I've heard IT called a lot if different terms but ping-pong was not one of them.
One thing we have in common was a lot of my dates ended with me punting.
Paniro named in ISU gambling probe
- Thread starter wrestlingfan22
- Start date
One thing we have in common was a lot of my dates ended with me punting.
Why does your wife want you to get surgery for new boobs?Only surgery I've had is a meniscus scope for my knee. Vasectomy is next followed by Carpal tunnel on my wrists and new boobs for the wife..
If he gets Ironbird and Grip surgically removed, is that a double mastectomy?
If he transplants each of their brains into his head, he'll almost have a full brain. Almost.
so basically he gets no punishment and a bonus extra yr! NCAA is a joke!
Well, if the evidence was illegally obtained, the NCAA shouldn't be doling out punishment.
The two are unrelated.
Paniro's situation is a bit different than the Iowa guys.
ALL of his bets were prior to him enrolling as an NCAA athlete. It's why he's getting the slap on the wrist.
The two are unrelated, but I'm not disappointed that the NCAA is going a little lighter on these guys. They did what they did and can't really complain about it, but they were also victims of a LE vendetta in Iowa when this issue is clearly not unique to that state.
If you read the above posts, Paniro's situation was different. For the Iowa guys, the DA overstepped and got caught. Hence the Iowa guys are getting eligibility back. The NCAA would've never had the evidence without the DA. This is similar to the "fruit of the poison tree doctrine". You can see from post #412 why Paniro is getting reinstated.
So they got caught because an official had a vendetta is what you saying and this absolves them from breaking ncaa rules?
The NCAA got the information legally as the schools self reported the illegally obtained information. The illegal information basically can't be used in criminal proceedings anymore. They are totally separate jurisdictions end of the day obviously. The NCAA modified rules to try to make it a lot more leinient than before also. It used to be any type of gambling = a season suspension and on your own school = permanent ban.
Big question now is the potential civil lawsuit. The athletes rights were infringed on end of the day (warrantless search) and they suffered damages as a result of that. Assigning blame in court will be interesting and I will definitely be following. On one hand, the athletes still were the ones knowingly breaking the rules they are trained up on .... on the other hand, they really shouldn't have been caught.
That's the weird part. If he wasn't an NCAA athlete, how can he be accountable to follow their rules. Until you agree to be bound (either explicitly or implicitly by becoming an athlete) and haven't received any compliance training, then how would you be bound?
Last edited:
well he still got a free yr of training!plus an xtra yr to wrestle!iowa guys so you mean both iowa and IOWA STATE?
I don't really care he is a kid from Erie,Pa so I want him to do well!
Similar threads
