ADVERTISEMENT

PSU D vs McCarthy

I think he's historically been a fire zone type of guy primarily. He's playing a lot of man with his blitzing this year because he trusts 4-5 corners and 4 safetys, but they still mix things up some.

Teams are only completing 48% +/- of their passes vs this defense and that is with average LB coverage and giving the middle quite a bit.

Teams are also throwing quick. 1.8-2.4 seconds quick.

Bad teams allowed JJ to complete 78% of passes.

Bad teams only completed 48% vs Penn State.
 
nobody has said he has no weaknesses, rather, he hasn't made the mistakes you would expect from a young first year qb...when you pressure the qb, yeah, a qb that can run is a threat if your rush doesn't get home...is that being a homer.?pretty much just stating the obvious..
Just because he can run doesn't mean he won't get sacked or make an errant throw. Not every QB scramble is a positive if the rush does not get home. Again, he has not faced a lot of pressure where those mistakes can happen. Let's see how he handles Sat.
 
O’Connell is an accurate QB. By far the best one we have seen until tomorrow. He's 66% on the season after we held him to 49%.

McCarthy's numbers are not that much better than Cliff's. They've both played in 5 games - McCarthy is averaging 230 Passing YPG. Cliff is averaging 206 Passing YPG. Cliff has 9 TD Passes vs 2 INTs. McCarthy has 9 TD Passes vs 1 INT. They're both averaging 12 YPC. Completion % obviously favors McCarthy (78.3% vs 62.0%). The thing with Cliff, it's usually a question of which Cliff you get - against Auburn and Ohio he had a very high Competition % - against Purdue and NW around 50%. I don't think you can read all that much into his last game (the NW game) - the weather conditions were very unique. Honestly, Cliff is "a gamer" - I think he plays well tomorrow.
 
McCarthy's numbers are not that much better than Cliff's. They've both played in 5 games - McCarthy is averaging 230 Passing YPG. Cliff is averaging 206 Passing YPG. Cliff has 9 TD Passes vs 2 INTs. McCarthy has 9 TD Passes vs 1 INT. They're both averaging 12 YPC. Completion % obviously favors McCarthy (78.3% vs 62.0%). The thing with Cliff, it's usually a question of which Cliff you get - against Auburn and Ohio he had a very high Competition % - against Purdue and NW around 50%. I don't think you can read all that much into his last game (the NW game) - the weather conditions were very unique. Honestly, Cliff is "a gamer" - I think he plays well tomorrow.
He has played well against scUM.
 
McCarthy is averaging 9.6 yards per attempt. Clifford is averaging only 7.5 per attempt.

McCarthy's rating is 182.1. Clifford's rating is 144.0.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluehair666
McCarthy is averaging 9.6 yards per attempt. Clifford is averaging only 7.5 per attempt.

McCarthy's rating is 182.1. Clifford's rating is 144.0.

The average per completion tells you more (and both avg about 12 YPC). The higher Completion% (which I already listed) is telling you the exact same thing as the higher yards per attempt (i.e., dividing yards by more attempts = lower yards per attempt).
 
Actually yes he is. And Actually...Clifford tends to play well in bigger games.

McCarthy on the other hand, has not.

McCarthy played pretty damned well vs the Buckeyes.

NCAA-OHIO-STATE-MICHIGAN.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluehair666
Just because he can run doesn't mean he won't get sacked or make an errant throw. Not every QB scramble is a positive if the rush does not get home. Again, he has not faced a lot of pressure where those mistakes can happen. Let's see how he handles Sat.
ok, no need to get huffy, lol....honestly, i think manny diaz is a younger version of don brown, blitz all game..and it works really well when you have the better players, not so much when you don't..so yeah, we'll see..
 
ok, no need to get huffy, lol....honestly, i think manny diaz is a younger version of don brown, blitz all game..and it works really well when you have the better players, not so much when you don't..so yeah, we'll see..
You're confident in a scUM win. I like that.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bluehair666
??? Listen people on here tolerate a lot of your Bullshit and you just throwing stuff around with no real proof. When you say, most Big 10 fans will say Kinnick is the hardest place to play, truly shows your an idiot. First off , how would any fan, know that one stadium is tougher to plat at then another? Is it their dealings with opposing fans?? Is it what they perceive as being intimidating??? I mean truly how the players react to a visiting teams stadium is all that helps to dictate any type of bearing on a game. As a matter of fact, there was a recent poll of 68 former players , Power 5 and Non-Power 5, and guess what, Iowa was not on the list. Penn State was 1, LSU #2, Oregon # 3, and tied at #4 were Ohio State, Michigan and Texas.

So who gives a shit what people say. Michigan won in Iowa.... Big Deal..... Its been a proven fact, that most people who follow football.... DONT KNOW SHIT ABOUT IT!!! They watch it, but have no concepts of coverages, schemes, etc... If you are the type of fan that thinks JJ is a proven warrior cause he won in Kinnick, you my friend are one of the most, I mentioned above. Oh and please post your poll of fans from all over the Big 10 that ranked Kinnick as the hardest place to play. I have been to Iowa, Ohio State, Michigan, Wisconsin and as someone who played college ball, I would rather play in Kinnick then those places, not even close!

Think his comment was based on the fact that until the Michigan game this year, 5 if the last 6 Top 5 teams in the rankings that visited Iowa came out with a loss. You may not agree with his wording, but you wanted facts.
 
Last edited:
You only beat lowly Iowa by the same number of scores.

13 > 10, not to mention Iowa scored its last TD in garbage time with :08 left in the game. Margin of victory comparisons,in general, can be very deceiving. Applies to PSU's 10 pt win over NW too.

But 2 scores makes you technically correct.
 
Last edited:
He also went on the road against Iowa and played very well. Most Big 10 fans will tell you, Iowa is the hardest place to play in the Big Ten.
Mostly when it is at least an afternoon game or later and they are at least good (8-5 or better). This year’s Iowa has a good defense and bad offense. Average at best right now.
 
Beating a bad team by 50 is more impressive than beating a bad team by 19. IMO, all three of Michigan's cupcake games were more impressive than your win over cupcake Ohio.

When Bama annually pastes some FCS team by 50 in November, they don't get docked for playing a bad team.
I mean, this is what I was saying--if they're pretending Penn State has impressive wins then so does Michigan
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluehair666
I think of it this way: The odds on psu playing poorly 3 straight games are less than the odds on psu playing well after 2 poor games AND a bye week.
I think you can throw out the nw game due to conditions and cmu has a pretty good team and that game followed a big win over the sec.
My guess is 31/20 good guys fingers crossed.Young qb will not see where the blitz will be coming from and I think Cliff will have his best game of the season by far.
Steve Dace the mulch man says mulch all the way but he was fearful of the betting line.
 
Last edited:
You're confident in a scUM win. I like that.
we're fans, we're both confident until proven otherwise...i think psu has 2 great freshman rb's, but the key will be how the psu offensive line plays..to paraphrase denny green, we'll see if your o-line is who i think they are, lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ivan brunetti
13 > 10, not to mention Iowa scored its last TD in garbage time with :08 left in the game. Margin of victory comparisons,in general, can be very deceiving. Applies to PSU's 10 pt win over NW too.

But 2 scores makes you technically correct.
Technically correct is still correct.
 
True but correct does not always equate relevant and/or accurate. Whatever makes you happy.
It is both relevant and accurate. The reason you talk about # of scores instead of number of points is that is the most relevant to "how close a game was". Have a seat.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT