He would be near the top.I like your thinking but with this thinking where do you put Dake on GOAT list, isnt he the only 4x who didnt RS?
Yes for now AB is closing in.
Pat Smith won a few titles before a RS.
He would be near the top.I like your thinking but with this thinking where do you put Dake on GOAT list, isnt he the only 4x who didnt RS?
Goalpost moving. The video clearly said World/Olympic credentials not included.He won World and Olympic Titles while still in college. That should absolutely count.
Thats what gets me… Snyder was not even close to as dominant as our fab four 3xers, or DT, yet if Snyder would have beaten Gadsen people would have him in GOAT conversation. Should ONE MATCH really turn the tides in such a way?Goalpost moving. The video clearly said World/Olympic credentials not included.
Regardless, he still list to Coon as a SR.
Also had a significantly lower bonus rate than Zain, Jason, or Bo.
But he was a bad call away from being a 4X.Wisconsin - Any of the PSU 3xers ahead of Lee Kemp. He was never dominant.
Quality finals win… Bo over Dean or Cenzo over Imar?If we take into account wrestling IQ I put Nolf at the top. An uninjured Nolf in his prime beats anyone he's that good and by far the smartest wrestler I ever saw take the mat at PSU. Now Taylor is a close second and both he and Bo lost their freshman finals match and then dominated from there. However, Bo did wrestle a 2x champion in Dean to win a final which has to count for something because Dean was a beast. Having said all this I'm going with Nico who won a title after losing countless times to everyone in the room
Goalpost moving. The video clearly said World/Olympic credentials not included.
Regardless, he still list to Coon as a SR.
Also had a significantly lower bonus rate than Zain, Jason, or Bo.
But he was a bad call away from being a 4X.
Thats what gets me… Snyder was not even close to as dominant as our fab four 3xers, or DT, yet if Snyder would have beaten Gadsen people would have him in GOAT conversation. Should ONE MATCH really turn the tides in such a way?
Anywhere. Including small PA schools. It isn't like PSU was the assumed school for any elite recruit.Where else would he have gone?
Thanks for proving my point.Snyder was pretty darn dominant. Bonus rate:
FR - 50%
SO - 72%
JR - 76%
SR - 66%
At the very top there is going to be only one, maybe two matches that tilt the scales.Thats what gets me… Snyder was not even close to as dominant as our fab four 3xers, or DT, yet if Snyder would have beaten Gadsen people would have him in GOAT conversation. Should ONE MATCH really turn the tides in such a way?
Kemp had a higher pin % then Pat Smith.Fair point. But domination does count
So trueAt the very top there is going to be only one, maybe two matches that tilt the scales.
If Jason Nolf beat IMAR, if Bo pulls his arm and scores 6 instead of giving 6, if DT beats Bubba their perceived greatness jumps higher.
I recall someone, I think on Flo, predicting Snyder would pin Johnson and my reaction being Snyder had a total of zero career wins by fall in college at the time. (And he didn’t pin Johnson either.)Goalpost moving. The video clearly said World/Olympic credentials not included.
Regardless, he still list to Coon as a SR.
Also had a significantly lower bonus rate than Zain, Jason, or Bo.
My top 4 wearing PSU singlet:
Bo - 3x NCAA Champ, 4x finalist, 3x Big10 Champ at 174, 184, 197
Ed - 3x NCAA Champ, 4x Big10 Champ
Zain - 3x NCAA Champ all at 149, 3x Big10 Champ
Jason - 3x NCAA Champ all at 157, 2x Big10 Champ
Bo and Ed won NCAA's and Big10's at different weights.
Bo wins over guys with NCAA's championship in the finals, (2x Dean, Myles, Moore). Pins Myles to secure win Team Title. To me Bo is clearly the best wrestler to wear a PSU singlet. I view Championship’s at Multiple weight classes as my most important category, NCAA’s and Big10’s.
Genuinely curious as to why you put the most value in the multiple weight class thing?My top 4 wearing PSU singlet:
Bo - 3x NCAA Champ, 4x finalist, 3x Big10 Champ at 174, 184, 197
Ed - 3x NCAA Champ, 4x Big10 Champ
Zain - 3x NCAA Champ all at 149, 3x Big10 Champ
Jason - 3x NCAA Champ all at 157, 2x Big10 Champ
Bo and Ed won NCAA's and Big10's at different weights.
Bo wins over guys with NCAA's championship in the finals, (2x Dean, Myles, Moore). Pins Myles to secure win Team Title. To me Bo is clearly the best wrestler to wear a PSU singlet. I view Championship’s at Multiple weight classes as my most important category, NCAA’s and Big10’s.
My reasoning is……Genuinely curious as to why you put the most value in the multiple weight class thing?
I understand Bo at 197 as it was always a strong belief that he never came close to 197, but never personally put much value on that aspect in general.
What’s your angle?
In theory his solar callus grew stronger every year, which some speculate could have been a competitive advantage.My reasoning is……
Take Kyle Dake moving up every year in weight class. In reality he should be competing against guys that are cutting weight and should be considerably stronger than him each time he moves up in weight. I’m not a fan of his but for me he is the second best wrestler of all time behind Cael the GOAT.
To each his own,but by your criteria why wouldnt you have Dake # 1?My reasoning is……
Take Kyle Dake moving up every year in weight class. In reality he should be competing against guys that are cutting weight and should be considerably stronger than him each time he moves up in weight. I’m not a fan of his but for me he is the second best wrestler of all time behind Cael the GOAT.
I am always amazed that everyone puts Taylor over Ruth without much discussion. Ed Ruth was as good as anyone that ever wore a blue singlet with a white belt.
When looking at past wrestlers we can only compare titles and stats if we weren’t there to witness ourselves.. a 4xer is always viewed as better then 3xer. And 3xer better then 2xer.. etc.. Ruth is a 3xer compared to DT being 2xer but for those watching them both actively wrestle at the time it always felt like DT 1a and Ruth 1b.. hence DT got the hodge.. but yeah if looking at just base titles Ruth is tops.Agree, when looking at college results only, I have Ed Ruth at the top of my PSU list. His RS Sophomore year at 174 was an incredibly dominant season, shame he never won the hodge.
Taylor had the whole Magic Man mystique versus the "Easy Ed" moniker. You had the smoothness of Ruth versus the whirling dervish that was Taylor. In the eye test it always looked like Taylor was doing more when the fact is they both dominated. They both lost 3 college matches, Taylor had 7 more pins (less than 2 per year). Where Taylor really surpassed Ruth was in TF's. It ended as 1 and 2 in bonus point wins (125-104) or 5 per year. So I would agree that the comparison is razor thin but 3 is always greater than 2.When looking at past wrestlers we can only compare titles and stats if we weren’t there to witness ourselves.. a 4xer is always viewed as better then 3xer. And 3xer better then 2xer.. etc.. Ruth is a 3xer compared to DT being 2xer but for those watching them both actively wrestle at the time it always felt like DT 1a and Ruth 1b.. hence DT got the hodge.. but yeah if looking at just base titles Ruth is tops.
But,but,but DT make 4 finals too EzEd’s 3Taylor had the whole Magic Man mystique versus the "Easy Ed" moniker. You had the smoothness of Ruth versus the whirling dervish that was Taylor. In the eye test it always looked like Taylor was doing more when the fact is they both dominated. They both lost 3 college matches, Taylor had 7 more pins (less than 2 per year). Where Taylor really surpassed Ruth was in TF's. It ended as 1 and 2 in bonus point wins (125-104) or 5 per year. So I would agree that the comparison is razor thin but 3 is always greater than 2.
I don’t think every 3xer is automatically better then a 2xer..best example of this is Gable Stevenson.. maybe a wrestler had a injury year or retired early..etc.Taylor had the whole Magic Man mystique versus the "Easy Ed" moniker. You had the smoothness of Ruth versus the whirling dervish that was Taylor. In the eye test it always looked like Taylor was doing more when the fact is they both dominated. They both lost 3 college matches, Taylor had 7 more pins (less than 2 per year). Where Taylor really surpassed Ruth was in TF's. It ended as 1 and 2 in bonus point wins (125-104) or 5 per year. So I would agree that the comparison is razor thin but 3 is always greater than 2.
And how bout the few 3xers who didnt even have an oppurtunity to try as a freshman. This is more futile than DeSanto trying to get RBY’s arm.I don’t think every 3xer is automatically better then a 2xer..best example of this is Gable Stevenson.. maybe a wrestler had a injury year or retired early..etc.
Yes Ruth has more based titles vs DT but DT wins in almost every other category(finals, hodge,bonus rate, tourney pts scored). And for people witnessing them both wrestle at the time it was pretty unanimous DT was 1a and Ruth was 1b..(hence many feel Ruth deserves more credit and rightfully so). there should also be more weight to winning a hodge too as this is much harder to win then a ncaa Title..
We are that good lolNo Kerry McCoy? A Hodge winner, 2x champ and 2x Olympian misses your list? For shame.
I won't argue with this. Well done.My top 4 wearing PSU singlet:
Bo - 3x NCAA Champ, 4x finalist, 3x Big10 Champ at 174, 184, 197
Ed - 3x NCAA Champ, 4x Big10 Champ
Zain - 3x NCAA Champ all at 149, 3x Big10 Champ
Jason - 3x NCAA Champ all at 157, 2x Big10 Champ
Bo and Ed won NCAA's and Big10's at different weights.
Bo wins over guys with NCAA's championship in the finals, (2x Dean, Myles, Moore). Pins Myles to secure win Team Title. To me Bo is clearly the best wrestler to wear a PSU singlet. I view Championship’s at Multiple weight classes as my most important category, NCAA’s and Big10’s.
Is 3 always greater then 2 though?? There has been a handful of 3x hwt ncaa champ. Would you say they are all better then 2x hwt champ Gable Stevenson?? Will wrestling fans 50 years from now know how great Gable was or will they just compare 2 titles to 3/4..Taylor had the whole Magic Man mystique versus the "Easy Ed" moniker. You had the smoothness of Ruth versus the whirling dervish that was Taylor. In the eye test it always looked like Taylor was doing more when the fact is they both dominated. They both lost 3 college matches, Taylor had 7 more pins (less than 2 per year). Where Taylor really surpassed Ruth was in TF's. It ended as 1 and 2 in bonus point wins (125-104) or 5 per year. So I would agree that the comparison is razor thin but 3 is always greater than 2.
Is Gable Steveson a good example to keep pointing to? Is there any other person whose career/circumstance is comparable? I don’t see how he applies to a DT vs. Ruth debate. We all know the variables that play into how DT and Ruth were/are perceived, and none of them have anything to do with Steveson.Is 3 always greater then 2 though?? There has been a handful of 3x hwt ncaa champ. Would you say they are all better then 2x hwt champ Gable Stevenson?? Will wrestling fans 50 years from now know how great Gable was or will they just compare 2 titles to 3/4..
To each his own,but by your criteria why wouldnt you have Dake # 1?
One person's world Cael Sanderson.imagine a world where 1-2-2-Covid isn't in your programs Top 10.
Cael's victory total 159-0 to Dake's record of 137-4To each his own,but by your criteria why wouldnt you have Dake # 1?
Take Gabe Dean for instance that wrestled all 4 years at 184lbs - one strong guy that finished 3rd, 1st, 1st, and reached the finals again in 2017 to face Bo Nickal hoping to become a 3x Champ.Genuinely curious as to why you put the most value in the multiple weight class thing?
I understand Bo at 197 as it was always a strong belief that he never came close to 197, but never personally put much value on that aspect in general.
What’s your angle?