Cradles for daysWell timed, Chickenman.
Just imagine themtrottingrolling Gabe Arnold out against AB at Carver.
Cradles for daysWell timed, Chickenman.
Just imagine themtrottingrolling Gabe Arnold out against AB at Carver.
It’ll be hard to compete with Sebolt’s ties to Iowa
Don’t give Bob Nicolls any ideas.Not wrestling but interesting NIL suit brought by an athlete against a that will almost certainly succeed, revealing a pretty dark and predatory tactic that others have likely tried.
In 2020 University of Florida Football player Gervon Dexter signed an NIL deal with "Big League Adavance Fund II, LP" which paid him $436k to sign autographs, make appearances, etc., and in exchange Big League Advance Fund would receive 15% of Dexter's pre-tax NFL earnings for 25 years. [!]
Dexter got drafted this past year by the Bears and BLAF wants its money, so Dexter sued for a declaratory judgment, pointing to the Florida NIL statute, which essentially caps NIL contracts to the athlete's collegiate years.
I cannot imagine a scenario where a court enforces this contract, but I thought it interesting to flag because it's such a gross overreach (but probably somewhat common), and is perhaps indicative of just how seedy things have gotten. The Florida statute appears unambiguous but states are all over the place with their NIL statutes, and I can imagine such an arragement might be enforceable in another state.
Obviously this tactic has no particular application to wrestling.
Lawsuit here:
To give context as to how bad this NIL "contract" is: Dexter signed with the Bears for 4 years and nearly $3.7M guaranteed. BLAF's 15% of that is $554k -- $120k more than they paid him in NIL.Not wrestling but interesting NIL suit brought by an athlete against a that will almost certainly succeed, revealing a pretty dark and predatory tactic that others have likely tried.
In 2020 University of Florida Football player Gervon Dexter signed an NIL deal with "Big League Adavance Fund II, LP" which paid him $436k to sign autographs, make appearances, etc., and in exchange Big League Advance Fund would receive 15% of Dexter's pre-tax NFL earnings for 25 years. [!]
Dexter got drafted this past year by the Bears and BLAF wants its money, so Dexter sued for a declaratory judgment, pointing to the Florida NIL statute, which essentially caps NIL contracts to the athlete's collegiate years.
I cannot imagine a scenario where a court enforces this contract, but I thought it interesting to flag because it's such a gross overreach (but probably somewhat common), and is perhaps indicative of just how seedy things have gotten. The Florida statute appears unambiguous but states are all over the place with their NIL statutes, and I can imagine such an arragement might be enforceable in another state.
Obviously this tactic has no particular application to wrestling.
Lawsuit here:
What do you find most seedy?it's such a gross overreach (but probably somewhat common), and is perhaps indicative of just how seedy things have gotten.
It could go deep into Dexter's coaching career, if he is coach material and goes that direction.25yrs is more than any NFL career, so I guess they're including deferred salary and pension too.
What do you find most seedy?
Why do you believe the contract won't be enforced?
I don't see the nexus between FL NIL law only covering college years and the terms of some contract going beyond those years. Perhaps those terms are simply not part of the NIL, as they have nothing to do with payment for autographs, etc.
The duration of a contract for representation of an intercollegiate athlete or compensation for the use of an intercollegiate athlete’s name, image, or likeness may not extend beyond her or his participation in an athletic program at a postsecondary educational institution.
The duration of a contract for representation of student-athlete or compensation for the use of Name, Image and Likeness may not extend beyond participation in athletic program at institution.
25yrs is more than any NFL career, so I guess they're including deferred salary and pension too.
It's looks to me like a payday loan on steroids. The company is named "Big League Advance Funds" afterall, which makes their intent pretty clear. They probably already have made similar contracts post graduation before NIL, which have been enforced.
Sure it smacks of taking advantage of and a partial return to indentured servitude.
But I recall universities, including PSU, floating the idea of taking a % of career earnings for some period in lieu of tuition for certain majors. It was proposed as a means to make university accessible to those who couldn't afford it. Although intent may differ, I would see this practice similar to Dexter's case. I don't know what would be illegal or unenforceable about it, either.
(4) An agent contract that does not conform to this section is voidable by the student athlete. If a student athlete voids an agent contract, the student athlete is not required to pay any consideration or return any consideration received from the athlete agent to induce the student athlete to enter into the contract.
When they're drafting an NIL deal the size of Dexter's they have a reasonably good idea of how high he's going to get drafted, that much I'm certain of. Yes, there's risk, but it's well-researched and managed risk. Maybe they're even taking out insurance policies to hedge the bets--I would.Tikk10. I thought the same thing regarding reverse mortgages. On the company's side they take all of the risk. What if it was journey Brown or Tengwall that signed this. Would we still be calling them predators? If it was a reverse mortgage and for some reason the home value skyrocketed would we feel bad for the old owner?
Btw. They do the same things with minor league baseball players. I watched a feature news story about this same thing on 60 minutes or hbo Bryant gamble show. I don't recall which. Some of these kids make it and are paying back a lot of money, but a lot never make at all.
Let's just say whoever told this young man it was ok to take this deal did not have his best interests at heart. That deal is just dumb as shit all the way aroundWhat do you find most seedy?
Why do you believe the contract won't be enforced?
I don't see the nexus between FL NIL law only covering college years and the terms of some contract going beyond those years. Perhaps those terms are simply not part of the NIL, as they have nothing to do with payment for autographs, etc.
25yrs is more than any NFL career, so I guess they're including deferred salary and pension too.
It's looks to me like a payday loan on steroids. The company is named "Big League Advance Funds" afterall, which makes their intent pretty clear. They probably already have made similar contracts post graduation before NIL, which have been enforced.
Sure it smacks of taking advantage of and a partial return to indentured servitude.
But I recall universities, including PSU, floating the idea of taking a % of career earnings for some period in lieu of tuition for certain majors. It was proposed as a means to make university accessible to those who couldn't afford it. Although intent may differ, I would see this practice similar to Dexter's case. I don't know what would be illegal or unenforceable about it, either.
Not sure why you think the FL law is contrary to the SCOTUS decision because it definitely isn't. SCOTUS was merely telling the NCAA it could no longer prevent student athletes from receiving education-related benefits.@tikk10 - Could the defendants argue to the Supreme Court that Florida law is contrary to their prior decision that created NIL?
I understood that decision to say no provision allowed that prevents a student athlete from earning based on NIL. It's seems similar to the Court's present stance on the 2nd Amendment.
Couldn't the defendants argue the Florida Law is contrary, and proffer that they would not have offered the contract otherwise?
Was the Supreme Court's decision limited to the NCAA?
What even is the basis of the Florida law? What general public good is assured by this law?
And I still wonder whether the law's statements of consideration might make clear that its wording only intended to apply to the student athlete for the period that they are a student athlete, or Defendants will argue this.
I'll leave the legalese to Tikk, but note here that many laws are about protecting specific groups rather than the "general public good." This is such an instance (as college athletes are a very limited subset of the population), and rightly so given the volume of scumbags associated with athletics.What even is the basis of the Florida law? What general public good is assured by this law?
After seeing him at Final X in Newark, I was struck with how keeping 184 must have been a challenge for him. I think he will have a dominant season at 197. I'd love to see him dismantle an Italian sports car.
He probably won't get a chance.After seeing him at Final X in Newark, I was struck with how keeping 184 must have been a challenge for him. I think he will have a dominant season at 197. I'd love to see him dismantle an Italian sports car.
Mexico is going to turn some heads this year.
I’m excited to see him wrestle. He’s always been very good in freestyle and his style is super exciting to watch
Austin or Roman?I’m excited to see him wrestle. He’s always been very good in freestyle and his style is super exciting to watch
I was talking Austin but I can wait to see RBY back on the mat as wellAustin or Roman?
I’ve always appreciated that Kurt has never seemed to be too far from his wrestling roots