Over on Rivals' Cal Board (which is a subscription board), the posters are talking about how the Pac has sucked this bowl season, how the B1G has pwned this bowl season, and about how the B1G got left out of the playoff. One Board member submitted a post that included the following two paragraphs:
"Jim Delaney [sic] is arguably the most powerful man in sports, so it seems he isn't going to take his conference being left out of the playoff after an 8-0 (or even 7-1) bowl record lightly, and will be a driving force to push for playoff expansion.
He knows being left out hurts the prestige of his conference, and ultimately that translates to dollars he doesn't want his schools to miss out on. Unlike [Pac-12 Commissioner] Larry Scott, he will doggedly fight to make his conference #1 in the country and won't rest until it is, and even then, he'll try extending his lead."
I responded by noting that Delany is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, and far from universally loved in the B1G. Another poster then asked "Why is Delany not smart?"
My impulse was to simply note that he had: (1) taken a very hostile attitude towards PSU in the wake of the Sandusky fiasco, even after many of the NCAA sanctions had been walked back; and (2) made some incredibly unfortunate statements indicating a marked favoritism towards tOSU and UM, but I thought there must be more to it.
Help me out here. Why do you consider Delany to be a less than stellar B1G Commissioner? Or if you believe he IS pretty good, please tell me why as well. I want to be able to provide a fuller response to this question on the Cal Board.
"Jim Delaney [sic] is arguably the most powerful man in sports, so it seems he isn't going to take his conference being left out of the playoff after an 8-0 (or even 7-1) bowl record lightly, and will be a driving force to push for playoff expansion.
He knows being left out hurts the prestige of his conference, and ultimately that translates to dollars he doesn't want his schools to miss out on. Unlike [Pac-12 Commissioner] Larry Scott, he will doggedly fight to make his conference #1 in the country and won't rest until it is, and even then, he'll try extending his lead."
I responded by noting that Delany is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, and far from universally loved in the B1G. Another poster then asked "Why is Delany not smart?"
My impulse was to simply note that he had: (1) taken a very hostile attitude towards PSU in the wake of the Sandusky fiasco, even after many of the NCAA sanctions had been walked back; and (2) made some incredibly unfortunate statements indicating a marked favoritism towards tOSU and UM, but I thought there must be more to it.
Help me out here. Why do you consider Delany to be a less than stellar B1G Commissioner? Or if you believe he IS pretty good, please tell me why as well. I want to be able to provide a fuller response to this question on the Cal Board.
Last edited: