1) why on Earth did Wisky foul down 3?? with 35+ seconds left?
2) Duke guys hustled more and played with a lot more "edge" Wisky really tightened up.. Wisky starting 5 is more like a starting 3 with 2 add-ins.. they are no where near as talented man for man as Duke, UK, or some of the other elite recruiting teams.. prob behind tOSU and MSU in the BIG.
3) much like their football team Wisky plays like a team who hails from Wisconsin.. a state surrounded by states with heady players and minimal athletes.. I thought the athleticism of Duke was just beyond Wisky.. those Wisky guys had no "twitch" at all, they looked clumsy and bumbling at times
Wisconsin had a great shot, but really puckered up.. Duke kids played loose. I'm not sure Duke would want any kid that plays on Wisky outside of Frank K.. if Frank would have went to the NBA Wisky prob finished 4-5th in the BIG.-sg
2) Duke guys hustled more and played with a lot more "edge" Wisky really tightened up.. Wisky starting 5 is more like a starting 3 with 2 add-ins.. they are no where near as talented man for man as Duke, UK, or some of the other elite recruiting teams.. prob behind tOSU and MSU in the BIG.
3) much like their football team Wisky plays like a team who hails from Wisconsin.. a state surrounded by states with heady players and minimal athletes.. I thought the athleticism of Duke was just beyond Wisky.. those Wisky guys had no "twitch" at all, they looked clumsy and bumbling at times
Wisconsin had a great shot, but really puckered up.. Duke kids played loose. I'm not sure Duke would want any kid that plays on Wisky outside of Frank K.. if Frank would have went to the NBA Wisky prob finished 4-5th in the BIG.-sg
