FWIW - I don't think its a huge hairy deal.......but the idea that it WOULD BE a "huge hairy deal" for PSU to "get back" the money that was stolen from it is silly (even if you create false premises to make it seem so ).
Just to illustrate, and then I am going to exit.....lest any circle-jerk ensue (what's the odds on THAT happening? ):
_______________
If the B1G brought in $36 Million per year of "divisible" bowl money in each year that they held back the PSU share (so lets say PSU had $3,000,000 stolen from them per year for two years, and each other member school received $3,000,000 per year......I don't know the exact figures, and it doesn't matter to illustrate the point):
Lets say next year the B1G brings in $42,000,000 of "divisible" bowl money (I'll assume that all 14 members are now entitled to "full shares"....though I do not know that for a fact....but, again, it doesn't matter wrt the illustration).
Before doling out the booty of $42,000,000....the B1G should portion out the $6,000,000 of stolen revenue they owe to PSU - and forward that to PSU (making them "whole" for the years in which funds were stolen from them) - and then allocate out the remaining $36,000,000 equally to the 14 member schools.
This would make the situation "whole".....PSU, and every other member of the conference, would now have their equal allocation of the Bowl revenue pot. (assuming PSU wouldn't insist on also receiving interest on the stolen money )
And the fact that the B1G decided to steal money from PSU - and give it to "charities" (I believe it is your contention that the B1G did give this money to "charities", and I won't argue the point with you) becomes a cost burden that would be shared equally by all member schools (including PSU)....and all member schools would now be "equally treated" with respect to the allocation of all Bowl revenues.
It ain't even hard.
It's as simple as falling off a log......unless one DOESN'T WANT TO understand it.
Yeah, that'll go over real well. We get paid back our money and every other school takes a hit to pay for it. We'll be real popular.
If Rec Hall is such a home court advantage, why didn't it work pre-BJC? Or for that matter post BJC since we lost to Princeton in our Return to Rec game?
How many ECBL championships did we win playing there? Ans: zero
How many Eastern Eight championships did we win playing there? Ans: zero
How many Atlantic 10 championships did we win playing there? Ans: zero
We played in those conferences from 1976 until we joined the Big Ten (minus a couple of years as an independent), We never once won a conference regular season championship in all those years.
Playing in Rec Hall would create a lot more problems than it would solve.
So if Penn State had a roster of 10 year old girls and lost a game at Rec Hall by 80 points, you would come to the conclusion that Rec Hall doesn't provide a home court advantage?
The home court doesn't matter if you don't have the roster. All those seasons you mentioned, I'm going to guess Penn State wasn't anyone's preseason favorite.
That's correct - and we'd be in the exact same boat in the Big Ten. We're not going to be anyone's preseason favorite and playing in Rec Hall isn't suddenly going to make us contenders.
"....lest any circle-jerk ensue (what's the odds on THAT happening? "Except in your example every other school just got a reduced payout to pay us back. They will not be happy. It's not like you're reducing the amount they're getting by an amount they previously received and shouldn't have... that money went to charity.
Using your example, $42M divided by 14 schools is $3M each. If we take $6M off the top to pay back PSU, that leaves $36M to distribute, as you said. Which divided by 14 schools is $2.57M each. So all schools would take an over $400K hit from their distribution to pay us back. Not. Going. To. Happen.
Now, if the conference were to open up their coffers and pay us back without cutting revenue distributions, fine. That's a route to pursue. But asking other schools to take a big cut so we can get all of our money... Uh huh. You've in essence penalized all of them to make us whole. Won't happen.
Now, if anyone (besides the corporate offices) should pay us, it's the freakin Spartans and their loud mouth President. She was very vocal when Sandusky happened, and now we find they've been sitting on their own similar issues the entire time. Won't happen, but at the least she should be issuing us an apology. Often it's those that yell the loudest that have the most to hide.
When did it become "stylish" to require that thieves "want to" give you your money back? Before you demand the return of what was stolen from you?What you don't seem to understand is that before you can just hand Penn State $13M, you are going to have to get the other 13 school presidents to each agree lose over a million dollars worth of their monies. Why would they ever agree to that? Out of the kindness of their hearts? I don't think so.
Words........Fail.
If Rec Hall is such a home court advantage, why didn't it work pre-BJC? Or for that matter post BJC since we lost to Princeton in our Return to Rec game?
How many ECBL championships did we win playing there? Ans: zero
How many Eastern Eight championships did we win playing there? Ans: zero
How many Atlantic 10 championships did we win playing there? Ans: zero
We played in those conferences from 1976 until we joined the Big Ten (minus a couple of years as an independent), We never once won a conference regular season championship in all those years.
Playing in Rec Hall would create a lot more problems than it would solve.
Do you actually think playing in Rec Hall is going to win more games? Did you miss the Princeton game where Penn State squandered a 20 point lead in the second half in 2013 to lose a game in Rec Hall. I am sure the 4,509 and the 4,803 really helped Penn State beat power houses Louisiana Monroe and Canisius.It's opportunity cost.
Rec Hall would give Penn State a legitimate home court advantage. That means more wins. More wins means more success and more interest. More interest means more revenue.
If playing in Rec Hall with the current roster resulted in 3 consecutive NCAA Tournament appearances, the interest in this program explodes and we cement our legitimacy with recruits. You now have a sustainable product that has great interest.
The long term financial impact of legitimizing the basketball program would dwarf any short term losses sustained by leaving the BJC.
The current version of Rec Hall is not a long term play. We would be leveraging it in the short term simply to legitimize the program. Once that happens, you'll find the funding needed to either renovate one of our current facilities or build something new.
The only comparison that takes all unrelated variables is to look at the difference between home and away winning percentage in Rec Hall vs BJC. I don't have access to this data, unfortunately.
That's correct - and we'd be in the exact same boat in the Big Ten. We're not going to be anyone's preseason favorite and playing in Rec Hall isn't suddenly going to make us contenders. We need better Jimmies and Joes and playing in Rec Hall isn't something recruits would be enthralled about.
LOLThe only comparison that takes all unrelated variables is to look at the difference between home and away winning percentage in Rec Hall vs BJC. I don't have access to this data, unfortunately.
When did it become "stylish" to require that thieves "want to" give you your money back? Before you demand the return of what was stolen from you?
Or, have you forgotten that the B1G acts only based upon the direction and approval of the University Presidents?
Good God.......It takes an idiot whisperer
I knew you couldn't keep your promise to stay away. You took the bait."....lest any circle-jerk ensue (what's the odds on THAT happening? "
If, and I say IF, the schools received our share of the bowl money and KEPT it, I would agree with you. But they were given it with the caveat that it had to go to charity. I'm assuming they did as instructed. Therefore, they in essence never received "extra" money that went into their budget. Therefore, paying us back requires they dig into their share of the money they were entitled to, not any "extra" monies that they didn't deserve.When did it become "stylish" to require that thieves "want to" give you your money back? Before you demand the return of what was stolen from you?
Or, have you forgotten that the B1G acts only based upon the direction and approval of the University Presidents?
Good God.......It takes an idiot whisperer
Thankfully, i never had any students as pathologically stupid as you......otherwise the efforts would have been mootIf, and I say IF, the schools received our share of the bowl money and KEPT it, I would agree with you. But they were given it with the caveat that it had to go to charity. I'm assuming they did as instructed. Therefore, they in essence never received "extra" money that went into their budget. Therefore, paying us back requires they dig into their share of the money they were entitled to, not any "extra" monies that they didn't deserve.
Good God... and you're teaching finance?
If, and I say IF, the schools received our share of the bowl money and KEPT it, I would agree with you. But they were given it with the caveat that it had to go to charity. I'm assuming they did as instructed. Therefore, they in essence never received "extra" money that went into their budget. Therefore, paying us back requires they dig into their share of the money they were entitled to, not any "extra" monies that they didn't deserve.
Good God... and you're teaching finance?
I suspect it's not your students who are pathological.Thankfully, i never had any students as pathologically stupid as you......otherwise the efforts would have been moot
Either way, the finance professor doesn't seem to get it.The schools never saw any of the money. They designated the charities that were to receive the funds and the Big Ten sent the checks.
So taking to recruits to see a 1/2 filled Rec Hall is more attractive. A place which doesn't even have a locker room facility for basketball teams? You completely neglect the fact the last two games in rec hall weren't close to being filled.I think you are wrong... it may not work for the long haul, but a electric, filled to capacity rec hall would be a lot more attractive than a 1/3rd filled BJC. This would only work if you held a carrot out to recruits saying that Penn State would be building a better basketball venue.
Are you going to write a check or the several millions to renovate and expand the facility to add locker rooms and other support facilities for the basketball team? Using the other sports locker room, transporting the court, and hoops is fine for a one off game but it won't work for playing a half schedule.How about using the approach that Villanova uses. I don't know the exact formula they use to decide the venue, but it seems that for most non-conference games and mid-week conference games that will not draw a ton of people, they use the on campus Pavillion. For the bigger drawing games, they move downtown and use the bigger Wells Fargo Center. St. John's does something similar with their on campus arena and MSG. Why couldn't Penn State use a similiar approach with Rec Hall and the BJC?
Do you actually think playing in Rec Hall is going to win more games? Did you miss the Princeton game where Penn State squandered a 20 point lead in the second half in 2013 to lose a game in Rec Hall. I am sure the 4,509 and the 4,803 really helped Penn State beat power houses Louisiana Monroe and Canisius.
If Rec Hall was such a help then Penn State would have had more than 1 NCAA tournament appearance from 1966 until 1996 when they left the place.
If Vegas put out a point spread for Penn State/Minnesota this weekend at the BJC and Penn State/Minnesota at Rec Hall, Penn State would be s bigger favorite in Rec Hall. 10000% guaranteed.
Those players that are closing the talent gap wouldn't be at Penn State if basketball was still in Rec Hall.That is such a bad argument.
Playing in Rec Hall doesn't guarantee a 100% winning percentage and no blown leads, but Rec Hall is a louder and more intimidating environment than the BJC.
If Vegas put out a point spread for Penn State/Minnesota this weekend at the BJC and Penn State/Minnesota at Rec Hall, Penn State would be s bigger favorite in Rec Hall. 10000% guaranteed.
If you don't think playing in Rec Hall is worth any points to Penn State you might as well argue there is no such thing as a home court advantage.
Playing in Rec Hall is about playing the percentages not guaranteeing wins.
What previous teams accomplished at Rec Hall isn't relevant. Relative to the completion, Penn State is closing the talent gap more than it ever has.
The talent gap is closing more than it ever has at Penn State.
How much more intimidating is a half full rec hall compared to a 1/3 full Jordan Center? How electric will it be if Penn State is drawing 4k in the building? People make the false assumption that it going to sell out every game and be packed. The last two games played there has about 2,000 empty seats.That is such a bad argument.
Playing in Rec Hall doesn't guarantee a 100% winning percentage and no blown leads, but Rec Hall is a louder and more intimidating environment than the BJC.
If Vegas put out a point spread for Penn State/Minnesota this weekend at the BJC and Penn State/Minnesota at Rec Hall, Penn State would be s bigger favorite in Rec Hall. 10000% guaranteed.
If you don't think playing in Rec Hall is worth any points to Penn State you might as well argue there is no such thing as a home court advantage.
Playing in Rec Hall is about playing the percentages not guaranteeing wins.
What previous teams accomplished at Rec Hall isn't relevant. Relative to the completion, Penn State is closing the talent gap more than it ever has.
The talent gap is closing more than it ever has at Penn State.
Those were not attractive games against good teams. Also, its a supply and demand problem. If I can't get tickets to see MSU, then maybe I get tickets to see a lesser opponent. Right now, anyone can buy tickets for whatever game they want, or season tickets for that matter. There should always be more demand than there is supply...So taking to recruits to see a 1/2 filled Rec Hall is more attractive. A place which doesn't even have a locker room facility for basketball teams? You completely neglect the fact the last two games in rec hall weren't close to being filled.
How much more intimidating is a half full rec hall compared to a 1/3 full Jordan Center? How electric will it be if Penn State is drawing 4k in the building? People make the false assumption that it going to sell out every game and be packed. The last two games played there has about 2,000 empty seats.
How much more intimidating is a half full rec hall compared to a 1/3 full Jordan Center? How electric will it be if Penn State is drawing 4k in the building? People make the false assumption that it going to sell out every game and be packed. The last two games played there has about 2,000 empty seats.
There will never be a home court advantage playing in the poorly designed BJC. Watching the game at the Palestra yesterday really made me think regardless of what the BJC costs to maintain the basketball teams (Lady Lions included) should move back to Rec Hall permanently.
your moniker explains your postPlay the non conference games in Rec Hall, and switch to BJC for the Big 10 schedule. Hopefully some of the enthusiasm from the OOC games will carry over into increased attendance at BJC.
Playing Conference games in Rec Hall is - I believe - a non-starteryour moniker explains your post
There were virtually no expectations for last year's team and those games were played against obscure midmajor teams.
You move the team to Rec Hall for the home court advantage you enjoy against Big Ten teams, not Louisiana Monroe.
With where the program is today, Penn State would sell out the rest of the Big Ten schedule in Rec Hall.