It's unlikely the NCAA would adopt a 'loser pays' (called the "English Rule" in litigation) because it's typically reserved for special circumstances here in the US and would be challenged in court as exceeding the NCAA's authority. I've long maintained it would be beneficial in more circumstances to discourage certain types of 'lawfare' gamesmanship, but it's just not going to happen.Who pays the legal fees if no violation is determined?
Irrespective of who pays legal fees, if anyone is going to get the NCAA to sit up and notice tampering violations in wrestling, it's Cael.