Look son, you're guilty of a logical fallacy. You're assuming only athletic directors who have hired/fired a coach are qualified to assess whether a coach needs more than 4 years to prove themselves. Silliness. You forget about data, which is accessible to you too if you look for it...Did you know that, outside of Rutgers and PSU, every current head basketball coach in the big ten has taken their team to the tournament. Rutgers gets a pass because the current coach has been there one year. Did you know that the current head coaches collectively have 113 years of experience in the big ten and 72 ncaa tournament appearances? Did you know that the worst ncaa appearance ratio for current big ten coaches (outside of Psu and Rutgers) was one appearance in five years? (That was Illinois). Did you know that the top half of current big ten coaches go to the tournament every 1.25yrs and the bottom half good one every 3.25yrs?
In every dimension, chambers has underperformed against his peers in the big ten. I don't know what crap you do for living, but I'm truly thankful that your biasness and decision-making are far away from me. You seem to be very comfortable with shifty performance.
