With the boom of Nike investing in wrestling (or collegiate athletics in general) are we (or I) wrong or unfair to ask for Nike to pay wrestling reparations before we hop on-board?
I read plenty of information regarding Oregon and the loss of their program. Perhaps I read all subjective texts, but it feels like Phil Knight found a way out and got wrestling cut in lieu of baseball (a revenue wasteland). For that to happen at Nike U, but everyone to get on the Nike train in wrestling seems like we're feeding a hand that slapped us.
I get that colleges have little choice. I was surprised by Iowa going the Nike singlet route. They're signing RTC's. USA did their deal with them.
Am I being unfair or entitled by feeling slighted for the sport? Should we demand more? Is Nike investing into the sport enough to pay back for Oregon's loss?
Board thoughts?
I read plenty of information regarding Oregon and the loss of their program. Perhaps I read all subjective texts, but it feels like Phil Knight found a way out and got wrestling cut in lieu of baseball (a revenue wasteland). For that to happen at Nike U, but everyone to get on the Nike train in wrestling seems like we're feeding a hand that slapped us.
I get that colleges have little choice. I was surprised by Iowa going the Nike singlet route. They're signing RTC's. USA did their deal with them.
Am I being unfair or entitled by feeling slighted for the sport? Should we demand more? Is Nike investing into the sport enough to pay back for Oregon's loss?
Board thoughts?