All good and fair points. But, if Franco is correct that the Snedden report says Schultz was told by McQueary that Sandusky was wrestling around with a boy in the shower then a report to police should have been made. There really isn’t a question about that, is there? Don’t the results of having not done that show this to be true?
I think there is a question about it.
It doesn't seem like at the time, anybody thought the incident was criminal.
I believe the question that Curley and Schultz had was whether this incident was criminal and whether Penn State had any present or future liability. Schultz states in the report that Curely, Spanier and himself thought the incident was inappropriate but not criminal. I believe Curley and Schultz thought Penn State's present liability was minimal, but seemed more concerned about future liability. In hindsight, Curely and Schultz should have more concerned about future liability. They should have done a better job of documenting the incident and should have been able to demonstrate that they filed a report with DPW and CYS if they did in fact file those reports which I believe they did.
Please read Snedden's report. I have provided the link on numerous occasions. I get the sense that Schultz remembers that it was horsing around or wrestling or something along that line. The facts are that :
1. Curely, Schultz, and Spanier thought it was inappropriate but NOT criminal.
2. John McQueary and Dr. Dranov both do not recall a report of a sexual assault in 2000/2001 and they would have remembered it if it had been reported that way.
3. AM/v2 gave a statement that he had been snapping towels and horsing around with Sandusky and there had been nothing untoward then or at any time.
There is no real evidence that the v2 incident was sexual in any way. The only evidence we have is the evidence manufactured by the OAG:
1. False grand jury presented that Mike McQueary witnessed an anal rape
2. Mike McQueary did not say a sexual assault had occurred in 2000/2001, but 10 years later when the OAG having evidence of college football gambling and cell phone photos hanging over his head said it was definately sexual
3. Jonelle Eschbach's email to Mike McQueary concerning her twisting Mike's words and that Mike would not be able to correct the record
4. OAG's trumped up charges againt Curley and Schultz so that they wouldn't be able to testify for Sandusky's defense at trial.
This manufactured evidence is all prosecutorial misconduct and is proof of the political corruption that took place.