Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
can anyone confirm this? Would be huge no?
Someone willing to interpret this?
That's one of the things which makes this situation so bizarre. If the NCAA ratchets up its bullying efforts against PSU and the Paterno team it means they'd be bullying a co-defendant (PSU). Yet PSU still bends over backward to kiss the ass of the NCAA. It's just weird.looks like it is true....Scott says now that they have won the appeal the NCAA is going to intensify its effort to bully PSU and the paterno team. He also said this will give them access to the Freeh Docs.
That's one of the things which makes this situation so bizarre. If the NCAA ratchets up its bullying efforts against PSU and the Paterno team it means they'd be bullying a co-defendant (PSU). Yet PSU still bends over backward to kiss the ass of the NCAA. It's just weird.
It's a reference to the court ruling that denies the appeal. Basically, the bad guys have to share the Freeh Docs with the Paternos. Oops. Kinda sucks for the boys like Emmert.tom can you explain exactly what this means?
The actual court rulings are not online, from what I can tell. However, my understanding is that the Freeh docs must be turned over. At least the ones Wick and company decide are relevant to their needs (probably using keyword strings).Does this basically mean that attorney/client privilege does not apply to the Freeh Docs? I didn't read the legal jargon but just wanted short answer - does this give the Paterno team unfettered access to the Freeh engagement letter, interviews, etc.
Double like: one for the post and one for the girl in the postI know it's still way too early in the game, but this could be the biggest win for PSU football this year. Or ever.
I don't think anyone outside of Freeh has seen these files. IIRC PSU settled with the victims before they had to turn the files over to them, and thus that was the emergency meeting of the BOT. I think I have this right.Wonder if Cruise 66 will show up today. This should also be great news for alumni BOT and Spanier suit against Freeh. Will PSU now drop opposition to alumni BOT? Considering others have been granted access to these files (Sandusky victims), it shouldn't too much of a surprise, but will hopefully reveal what is behind the curtail. Good news for some seeking the truth.
looks like it is true....Scott says now that they have won the appeal the NCAA is going to intensify its effort to bully PSU and the paterno team. He also said this will give them access to the Freeh Docs.
Not sure to whom they would appeal. At some point, the higher courts are going to make the case move forward because you can't just continue to arbitrarily appeal. The fact remains that if Freeh did careful unbiased work, it should stand up to scrutiny.Can't the NCAA appeal again?
I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think the NCAA can appeal since Freeh was hired by co-defendant PSU. The Freeh work was on behalf of PSU and the fact there may have been collaboration between Freeh and the NCAA wouldn't matter. Obviously the Freeh documents would likely show the depth of the collaboration but as far as we know the documents are strictly between PSU and Freeh.Can't the NCAA appeal again?
I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think the NCAA can appeal since Freeh was hired by co-defendant PSU. The Freeh work was on behalf of PSU and the fact there may have been collaboration between Freeh and the NCAA wouldn't matter. Obviously the Freeh documents would likely show the depth of the collaboration but as far as we know the documents are strictly between PSU and Freeh.
As I wrote, I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong.
Not sure to whom they would appeal. At some point, the higher courts are going to make the case move forward because you can't just continue to arbitrarily appeal. The fact remains that if Freeh did careful unbiased work, it should stand up to scrutiny.
can anyone confirm this? Would be huge no?