B1G refs are darn close to making me hate football. A close game should be exciting, but there's not much to root for. I do have yard work to do and I don't think the leaves could possibly p*ss me off any more.
B1G refs are darn close to making me hate football. A close game should be exciting, but there's not much to root for. I do have yard work to do and I don't think the leaves could possibly p*ss me off any more.
Refs not killings us, Illinois running game is.B1G refs are darn close to making me hate football. A close game should be exciting, but there's not much to root for. I do have yard work to do and I don't think the leaves could possibly p*ss me off any more.
Refs not killings us, Illinois running game is.
It was. And it was confirmed.The refs stole 7, possibly 10+ (assuming a FG after the missed late hit on Clifford) from PSU today.
Also, why was the winning 2 pt conversion not reviewed? It looked to me like it might have hit the ground, although I didn't see a great camera angle.
Bad officiating took away a good TD from Illinois allowing the game to go to OT.The refs stole 7, possibly 10+ (assuming a FG after the missed late hit on Clifford) from PSU today.
Also, why was the winning 2 pt conversion not reviewed? It looked to me like it might have hit the ground, although I didn't see a great camera angle.
Bad officiating took away a good TD from Illinois allowing the game to go to OT.
Wrong. Go watch the Pitt game and stop posting on our board.Bad officiating took away a good TD from Illinois allowing the game to go to OT.
It was not announced that it was reviewed. Not that I saw.It was. And it was confirmed.
You're a jackass toolbag.Bad officiating took away a good TD from Illinois allowing the game to go to OT.
Right around the time the coaches were shaking hands, you could hear the PA announcer make a statement saying the ruling of a catch had been confirmed.It was not announced that it was reviewed. Not that I saw.
The ball was caught behind the line, not past. As always, if I am wrong once I see a really good video, I'll acknowledge it. The replay I saw was behind the line.Explain. Ball was received past the line of scrimmage making both the lineman downfield and the WR blocking penalties which would not have been had he received it behind the line of scrimmage. You are wrong.
That’s another bitch, while we’re at it. That PA Announcer sounds like a carnival barker.Right around the time the coaches were shaking hands, you could hear the PA announcer make a statement saying the ruling of a catch had been confirmed.
Aren’t all scoring plays automatically reviewed?It was not announced that it was reviewed. Not that I saw.
You sir are totally dishonest or need glasses. Simply, it was not!!!!The ball was caught behind the line, not past. As always, if I am wrong once I see a really good video, I'll acknowledge it. The replay I saw was behind the line.
You're wrong.The ball was caught behind the line, not past. As always, if I am wrong once I see a really good video, I'll acknowledge it. The replay I saw was behind the line.
Excuses pal. Try bitching about the D not stopping the run game.I'm not sure if I have ever seen more holding and blocking in the back, not called in a game.
You're a nut job then....I saw it was clearly not.The ball was caught behind the line, not past. As always, if I am wrong once I see a really good video, I'll acknowledge it. The replay I saw was behind the line.
I just watched a really good shot (though the angle was far from ideal) of it was clearly right on the line. Could have been past, could have short. Nothing I saw on the replay indicates the ball was caught downfield.You sir are totally dishonest or need glasses. Simply, it was not!!!!
You and me both. He has to be fired and you can't afford to wait until the end of the season.Franklin has made me not care about PSU CFB.
All plays are reviewed…scoring plays is an NFL specific ruleAren’t all scoring plays automatically reviewed?
This is way down at the bottom of bad play calling and bad officiating and had no effect on the outcome, but didn't Illinois get an extra time out in OT? They called one to ice PSU's kicker on a field-goal attempt (that was in OT, right?) and then called another one to set the defense on a 2-point conversion. No one complained about it, so maybe I'm wrong. You get just one time out in overtime, right?
Not even close dude. The OL was at least 3 yards down the field on the first one and it was an obvious holding call on the second (one they finally called). Refs didn’t cause PSU to lose although as Orlovsky said you can’t not call the late hit on Clifford and then call a BS pass interference in Porter on the ensuing possession. Apparently the refs don’t understand that you can bump a receiver before the ball is thrown. In retrospect another missed FG by Stout was a killer.Bad officiating took away a good TD from Illinois allowing the game to go to OT.
If the receiver was behind the line, and all evidence says he was, though not conclusively, both penalties were legal plays.Not even close dude. The OL was at least 3 yards down the field on the first one and it was an obvious holding call on the second (one they finally called). Refs didn’t cause PSU to lose although as Orlovsky said you can’t not call the late hit on Clifford and then call a BS pass interference in Porter on the ensuing possession. Apparently the refs don’t understand that you can bump a receiver before the ball is thrown. In retrospect another missed FG by Stout was a killer.
This announcement wouldn't come from the PA announcer; it would come from the refs. There was no such announcement.Right around the time the coaches were shaking hands, you could hear the PA announcer make a statement saying the ruling of a catch had been confirmed.
Zero evidence shows he was behind the line scrimmage. Both fouls were correct.If the receiver was behind the line, and all evidence says he was, though not conclusively, both penalties were legal plays.
You are a Pitt fan and liar.I just watched a really good shot (though the angle was far from ideal) of it was clearly right on the line. Could have been past, could have short. Nothing I saw on the replay indicates the ball was caught downfield.
I thought I never see a program like ours complaining about a team like Illinois.Yes they are. If the refs actually called holding and blocking in the back, the Illinois running game would be far less effective.
Why have rules if the refs don't enforce them.
What do you mean....complaining?I thought I never see a program like ours complaining about a team like Illinois.
If Stout makes the field goal....we win.I will say this, one missed call absolutely did hurt PSU: the missed late hit on Clifford. PSU still had the momentum, was driving after a fumble recovery, and looking to go up 17-7 and ice the game. Pass on 3rd and 7 was incomplete, was holding on PSU, but no late hit on Clifford.
I suppose if they would have called it, it would have just replayed the 3rd and 7 anyway, and it’s no sure thing PSU would have converted. As it was, it wasn’t called and Stout missed a FG.
Illinois missed a FG too.If Stout makes the field goal....we win.