Should the Patriots forfeit their super bowl win?
- Thread starter 12375CAT
- Start date
I suspect some of the answers would be different if the opponent had been the vaunted Black and Yellow.
I do think that they should have been without Brady an their HC and QB for the Superbowl. They were caught cheating and both lied. You can't undo the NFL's inaction. But if they have cheating scandal and controversy continuously popping up from the same team and same HC and nothing is done, then their fans will eventually believe that the game is fixed.
If only there existed a protocol where, after each play, the game ball is given to an on-field official. As such, the official would be able to handle the ball and would be able to detect any meaningful deviation from what would otherwise be a common game ball. Oh well
If you are implying that part of the standard protocol is for an official to check the football after each play for any deviations in air pressure, you are most certainly wrong. Besides there were no meaningful deviations in the Patriots footballs, they were almost ALL underinflated.
Last edited:
Of course not. The investigation didn't turn up any proof that the Patriots did anything wrong. How do you punish the Patriots because you think they "might" have violated the rules?
Should refs call holding penalties they didn't see just because they think it's more likely than not that somebody was held?
"Best part of you ran down the crack of your Momma's ass and ended up a brown stain on the mattress." I guy I worked with, fell asleep watching HBO. When he woke up, Hartman was going nuts on the recruits. He said he swore he was back in Parris Island.
Very convenient how the NFL waited until after the draft to issue their report. It will be forgotten by next years draft
Similar threads
