In the history of college football, no 4-0 team has been worse.
Wisconsin crapping the bed.
- Thread starter EPC FAN
- Start date
Well we have NAFTA so we should be the worst 4-0 team in Mexico too!
Well we have NAFTA so we should be the worst 4-0 team in Mexico too!
No question. Mexican futbol clubs would kick our ass.
It’s amazing what happens when they actually call holding on Wisconsin’s OL. I think I saw them get called for a few holds and a face mask. I still don’t think the first Notre Dame TD was a catch.
And their OL / run game are always wildly over-rated as proven when they play "quality opposition. We held them to 3.0 yards per rushing attempt. ND held them to 2.8 yards per rushing attempt today - those averages are just awful.....putrid. BTW, Wiscinsin outgained ND today 318 yards to ND's 242 yards. ND had a grand total of 3 yards rushing! (3 yards on 32 Rushing Attempts!). Can we stop the bullshit about how Wisconsin is going to win games with their possession Offense and incredible OL.... and teams that can't run the ball can't win!!! The reason Wisconsin lost is that ND scored TDs on successful Offensive Drives and Wisconsin TOs off short-fields in Wiscosin territory, while Wisconsin kicked a FG off of NDs TO in ND Territory... as well as a FG off their only successful 1st half offensive drive. As per usual, Wisconsin played too much of the game from behind due to their over-rated suckazz plodding offense and OL. But for God sakes, can we stop the bullshit about teams that can't run the ball can't win and teams that do run the ball almost always win, because it is no longer true in football and is utter tripe.
There’s a good argument that teams that can run and pass have the most effective offenses.
Wisconsin doesn’t threaten anybody downfield with their passing. They don’t have a two minute offense, it’s more like eight minutes.
Doesn’t really matter. The math is all about a 1 or 0 in the loss column. Everything else is bs for talking heads to quibble over.
Yep...and Auburn losing at the half to Georgia State. Our wins now not looking that impressive. Both Wisky and Auburn will fall out of the top 25
I thought on the BTN scores being shown, it was 24-13 with around 2 min to go, and Wisky had the ball. How do you get 17 pts in that amount of time??
But let me guess, Iowa struggling against Colorado State and their impressive win over Iowa State (who is getting beaten by Baylor 28-16) indicates how deserving Iowa is of a top 5 ranking.... LMAO!
Hmmmm....so let me understand this. Since Iowa is not deserving of a #5 ranking makes us deserving of a #6 ranking? Just want to make sure I know how it works.
31 points off of turnovers. 7 points due to kickoff return. Yeah, no big surprise Wisconsin lost.
No, let me get it straight, so PSU has as good of wins as anyone around them, and better than most. But somehow, according to you, none of them deserve to be ranked????? So since none of top 10 ranked teams, except the top 4, deserve to be ranked, just who is it that does deserve to be ranked boy-genius. What a f'ing Maroon as the legendary Bugs Bunny would put it.
Why so hostile my friend? No need to resort to name calling. We are all Penn Staters here. Iowa may not be deserving of a #5 ranking. But based on the scores, #6 seems a little generous for us.
Are you asking who is ranked ahead of Penn State? Right now they are Bama, Georgia, Oregon, Oklahoma and Iowa.
No, you are saying 6 is generous for PSU. So who are the six (or more) teams you’d rank higher?
In addition to the 5 I mentioned, Arkansas and Notre Dame are looking better. So that's 7 teams. At this stage, a #8 ranking seems more realistic for Penn State.
Really? You're the a-hole who tried to claim it makes no difference if Iowa is over-rated, including having less impressive wins (Iowa's hugely impressive wins were against an Indiana team that is currently 1-2 and an Iowa State team who just lost to unranked Baylor and who now stands at 2-2). Do explain how this has nothing to do with PSU's ranking when they're ranked higher than PSU boy-genius (you should be able to easily explain such an asinine statement given that you're the one who made it boy-genius). And no, I don't agree with your COMPLETELY UNSUPPORTED gratuitous comment that PSU's ranking is "generous". Please do list all these undefeated teams behind PSU with better wins on their record, because I've already listed 1 in front of them with less impressive wins and you could probably add Oklahoma to that list as they haven't beaten anyone with a pulse and a terrible Tulane team took them to the wire losing 40-35. So again list all these undefeated teams with better wins than PSU that are ranked behind them.
Notre dame was awful vs FSU and Toledo. Mediocre vs Purdue
You've got to be kidding - ND has more impressive wins on their record now and have looked better than PSU????? A putrid FSU team took ND to Overtime before losing 41-38 and then a horrid Toledo team took them to the wire losing 31-29. How on earth does ND deserve to be ranked in front of PSU???? God Lord you're a moron.
How precisely does Arkansas deserve to be ranked higher than PSU because they're "looking better" than recent years when Arkansas was 3-7 last year and 2-10 the year before that???? It's kind of hard not to look better than recent years when you're 5-17 the last 2 prior years! Again, you're a jackass - I'm done with you.
Watched a lot of Arkansas, have you?
Texas A&M was playing with a back-up QB, who frankly, is about as lousy as Mertz.
My friend. Why so much hostility. We are simply a couple of Penn Staters having a discussion. I didn't shoot your dog. It's fine if we disagree.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
Podcast Jerquaden Guilford Decommits + Top Targets To Replace Him- Latest: NittanyNation51
-