Dukie, at this point I have no idea what to believe. If you feel comfortable, I'll turn your two questions to Franco around. What are your specific reasons for disputing these assertions? Just want to get your perspective. Thanks in advance. And like Franco, I respect your posting style.
Any shred of credibility Allan Myers may have had was destroyed after reading this ...
There is no 'statute of limitations' on seeking the truth.
Essentially, he couldn't get it up and has low sex drive. Also, his junk may not look look normal. So any of the accusers saying he had a hard-on or normal looking junk are probably not being truthful.
What could they have documented that isn't clearly spelled out by their notes and emails? Had they documented everything, I'm sure that record would have been used to hang them just the same. In fact, I'm sure the prosecution would have used it to prove their dirty "conspiracy".
I didn't know Curley or Schultz were mandatory reporters. I'm pretty sure Dranov would have been and likely Raykovitz, since he worked for CYS part time.
Well, this was Sandusky's move. And I've done some volunteer work and people would talk about having to teach fatherless boys how to groom. So JS mastered the art of that balance between creepy and illegal. And, we have to understand, that the connection to the Catholic Church scandal didn't happen until after the 2001 JS incident (there were separate claims, but the shocking institutionalization at the church didn't happen until later in 2001 with this pulitzer prize winning series of articles from the Boston Globe paper). My point being that a lot of things changed after 2001, in terms of how these things were handled. Much of the "mandatory reporting" best practices guidelines didn't happen until 2002.
Yep, just think if they had documented what MM said and WHEN....poooof, there is the magical date and time. Again, it's simple HR101 and why reporting incidents like this is actually tracked. Not only would you have the date, you would have what was actually said.....wow....crazy stuff there, but somehow a few here are missing this little concept. There would not be what did MM say, you actually record what was said and have that person sign for it.....crazy stuff apparently for some here.well, knowing what YEAR it happened might have been a good start.
Yep, just think if they had documented what MM said and WHEN....poooof, there is the magical date and time. Again, it's simple HR101 and why reporting incidents like this is actually tracked. Not only would you have the date, you would have what was actually said.....wow....crazy stuff there, but somehow a few here are missing this little concept. There would not be what did MM say, you actually record what was said and have that person sign for it.....crazy stuff apparently for some here.
Again, this was a non issue then and it should be a non issue now. The only reason we know of this incident is because Corbett needed a hook to blame PSU instead of having prying eyes delving into TSM and his relationship with it.
Yes...but the emails weren't "discovered" until well after JS was arrested. So the entire narrative of why and how MM was in the lasch building had to be rebuilt.
The 'failure to report' charges were dropped. They plead guilty to one count each of endangering the welfare of a child who was never in danger.
IIRC, teachers are mandatory reporters but that suggests k ~ 12. Why would a college teacher, people that are dealing with students that are legally adults, be mandatory reporters? Is a professor a "teacher?" IDK.
They didn't plead guilty because they were mandatory reporters. They took the plea because of the bullshit spread by the OAG which tainted the jury pool. Either you are stupid or you are playing coy. Either way, you are full of shit.
Jerry was inappropriate and creeped out the boy. Mom was concerned. Had there been no physical contact, I'm sure there would have been no investigation.
