Problem for Stanford is that nobody cares about Stanford football, including Stanford. Stanford has acknowledged that they are demphasizing sports. The same problem exists for Rice and TCU. Like Stanford in a big TV market, problem is nobody watches them.
Clearly if some combination of eyeballs on a televised game is the major criteria, with filled seats in a stadium to a lesser degree, ND is the clear leader of a school to be added, while a BC probably wouldn’t make the cut.
But it would follow that if the super conference business model is to maximize revenue through tv ads and ticket sales aren’t there schools at risk for being subtracted from the conference? Any pencil pusher can do the math that there are bottom line gains to be made not just through addition but by subtraction as well. If accountants are truly running the show, underperforming school may not be allowed to drain the coffers of any super conference (no tv following or sold out stadiums) while significant upgrades to the bottom line are simply a phone call away. Here’s the BIG football attendance records pre and post pandemic (last 2 relevant years)
BIG School | 2019 | 2021
Michigan | 111,459 | 107,712
Penn State | 105,678 | 106,756
Ohio State | 103,383 | 92,869
Nebraska | 89,348 | 86,586
Wisconsin | 76,472 | 70,556
Michigan State | 67,819 | 70,170
Iowa | 65,557 | 66,201
Purdue | 54,021 | 52,536
Indiana | 41,244 | 50,037
Minnesota | 46,190 | 46,804
Rutgers | 30,082 | 46,193
Maryland | 37,812 | 37,767
Illinois | 36,587 | 36,573
Northwestern | 37,736 | 29,186