've disagreed.
No one's attacking you ... I'm trying to get you to actually support one of your arguments ... for once. This should be a simple task. For anyone. Especially for a lawyer who graduated from Northwestern. It's a simple logical syllogism that would take you less than a minute to think about and write out, if you had any logical backing behind your claim.
In the alternative, I'm presenting you with the opportunity to show everyone what DOES affect the outcome of a game, since you claim reffing does not (despite you equating a missed ref call to a missed tackle, a missed block or a missed throw ... the latter 3 things would all seem to affect the outcomes of games).
Again, if you had any idea what you were talking about, you could have answered this many times over and put this whole thing to bed, rather than stalling and claiming that presenting your exact words is somehow twisting your words.
See...you're desperate at this point
I'll answer it as soon as you admit you were obviously wrong about the presser and the Big Ten admitting they were wrong about the offside on the kickoff. That was already true but the last couple days proved it beyond any doubt which is why you're so desperate here.
It must suck to never win
Still waiting for you to list out everything that HAS decided the outcome of a game (as step 1 in illustrating your LandoLogic) ...
Or just admit you were wrong, like every other time we've disagreed.
Kid, stop trying to change the subject. We're talking about reffing deciding the outcome of a game (and general impact of reffing on a game). You're sadly trying to say "look over there!" even though you failed at that, too. It's sad.
List out the things that have decided the outcome of a football game ... and ... GO!!!
Similar threads
