ADVERTISEMENT

OSU player not suspended for 1st half

His latest inanity repeated multiple times is - one play cannot determine a game or change its result..... Provably false as a single play run with 2 seconds on the clock, the final play of the game AND an offensive possession granted to Colorado by the Officials clearly OUTSIDE THE RULEBOOK when it clearly was Mizzou's ball BY THE ACTUAL RULES absolutely changed the outcome of the game as the score of the game prior to the last ILLEGAL snap of the game was Mizzou 31 - Colorado 27 which became Colorado 33 - Mizzou 31 after the OFFICIALS granted Colorado a 5th Down OUTSIDE THE RULEBOOK. Those are something called FACTS - all of which indicate that the final play of the game, an ILLEGITIMATE offensive snap by Colorado granted OUTSIDE THE RULEBOOK BY THE OFFICIALS, changed the outcome of the game. IOW, a single play ILLEGITIMATELY granted to Colorado OUTSIDE THE RULEBOOK BY THE OFFICIALS absolutely changed the outcome of the game. This is something known as a "FACT", but toolboy keeps inanely making falsely labeled "factual arguments" such as: i) Officials can never change the outcome of a game; therefore, Officials didn't change the outcome of the game, OR ii) A single play cannot determine the outcome of a game; therefore, this play didn't change the outcome of the game. These are nothing more than self serving inanities and are not legitimate arguments, let alone factual arguments, of any kind. The moron keeps misusing the terms "fact" and "factual" continually proving what a blithering and insufferable moronic a-hole he is.
That must have been the only play of the entire game
Misusing "fact" and "factual"--I hope someone takes that one.
 
That must have been the only play of the entire game
Misusing "fact" and "factual"--I hope someone takes that one.
Like a parrot just repeating the same thing over and over saying something is fact when it is clearly not. Opinions are like Lando everyone has one. I’ve never put anyone on ignore since I do appreciate different opinions, but for this asshat I’ll make an exception. One play can absolutely decide a game just ask the Chicago Bears. This idiot is such a douche canoe polluting every thread and like a spoiled little kid has to get the last word. I can picture his Mom bringing him a snack in the basement so he doesn’t miss a thread. Time to put you on ignore troll.
 
Like a parrot just repeating the same thing over and over saying something is fact when it is clearly not. Opinions are like Lando everyone has one. I’ve never put anyone on ignore since I do appreciate different opinions, but for this asshat I’ll make an exception. One play can absolutely decide a game just ask the Chicago Bears. This idiot is such a douche canoe polluting every thread and like a spoiled little kid has to get the last word. I can picture his Mom bringing him a snack in the basement so he doesn’t miss a thread. Time to put you on ignore troll.
How is it not a fact that Missouri had the opportunity to stop them?
The Bears played like garbage for the majority of the game but you believe they lost because of the Hail Mary?
I love when people ramble about putting me on ignore--if you were going to ignore me you'd do it and not cry about it while quoting me
 
Don't forget the ref standing in perfect position and staring at the 'bounce pass' then calling it complete.

SMH.....
For Christ’s sake, it is deliberate and all on purpose…with increased frequency and brazenness post-Sandusky (like the TD at Nebraska that was in end zone by a full yard, reviewed in replay booth and skies a fumble.). We will need to overcome this every time a Big10 officiating crew calls our game.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: LandoComando
Like a parrot just repeating the same thing over and over saying something is fact when it is clearly not. Opinions are like Lando everyone has one. I’ve never put anyone on ignore since I do appreciate different opinions, but for this asshat I’ll make an exception. One play can absolutely decide a game just ask the Chicago Bears. This idiot is such a douche canoe polluting every thread and like a spoiled little kid has to get the last word. I can picture his Mom bringing him a snack in the basement so he doesn’t miss a thread. Time to put you on ignore troll.

His latest inanity is making the completely extraneous statement that Missouri could have stopped them on the play... - completely irrelevant to the topic of wether "a play" and/or Officials' objectively proven wrong calls can change the result of a game.

In the game being discussed:

- Officials INCORRECTLY awarded Colorado a "5th Down" outside the NCAA Rulebook with only 2 seconds remaining in the game and the clock stopped. Missouri was leading the game 31-27 prior to Colorado running a play that they were not entitled to under the Rulebook and were only able to run this ILLEGITIMATE play via the beyond egregiously wrong call of the Officials. These are all undeniable FACTS.
- Colorado scored on the final play of the game on a play they were not entitled to run under the RULEBOOK and were only allowed to run the ILLEGITIMATE play via the egregiously wrong actions of the Officials. The Officials-enabled illegitimate "play" changed the score to 33-31 in Colorado's favor. Again, an undisputed FACT.
- "The Play" changed the outcome from a Missouri win to a Missouri loss. Again, an undisputed fact.
- The play was outside the Rulebook and only happened due to the egregiously wrong call of the Officials. Again, undisputed facts.

Bozo brains counter to all of these undeniable and indisputable FACTS is to make a completely extraneous statement that has ZERO to do with refuting any of these undeniable and irrefutable FACTS, but somehow believes his response refutes any of the facts listed regarding the topic being discussed. Diametrically wrong yet again on BOTH of the inane claims he made (i.e., "an Official's provably wrong call can't impact the outcome of a game" and "a play can't change the outcome of a game"), but keeps ranting that he's not diametrically wrong.... and has proven he's right by repeating his inanities over and over- what a surprise.
 
His latest inanity is making the completely extraneous statement that Missouri could have stopped them on the play... - completely irrelevant to the topic of wether "a play" and/or Officials' objectively proven wrong calls can change the result of a game.

In the game being discussed:

- Officials INCORRECTLY awarded Colorado a "5th Down" outside the NCAA Rulebook with only 2 seconds remaining in the game and the clock stopped. Missouri was leading the game 31-27 prior to Colorado running a play that they were not entitled to under the Rulebook and were only able to run this ILLEGITIMATE play via the beyond egregiously wrong call of the Officials. These are all undeniable FACTS.
- Colorado scored on the final play of the game on a play they were not entitled to run under the RULEBOOK and were only allowed to run the ILLEGITIMATE play via the egregiously wrong actions of the Officials. The Officials-enabled illegitimate "play" changed the score to 33-31 in Colorado's favor. Again, an undisputed FACT.
- "The Play" changed the outcome from a Missouri win to a Missouri loss. Again, an undisputed fact.
- The play was outside the Rulebook and only happened due to the egregiously wrong call of the Officials. Again, undisputed facts.

Bozo brains counter to all of these undeniable and indisputable FACTS is to make a completely extraneous statement that has ZERO to do with refuting any of these undeniable and irrefutable FACTS, but somehow believes his response refutes any of the facts listed regarding the topic being discussed. Diametrically wrong yet again on BOTH of the inane claims he made (i.e., "an Official's provably wrong call can't impact the outcome of a game" and "a play can't change the outcome of a game"), but keeps ranting that he's not diametrically wrong.... and has proven he's right by repeating his inanities over and over- what a surprise.
I see one major difference between what you post and what he posts - when proven wrong, Lando will acknowlege his error. You have never done so, you just keep spewing your shit.

You were commenting on how it was not dark on the west coast until 8 or so at the time of the USC game, it was pointed out to you that sunset was around 6:30. You didn't skip a beat and when right on spewing.

In a thread mentioning the Wisconsin game time, you stated emphatically that Madison, WI was a two hour difference from State College. When did Madison convert to the Mountain Time zone? Again, that was no deterrent to you continuing your verbal vomit.

You need to review your posts for statements that are DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSITE from the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LandoComando
His latest inanity is making the completely extraneous statement that Missouri could have stopped them on the play... - completely irrelevant to the topic of wether "a play" and/or Officials' objectively proven wrong calls can change the result of a game.

In the game being discussed:

- Officials INCORRECTLY awarded Colorado a "5th Down" outside the NCAA Rulebook with only 2 seconds remaining in the game and the clock stopped. Missouri was leading the game 31-27 prior to Colorado running a play that they were not entitled to under the Rulebook and were only able to run this ILLEGITIMATE play via the beyond egregiously wrong call of the Officials. These are all undeniable FACTS.
- Colorado scored on the final play of the game on a play they were not entitled to run under the RULEBOOK and were only allowed to run the ILLEGITIMATE play via the egregiously wrong actions of the Officials. The Officials-enabled illegitimate "play" changed the score to 33-31 in Colorado's favor. Again, an undisputed FACT.
- "The Play" changed the outcome from a Missouri win to a Missouri loss. Again, an undisputed fact.
- The play was outside the Rulebook and only happened due to the egregiously wrong call of the Officials. Again, undisputed facts.

Bozo brains counter to all of these undeniable and indisputable FACTS is to make a completely extraneous statement that has ZERO to do with refuting any of these undeniable and irrefutable FACTS, but somehow believes his response refutes any of the facts listed regarding the topic being discussed. Diametrically wrong yet again on BOTH of the inane claims he made (i.e., "an Official's provably wrong call can't impact the outcome of a game" and "a play can't change the outcome of a game"), but keeps ranting that he's not diametrically wrong.... and has proven he's right by repeating his inanities over and over- what a surprise.
LOL--completely irrelevant--it's not irrelevant--had they stopped them they win
That's not an opinion
 
I recall a game back in 2021 when the OSU was playing Minny in a close night game. The Ransom DB from the OSU totally lit up a Minny receiver on a crossing pattern and knocked him out! He launched, made helmet to helmet contact and no flag, with the receiver getting knocked out.

Does anyone else remember that play? That's biased officiating at it's best.
 
Did Mizzou have the opportunity to stop them?
I've said throughout that game is the closest we'll ever get to it but Mizzou had a chance to make the mistake irrelevant. Fact--not opinion.
You are seriously and consciously saying that the referees did not alter the outcome of that game?
 
You are seriously and consciously saying that the referees did not alter the outcome of that game?

He doesn't seem to understand what the term extraneous means. His drivel about Mizzou having a chance to stop a play that was outside the Rulebook and never should have occurred in the first place, but for the FACTUALLY WRONG CALL by the Officials, is completely and utterly extraneous to whether "the play" changed the result of the game - a play (the last of the game snapped with 2 seconds on a stopped clock) that should never have occured but for an egregiously WRONG CALL by the Officials and was utterly outside the Rulebook. He has a genuine mental problem that is sadly worsened by the fact that he is just plain dumb and literally lacks the cognitive capacity to understand that his statements about Mizzou having a chance to stop the play is COMPLETELY and UTTERLY extraneous to whether "the play" changed the outcome of the game AND THE FACT that the play should NEVER have occurred but for the egregious WRONG CALL by the Officials. The ball was snapped by Colorado completely outside the Rulebook and the only reason Colorado was allowed to snap the ball was because they were ENABLED to snap the ILLEGITIMATE play by the Officials.
 
I see one major difference between what you post and what he posts - when proven wrong, Lando will acknowlege his error. You have never done so, you just keep spewing your shit.

You were commenting on how it was not dark on the west coast until 8 or so at the time of the USC game, it was pointed out to you that sunset was around 6:30. You didn't skip a beat and when right on spewing.

In a thread mentioning the Wisconsin game time, you stated emphatically that Madison, WI was a two hour difference from State College. When did Madison convert to the Mountain Time zone? Again, that was no deterrent to you continuing your verbal vomit.

You need to review your posts for statements that are DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSITE from the truth.
Um, no he won’t…..that’s the problem everybody has with Lando.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AvgUser
If you are this unhappy with the B1G, why don't you get with fellow believers and petition PSU to leave the conference and join another (ACC? MAC? SEC?). Then you would be rid of the hated B1G and even more hated "duhO$U". Maybe the ACC would treat you better.
ACC could not be worse!
 
Um, no he won’t…..that’s the problem everybody has with Lando.

BTW, I never claimed I was right after someone posted I was wrong regarding both of the items cited contrary to what the poster is claiming. Again, did not debate that I was wrong - not one single post in response contending I wasn't wrong. HandjoCommando continually and inexorably contends he is right when he is DIAMETRICALLY WRONG by repeating the same irrelevant inanities over and over and over again ad nauseam... rinse and repeat.
 
BTW, I never claimed I was right after someone posted I was wrong regarding both of the items cited contrary to what the poster is claiming. Again, did not debate that I was wrong - not one single post in response contending I wasn't wrong. HandjoCommando continually and inexorably contends he is right when he is DIAMETRICALLY WRONG by repeating the same irrelevant inanities over and over and over again ad nauseam... rinse and repeat.
Then why not out him on ignore? 🤷🏿‍♂️ what the hell!
 
Then why not out him on ignore? 🤷🏿‍♂️ what the hell!

I have him on ignore - I only see his inanities when others respond to him. There is a difference in talking about how his nonsense with others and talking with him. I talk with others about him because he is a poser-troll who ruins every thread on here for true PSU fans with his nonsense and stupidity - he should be banned.
 
I have him on ignore - I only see his inanities when others respond to him. There is a difference in talking about how his nonsense with others and talking with him. I talk with others about him because he is a poser-troll who ruins every thread on here for true PSU fans with his nonsense and stupidity - he should be banned.
There are about five idiots that repeatedly engage him ad infinitum. This week will start banning anyone that engages him more than three times in a single thread.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT