at Allen invitational. Not sure how many teams but at least 10+. His time was 11.48. The winner was 11,44.
He's not doing badly considering he had never run track before this year. He's learning on the fly.at Allen invitational. Not sure how many teams but at least 10+. His time was 11.48. The winner was 11,44.
I have very high hopes for Barkley. It's been a good while since we had a RB who if he breaks into the clear, can walk away from the defensive backs. Even our 1000-yard backs have been brought down from behind on what could have been touchdown runs - haven't had the Mach II speed since LJ Jr.
Now, SB is going to have to block, he's going to have to hang onto the rock, there's a whole different world between Whitehall and the B1G. But he's starting with the physical tools to be really, really good.
I have heard this kid's name before, and believe he was a pretty accomplished high school football player, no? My point is that I'd rather have, for my running back, a football player who dabbles in track than a track star who dabbles in football. Cal has a halfback (Khalfani Muhammad) who runs the 100 meters in the 10.40 neighborhood (i.e., much faster than Barkley), but I'll bet Barkley is FAR better n terms of seeing openings, cutback lanes, and running between the tackles. Speed is great, but it isn't everything.He's not doing badly considering he had never run track before this year. He's learning on the fly.
I have very high hopes for Barkley. It's been a good while since we had a RB who if he breaks into the clear, can walk away from the defensive backs. Even our 1000-yard backs have been brought down from behind on what could have been touchdown runs - haven't had the Mach II speed since LJ Jr.
Now, SB is going to have to block, he's going to have to hang onto the rock, there's a whole different world between Whitehall and the B1G. But he's starting with the physical tools to be really, really good.