Good D, especially after a push off.Christian Campbell with some nice D. Small sample size, but they are posting lots of highlights of passing/defending vertical routes. Teams will load the box on Barkley, gotta keep making them pay.
Good D, especially after a push off.Christian Campbell with some nice D. Small sample size, but they are posting lots of highlights of passing/defending vertical routes. Teams will load the box on Barkley, gotta keep making them pay.
This kid should excite everyone. I really think RS FR breakout season will happen
Good to see about Jenkins. He is listed at 6'8" 337#. Yikes, but he is just one of 10 O-Lineman listed at 300 pounds plus.
This team certainly passes the "looks" test. Big and athletic.
It's continually stunning to me how different this program is from where it was in Joe's last years. The depth of talent is unprecedented, the coaching represents best practices. No more assistant coaching slots getting filled with former players with no coaching experience (or any qualifications at all other than a PSU letter). No more tired old assistants hanging on till they get a pension. No more Derek Foxes and Anthony Scirrottos being asked to do things that they are not athletically equipped to do. No more people getting starting jobs by seniority or by default.
I don't have any illusions about how hard it will be for PSU to reach its lofty goals for this season -- so many other great programs are in the way. When you get back to the top 10-15, the differences are very slight and games can turn on small, sometimes random things. Even for a great team (ask Alabama) it takes quite a bit of luck to win every game. College football is incredibly competitive.
In so many ways this season is going to be more difficult than last year for these players because of the expectations.
It's going to be a good year but let's try to enjoy it and not expect anything to come easily. PSU is not going to win any games because they're better, because they're entitled. They're going to win because they go out and beat people. I keep going back to what Franklin said when he was hired. He said he might not be the best coach out there, but he will not be outworked by anybody. And that attitude just pervades the program. I hope he can keep this team hungry like they were last year.
It's continually stunning to me how different this program is from where it was in Joe's last years. The depth of talent is unprecedented, the coaching represents best practices. No more assistant coaching slots getting filled with former players with no coaching experience (or any qualifications at all other than a PSU letter). No more tired old assistants hanging on till they get a pension. No more Derek Foxes and Anthony Scirrottos being asked to do things that they are not athletically equipped to do. No more people getting starting jobs by seniority or by default.
You are aware that one can present valid criticisms about the way the program was operated in the latter Paterno years, right? Especially considering the way the program operates now, recognition of the clear deficiencies in those coaching staffs and the way that staff handled player personnel decisions is not the same as "trashing JVP and the men who worked for him". It's not personal against them, it's just reality, and nothing that the poster said was incorrect or unfair.I love what James Franklin is doing. It's 2017 and it will be great to look forward to every Saturday being a competitive game AND wining many more than we lose. But, I can do that without trashing JVP and the men who worked for him.
Its a matter of opinion. Last October I started a thread defending JF, after the Michigan loss. Few, had any good things to say about him. Now, he and his staff are sainted. What a difference 9 wins and less than one season has made. Sorry, I appreciate everything about Joe. He was more than a coach. I've moved on and really appreciate James Franklin as well. Different men, different eras, different game. I can admire the genius of both. Glad both made their homes at PSU.You are aware that one can present valid criticisms about the way the program was operated in the latter Paterno years, right? Especially considering the way the program operates now, recognition of the clear deficiencies in those coaching staffs and the way that staff handled player personnel decisions is not the same as "trashing JVP and the men who worked for him". It's not personal against them, it's just reality, and nothing that the poster said was incorrect or unfair.
I was never part of the "Joe must go" crowd (remember them?) I felt that Joe had MORE than earned the right to go out on his own terms- but the last few years were not his finest, and the staff WAS lacking. It's fair to say that and still hold Joe in the highest respect.Its a matter of opinion. Last October I started a thread defending JF, after the Michigan loss. Few, had any good things to say about him. Now, he and his staff are sainted. What a difference 9 wins and less than one season has made. Sorry, I appreciate everything about Joe. He was more than a coach. I've moved on and really appreciate James Franklin as well. Different men, different eras, different game. I can admire the genius of both. Glad both made their homes at PSU.
the problem with going down that road is you get in pissing battles that don't need to happen. Lots of what the previous poster said was incorrect. One of JVP last hires was neither a former player, or someone with no qualifications except a letter. It was someone who worked their way up through the ranks, just like many of JVP other hires. Many of the other statements are clearly just opinions, and not facts (No more Derek Foxes and Anthony Scirrottos being asked to do things that they are not athletically equipped to do. No more people getting starting jobs by seniority or by default.) That's an opinion, not a fact.You are aware that one can present valid criticisms about the way the program was operated in the latter Paterno years, right? Especially considering the way the program operates now, recognition of the clear deficiencies in those coaching staffs and the way that staff handled player personnel decisions is not the same as "trashing JVP and the men who worked for him". It's not personal against them, it's just reality, and nothing that the poster said was incorrect or unfair.
The worst was Paterno's strength program under John Thomas. I'm not an expert on the topic, but if I recall it was no free weights, nautilus machines and "resistance training". Remember hearing about guys who would sneak off to use free weights during the summer. Terrible.
see this is an opinion that not everyone shares. As you mentioned you are not an expert, but I would consider John Thomas one. I think he ran the program the way he thought it best. So lets' move on.The worst was Paterno's strength program under John Thomas. I'm not an expert on the topic, but if I recall it was no free weights, nautilus machines and "resistance training". Remember hearing about guys who would sneak off to use free weights during the summer. Terrible.
see this is an opinion that not everyone shares. As you mentioned you are not an expert, but I would consider John Thomas one. I think he ran the program the way he thought it best. So lets' move on.
I love what James Franklin is doing. It's 2017 and it will be great to look forward to every Saturday being a competitive game AND wining many more than we lose. But, I can do that without trashing JVP and the men who worked for him.
see this is an opinion that not everyone shares. As you mentioned you are not an expert, but I would consider John Thomas one. I think he ran the program the way he thought it best. So lets' move on.
Over Joes last 3 full seasons we won 29 games, James 25; 2 of JVPs last 3 seasons had better records than James best season (at over 80 years of age). Perhaps we should be thankful for the job James is doing and be thankful for the years we had under Joe.You are aware that one can present valid criticisms about the way the program was operated in the latter Paterno years, right? Especially considering the way the program operates now, recognition of the clear deficiencies in those coaching staffs and the way that staff handled player personnel decisions is not the same as "trashing JVP and the men who worked for him". It's not personal against them, it's just reality, and nothing that the poster said was incorrect or unfair.
I'll admit it is a funny statement, but it is just somebody's opinion. We don't need to bring all of this stuff up any more, in my opinion. Last year should excite everyone, and hope it can continue. so how they did it before is irrelevant, other than to say it must have worked pretty well as PSU won a lot games over the years!I have no position on John Thomas, but I do remember when O'Brien came in, some unnamed person on the PSU staff took a look at the equipment in the weight room and said it belonged at a Curves. Don't know if that's fair, but it was pretty funny.
PSU was 11-2 2 of Joes last 3 full seasons - that is not 9-3It's just reality. I loved Joe, I supported his right to work into his 80s, as long as he wanted, even though the program had settled into a perennial 9-3, 8-4, Outback Bowl-in-a-good-year kind of program.
With the benefit of hindsight, I wouldn't support his right to work into his 80s. With the benefit of hindsight, I think Joe was doing a disservice to those players he recruited by not being able to give them state of the art training and coaching. He always said he would get out of the way if someone else could do it better -- but he didn't. He worked hard at trying to lower fans' expectations, and I think he meant well, it was partly so that his successor wouldn't have such a hard time. But in the end I think it was the wrong message for his players. The program was smug and self-satisfied; it was all about glories past.
Joe has been a hero of mine since I was 9 years old, and he will always be. But let's be truthful when we talk about the program in Joe's last years. It was a lot of mediocrity and complacency wrapped around two coaches -- LJ Sr. and Vandy -- who were the only reason PSU was still competitive. They had some good years.
As for the assistants, they were awesome people (except for one). And most were competent. But when you have 10-15 HS all-Americans at a position and you're not consistently producing Big Ten caliber players, and when your unit isn't B1G competitive 2 years out of four -- I'm sorry, it's time to retire and let someone else have a go. When year after year you lose skill players to Rutgers and Maryland and Pitt and Virginia because they don't have confidence in your offensive system ....
But really my post wasn't about how bad things were. They weren't bad. 9-3 and the Outback Bowl isn't BAD. It's just amazing how much BETTER things are now.
Judge had a pretty good thread going talking about the here and now, I rather stay on that than debate the S&C program of 6 yrs ago.The Thomas program would be a bigger problem today, than it was back then.
PSU was 11-2 2 of Joes last 3 full seasons - that is not 9-3
Over Joes last 3 full seasons we won 29 games, James 25; 2 of JVPs last 3 seasons had better records than James best season (at over 80 years of age). Perhaps we should be thankful for the job James is doing and be thankful for the years we had under Joe.
I remember the endless arguments of the HIT program vs free weights on this board ...The Thomas program would be a bigger problem today, than it was back then.
The Thomas program would be a bigger problem today, than it was back then.
Hell yeah! It's coming together people!They are raving about Juwan Johnson. Had offers from Bama, OSU, Michigan, etc coming out, he's putting it all together now.
Cothran was starting to become dominant by the end of the season. If he stays healthy, he should have a big year and make his way into the draft.
Cothran was starting to become dominant by the end of the season. If he stays healthy, he should have a big year and make his way into the draft.
Nobody, me included, expected Wright to do much last season. Maybe Jenkins can have a similar impact if called upon this season. He certainly is a formidable obstacle.Sterling Jenkins, #76 in this clip, is just enormous. He's 2nd string RT so far, maybe the light is going on.
I know photo angles can be funny but 62 is listed at 6'4, while 71 is listed at 6'6, yet in the picture 62 looks taller.