ADVERTISEMENT

OT: Fogle Now A Suspect.

ralpieE

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2015
879
357
1
CBS news is citing an anonymous source that Fogle is a suspect in child porn.
 
If true, I guess that means the FBI found something on his computers, in his files, etc. Subway cut ties with him yesterday.
 
If true, I guess that means the FBI found something on his computers, in his files, etc. Subway cut ties with him yesterday.



If you saw yesterday, he ran an extensive porn shop out of his dorm room. Either way, he's no doubt finished with SubWay.
 
If you saw yesterday, he ran an extensive porn shop out of his dorm room. Either way, he's no doubt finished with SubWay.

I missed that. Out of his dorm room? So years ago when he was at Indiana? Was it kiddie porn?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ralpieE
I missed that. Out of his dorm room? So years ago when he was at Indiana? Was it kiddie porn?


It really wasn't specified other than "extensive porn". Once you're addicted to that, it's like any other addiction. I think he's a good con man.
 
I missed that. Out of his dorm room? So years ago when he was at Indiana? Was it kiddie porn?

That was a woman I worked with who was 1 year removed from Indiana University before she moved to State College in about 2002. She said his porn collection was legendary. She didn't mention any kid porn, she just said that everyone knew about it. We all knew, so basically we're all at fault here. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: jim cummings
If true, I guess that means the FBI found something on his computers, in his files, etc. Subway cut ties with him yesterday.

And they clearly had probable cause to believe they'd find something in order to get a search warrant. Unless it was purely about the other guy and they had Jared's permission to take the stuff. But if this were just about the other guy, I would've expected this raid months ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fairgambit
I am looking around I am not seeing that he is considered a suspect.

I am seeing that his relationship with Subway is SUSPENDED, not ended.

You know, if we are going to tell stories, can't they at least be semi-accurate?

If your problem is your sources, well....then that is your problem. Please do not make it our problem.
 
I am looking around I am not seeing that he is considered a suspect.

I am seeing that his relationship with Subway is SUSPENDED, not ended.

You know, if we are going to tell stories, can't they at least be semi-accurate?

If your problem is your sources, well....then that is your problem. Please do not make it our problem.

That's what I am seeing too.....plus a kids charity suspended their relationship, which is to be expected. So far, from what I am seeing, his stuff is being vetted with his business associates to see if he was involved. We'll see. I am hesitant to condemn him until things get clarified.

And as to having a porn collection while in college; who didn't have one? My roommate had a collage of playboy and penthouse centerfolds stapled to the entire ceiling of our dorm room.
 
I am looking around I am not seeing that he is considered a suspect.

I am seeing that his relationship with Subway is SUSPENDED, not ended.

You know, if we are going to tell stories, can't they at least be semi-accurate?

If your problem is your sources, well....then that is your problem. Please do not make it our problem.

correct same person who said yesterday he was found guilty of possessing child porn.... he can't even get stories 1/2 correct...
 
I am looking around I am not seeing that he is considered a suspect.

I am seeing that his relationship with Subway is SUSPENDED, not ended.

You know, if we are going to tell stories, can't they at least be semi-accurate?

If your problem is your sources, well....then that is your problem. Please do not make it our problem.


It must be your problem if you're whining about it. I only reported what was said. If it's wrong, that's not my problem.
 
I am looking around I am not seeing that he is considered a suspect.

I am seeing that his relationship with Subway is SUSPENDED, not ended.

You know, if we are going to tell stories, can't they at least be semi-accurate?

If your problem is your sources, well....then that is your problem. Please do not make it our problem.

One cnn.com the headline says "Subway, Jared part ways." Then I read the article and it says their relationship has been suspended, which to me isn't parting ways. The news media can be really annoying sometimes.
 
One cnn.com the headline says "Subway, Jared part ways." Then I read the article and it says their relationship has been suspended, which to me isn't parting ways. The news media can be really annoying sometimes.

Sometimes? Watch Fox then MSNBC then CNN...you'll get a completely different story on the same event. Honestly, TMZ and The National Enquirer are as reliable.
 
Dude, where?

Besides here (your post) which comes up first on Google when you search for more info.

Jeezus. Gotta love the Internet -- anything goes.

It's pnnylion, ApexLion.

Why try to rationalize or question anything he and his 20 screen names says/does?
 
It's pnnylion, ApexLion.

Why try to rationalize or question anything he and his 20 screen names says/does?

He's back already? Making up more unlinkable crap? Why does Tom not do a better job of keeping this dog in the basement?
 
That was a woman I worked with who was 1 year removed from Indiana University before she moved to State College in about 2002. She said his porn collection was legendary. She didn't mention any kid porn, she just said that everyone knew about it. We all knew, so basically we're all at fault here. :rolleyes:

back "in the day", much of porn could qualify as kid porn simply because the girls were legally underage. when most of us define child porn it involves sex with someone very young (under 10) when, in fact, it really comes down to someone under the age of 18. So technically, a child porn collection of kids under 10 is no different than one having kids who are nearly 18 years old.

And the point is that his legendary collection might have actors under 18 but none who were very young. I post this only because a suggestion was made that someone into 'regular porn' isn't likely to devolve into kiddie porn... that is true, but it's quite possible his porn interests were on borderline girls (or boys) hovering near the 18 year old mark. Still "porn" but likely viewed a bit differently.

although "viewed" is the issue...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ralpieE
back "in the day", much of porn could qualify as kid porn simply because the girls were legally underage. when most of us define child porn it involves sex with someone very young (under 10) when, in fact, it really comes down to someone under the age of 18. So technically, a child porn collection of kids under 10 is no different than one having kids who are nearly 18 years old.

And the point is that his legendary collection might have actors under 18 but none who were very young. I post this only because a suggestion was made that someone into 'regular porn' isn't likely to devolve into kiddie porn... that is true, but it's quite possible his porn interests were on borderline girls (or boys) hovering near the 18 year old mark. Still "porn" but likely viewed a bit differently.

although "viewed" is the issue...


There was a link about his "dorm business" that alluded to as much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: N&B4PSU
What is Jareds relationship with Rus. Did Jared Han pick him?

Was Russ arrested for ~~17 y/o porn or much younger? I don't know, I'm asking.
 

I don't get the bit about how it was laziness to eat at Subway because it was right downstairs. If he was too lazy to go far to get stuff to eat then how did he get to big in the first place? And if he was a college student at the time then he had to go out for class. And if he didn't want to spend a lot of time to get food he could've just cooked up frozen pizzas or microwave food, although he'd have had to go to the store now and then to stock up.

Whatever else he's done, losing 245 pounds by eating nothing but Subway for a year or whatever takes some discipline so I give him credit for that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 71camaro
I don't get the bit about how it was laziness to eat at Subway because it was right downstairs. If he was too lazy to go far to get stuff to eat then how did he get to big in the first place? And if he was a college student at the time then he had to go out for class. And if he didn't want to spend a lot of time to get food he could've just cooked up frozen pizzas or microwave food, although he'd have had to go to the store now and then to stock up.

Whatever else he's done, losing 245 pounds by eating nothing but Subway for a year or whatever takes some discipline so I give him credit for that.


He claimed he walked so many miles each day to get his SubWay.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT