ADVERTISEMENT

A USC loss to Minnesota is not a bad thing guys.

Your broadsweeping statement that USC is bad and soft is ridiculous. They aren't either one. Until the damn caved in in the one long run for Michigan which set up their win, USC was crushing them at the LOS, defensively. Michigan couldn't move the ball. USC also beat a talented LSU squad and had a nice win over Wisconsin, who by no means is soft, and has a better QB now than Van Dyke. And, flying across the country to play a minnesota team, which is built on physicality and big ten toughness, and going down to the wire, shows they aren't soft. They've also been more battle tested than us so far since everybody keeps crying about how good bowling green is.

I just find it interesting when some casuals on it here make these extreme statements about opponents and yet penn state hasn't exactly showed physical or mental toughness in their "big brand games" in which they've lost every one of pretty much of consequence for years now. Do you really think James coaches a hard a**, mentally strong team?

Because I think for all the talent we've had, we are tissue paper soft, and at times, embarrassing.

We better come away with a win on Saturday against what is no doubt
A very beatable southern california team. If not, based on your 'analysis' we must also then be a bad and soft team....of which, the latter is hard to disagree with until proven otherwise.
I'm not a casual, I've been going to PSU for over 30 years, have been to over 100 PSU games and over 10 bowl games. USC is soft. They have the Southern Cal mentality, care more about NIL than the team winning.

But it should still be a good game, they have athletes, especially at WR.
 
I'm not a casual, I've been going to PSU for over 30 years, have been to over 100 PSU games and over 10 bowl games. USC is soft. They have the Southern Cal mentality, care more about NIL than the team winning.

But it should still be a good game, they have athletes, especially at WR.
I could say the same for many of our players who recently have bailed on bowl games. Regardless, JF usually fields a mentally soft team, especially in big brand, blue blood matchups. It's why I think we should be underdogs until proven otherwise. His record in games similar to this is terrible. His whole 'we appreciate winning around here after knocking off the Northwesterns of the world is embarrassing. Your statement has to go both ways. Should we lose on Saturday to a supposed soft team, I guess that means we are soft as well, which I would agree with. Now, no doubt the last few yrs, USC has been totally soft and embarrassing on defense, needing to score 50+ pts to beat anyone. But, so far, under Lynn, their defense has been substantially better, and in many cases has saved the offense.
 
Last edited:
Like Urban said… nothing new about this PSU team. It’s the same old same old. Good athletes and good coaching. But can they win big games? We’ll see. Coach K better bring it! That’s what he’s here for.
I hear what you saying about Coach K and I want him to bring it too but the common denominator in Urban’s comment for the last 11 years has been Franklin. And the common denominator for Urban Meyer is that he either gets “sick” and leaves or he gets fired.
 
I could say the same for many of our players who recently have bailed on bowl games. Regardless, JF usually fields a mentally soft team, especially in big brand, blue blood matchups. It's why I think we should be underdogs until proven otherwise. His record in games similar to this is terrible. His whole 'we appreciate winning around here after knocking off the Northwesterns of the world is embarrassing. Your statement has to go both ways. Should we lose on Saturday to a supposed soft team, I guess that means we are soft as well, which I would agree with.
"His record in games similar". His record vs Similar team, unranked opponents as USC will be, is very good actually. So not sure what you’re talking about.

Franklin struggles mightily vs top 10 teams that are actually good. Not sure why you guys think that USC is some powerhouse.
 
"His record in games similar". His record vs Similar team, unranked opponents as USC will be, is very good actually. So not sure what you’re talking about.

Franklin struggles mightily vs top 10 teams that are actually good. Not sure why you guys think that USC is some powerhouse.

They’re seeing the name USC and tucking it between their legs.
 
"His record in games similar". His record vs Similar team, unranked opponents as USC will be, is very good actually. So not sure what you’re talking about.

Franklin struggles mightily vs top 10 teams that are actually good. Not sure why you guys think that USC is some powerhouse.
Sorry.. I should have said versus similar blue blood opponents. So had the Trojans won last night and crept into the top 10, would that have really made a difference with this point? Do you think we are a powerhouse when every year people are talking about us as the best team that can't get over the hump? To me that sounds like an annual pretender but maybe your definition of a powerhouse Juggernaut is different than mine. For the amount of first round talent and numerous draft picks that James has had in his 11 years for his record to be what it is against the programs that are pivotal in accomplishing our goals, to me is pretty embarrassing and soft regardless however you want to spin it. Again circling back to the point of this initial thread, I think it would be the biggest win in the regular season that James would have had to date since the 2017 season if he can pull this off. But based on evidence since that time I'm skeptical for good reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RickinDayton
Sorry since you're being obtuse I should have said versus similar blue blood opponents. So had the Trojans won last night and crept into the top 10, would that have really made a difference with this point? Do you think we are a powerhouse when every year people are talking about us as the best team that can't get over the hump? To me that sounds like an annual pretender but maybe your definition of a powerhouse Juggernaut is different than mine
Yes, USC losing tonight drastically changes things
And "powerhouse" is only relevant when those teams are good
Franklin needs to do better against elite team but USC isn't the type of team he usually loses to
 
I could say the same for many of our players who recently have bailed on bowl games. Regardless, JF usually fields a mentally soft team, especially in big brand, blue blood matchups. It's why I think we should be underdogs until proven otherwise. His record in games similar to this is terrible. His whole 'we appreciate winning around here after knocking off the Northwesterns of the world is embarrassing. Your statement has to go both ways. Should we lose on Saturday to a supposed soft team, I guess that means we are soft as well, which I would agree with.
"His record in games similar". His record vs Similar team, unranked opponents as USC will be, isvery good actually. So not sure what you’re talking about.

Franklin struggles mightily vs top 10 teams that are actually good. Not sure why you guys think that USC is some powerhouse.
They’re seeing the name USC and tucking it between their legs.
Yeah I mean USC just lost to Minnesota who lost to UNC, Michigan and got pounded by Iowa. And they deserved to lose. And they lost to Michigan who got handled by Washington.

Not saying that we'll destroy them but they are an average Big Ten team. And Franklin does very well vs. Average Big Ten teams.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: scrivener
Yes, USC losing tonight drastically changes things
And "powerhouse" is only relevant when those teams are good
Franklin needs to do better against elite team but USC isn't the type of team he usually loses to
I understand what you are saying but how about last year's Ohio State team with a very mediocre quarterback and an offense that was arguably the worst Ryan Day has had since he's been there. That was a very pedestrian Ohio State team by their standards and with our first round left tackle and numerous other draft picks, we vomited all over ourselves. I agree with you that ranking certainly means something when evaluating teams like USC but at the end of the day we know they have a ton of speed offensively and arguably more playmakers on that side of the ball. Regardless what the ranking says, the pressure is 100% on James and Penn State to avoid being the annual fraud. That to me is why this is a monumental game. It's all about perception and results at this point for James and the program, which is why this is a gargantuan opportunity against a big brand that is down and why if we don't capitalize I'm not sure we ever will under this guy
 
I understand what you are saying but how about last year's Ohio State team with a very mediocre quarterback and an offense that was arguably the worst Ryan Day has had since he's been there. That was a very pedestrian Ohio State team by their standards and with our first round left tackle and numerous other draft picks, we vomited all over ourselves. I agree with you that ranking certainly means something when evaluating teams like USC but at the end of the day we know they have a ton of speed offensively and arguably more playmakers on that side of the ball. Regardless what the ranking says, the pressure is 100% on James and Penn State to avoid being the annual fraud. That to me is why this is a monumental game.
Pedestrian by Ohio State standards isn't pedestrian though. They were definitely better than us.
If your argument is we can't beat Ohio State this year I can get on board but this USC team isn't half as good as last year's Ohio State team.
So, does USC actually have that because, if they do, they didn't show up against Minnesota who doesn't have nearly the defense we have
It is a monumental game because he should win it--I just don't share your concern. He beats teams he's supposed to like USC this year. Ohio State last year wasn't a game he was supposed to win--still an awful performance but Ohio State was significantly better.
 
I understand what you are saying but how about last year's Ohio State team with a very mediocre quarterback and an offense that was arguably the worst Ryan Day has had since he's been there. That was a very pedestrian Ohio State team by their standards and with our first round left tackle and numerous other draft picks, we vomited all over ourselves. I agree with you that ranking certainly means something when evaluating teams like USC but at the end of the day we know they have a ton of speed offensively and arguably more playmakers on that side of the ball. Regardless what the ranking says, the pressure is 100% on James and Penn State to avoid being the annual fraud. That to me is why this is a monumental game. It's all about perception and results at this point for James and the program, which is why this is a gargantuan opportunity against a big brand that is down and why if we don't capitalize I'm not sure we ever will under this guy
Comparing last year's Ohio State vs. USC this year is laughable, sorry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wilbury
Also USC is not typically a tough venue. Crowds tend to be fickle and I’m sure losing to Minnesota isn’t going to help to make it hostile.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scrivener
Comparing last year's Ohio State vs. USC this year is laughable, sorry.
Okay, so what would be your reasoning and your response on here should we lose on saturday? Based on your logic, then, we should be ultrasoft if we can't beat a bad soft, big ten team, correct?

You, I, and obviously, so many of us watch college football weekly. So we know that it's a match up sport...every week is different. With the exception of their fourth quarter against michigan last week, minnesota has looked like a** all season and yet pulled out a big win. I think vanderbilt will still struggle to make a bowl game and they pulled the biggest win maybe in their school's history. Arkansas has sucked, and they beat Tennessee.

Now I think we should be favored by at least a touchdown. I agree with you top to bottom our roster is better and we are primed to win this game....I think we're the better team.But that means nothing to me under this head coach in pivotal games for the program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RickinDayton
Okay, so what would be your reasoning and your response on here should we lose on saturday? Based on your logic, then, we should be ultrasoft if we can't beat a bad soft, big ten team, correct?

You, I, and obviously, so many of us watch college football weekly. So we know that it's a match up sport...every week is different. With the exception of their fourth quarter against michigan last week, minnesota has looked like a** all season and yet pulled out a big win. I think vanderbilt will still struggle to make a bowl game and they pulled the biggest win maybe in their school's history. Arkansas has sucked, and they beat Tennessee.

Now I think we should be favored by at least a touchdown. I agree with you top to bottom our roster is better and we are primed to win this game....I think we're the better team.But that means nothing in college football, and to me it means nothing under this head coach until proven otherwise.
Not who you asked--but if we lose on Saturday then it's a coaching failure--on a level we haven't seen from Franklin since 2021. It's not about Michigan or Ohio State

Bama thought they could sleep walk through Vandy and got surprised. When you don't show up that happens. Similar things with Tennessee against Arkansas. Both had big wins the week prior (UGa and OU) and didn't prep the way they needed to.

We've aren't coming off a big game--if anything we were probably looking ahead.
 
Okay, so what would be your reasoning and your response on here should we lose on saturday? Based on your logic, then, we should be ultrasoft if we can't beat a bad soft, big ten team, correct?

You, I, and obviously, so many of us watch college football weekly. So we know that it's a match up sport...every week is different. With the exception of their fourth quarter against michigan last week, minnesota has looked like a** all season and yet pulled out a big win. I think vanderbilt will still struggle to make a bowl game and they pulled the biggest win maybe in their school's history. Arkansas has sucked, and they beat Tennessee.

Now I think we should be favored by at least a touchdown. I agree with you top to bottom our roster is better and we are primed to win this game....I think we're the better team.But that means nothing to me under this head coach in pivotal games for the program.
If we lose then we lost to an average Big Ten team on the road. It could happen. They have very talented wrs so hopefully we can cover them well enough. We will miss Winston in this game for sure. Hopefully we have Singleton back bc that would be a big loss if he's out.
 
If we lose then we lost to an average Big Ten team on the road. It could happen.
And, we could also win and should. I agree with you. Sorry for the 'casual' comment...appreciate the convo. I just find it very challenging to be ultra confident with JF, Drew and the guys in really a must win game and a should win game, that can really move the needle for the program. I guess we will see. Hopefully u are right. If we don't have Nick back, I think we lose.
 
And, we could also win and should. I agree with you. Sorry for the 'casual' comment...appreciate the convo. I just find it very challenging to be ultra confident with JF, Drew and the guys in really a must win game and a should win game, that can really move the needle for the program. I guess we will see. Hopefully u are right. If we don't have Nick back, I think we lose.
I'm uber-confident in Drew....just worry about the supporting cast but that will come into play against Ohio State not USC IMO
I don't think USC moves the needle though--I think everyone expects us to win. Only beating Ohio State changes the narrative...or winning a playoff game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scrivener
And, we could also win and should. I agree with you. Sorry for the 'casual' comment...appreciate the convo. I just find it very challenging to be ultra confident with JF, Drew and the guys in really a must win game and a should win game, that can really move the needle for the program. I guess we will see. Hopefully u are right. If we don't have Nick back, I think we lose.
Yeah I agree it's still a big game vs a blue blood. And Franklin has gotten a little tight in these games over the years but that's normally when the other teams are better than us. And we're the better team in this game. Franklin hasn't lost many games when he has the better team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scrivener
Yeah I agree it's still a big game vs a blue blood. And Franklin has gotten a little tight in these games over the years but that's normally when the other teams are better than us. And we're the better team in this game. Franklin hasn't lost many games when he has the better team.
True....when he is tight, u can also see it in the players. That is an area where I think he has to defer more to the coordinators...his risk aversion philosophy gets you close to the finish line, but hasn't proved to be the winning formula in those particular games. I'll be there in the Coliseum rooting us on.
 
True....when he is tight, u can also see it in the players. That is an area where I think he has to defer more to the coordinators...his risk aversion philosophy gets you close to the finish line, but hasn't proved to be the winning formula in those particular games. I'll be there in the Coliseum rooting us on.
Also, something to recognize is that OL's on past Franklin's teams have struggled to run the ball to close out games. This is his best OL to date, imo. Also he doesn't have Brent "Prevent D" Pry as D coordinator anymore to choke games away on defense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scrivener
Also, something to recognize is that OL's on past Franklin's teams have struggled to run the ball to close out games. This is his best OL to date, imo. Also he doesn't have Brent "Prevent D" Pry as D coordinator anymore to choke games away on defense.
Well, that is true. This group of OL guys, from the 1s and 2s certainly appear to be the most talented and higher ceiling group he's had. Especially run blocking. They might struggle a bit more in pass pro...but the run blocking is critical.

JF always says it annually about how they need to be able to run the ball not only when they want to, but when they have to. Obviously, they haven't really been able to do that during his time, but one has to think this group has the best chance up front to do so.
 
Well, that is true. This group of OL guys, from the 1s and 2s certainly appear to be the most talented and higher ceiling group he's had. Especially run blocking. They might struggle a bit more in pass pro...but the run blocking is critical.

JF always says it annually about how they need to be able to run the ball not only when they want to, but when they have to. Obviously, they haven't really been able to do that during his time, but one has to think this group has the best chance up front to do so.
Yeah, I mean a good example of this is vs USC in the Rose Bowl.
 
First of all it shows that USC is not a good team. We are clearly better, especially up front on both sides of the ball.

These soft teams like USC start to lose that confidence and swag once they start losing a few games.

I think that if we take it to them a little but, especially in the trenches they could fold early.
PSU needs a breakout game against USC like the game @ Auburn two years ago. That was total domination.
 
Like Urban said… nothing new about this PSU team. It’s the same old same old. Good athletes and good coaching. But can they win big games? We’ll see. Coach K better bring it! That’s what he’s here for.
PSU needs to put the hammer down on USC like they did a few yeas ago @ Auburn.
 
Sorry.. I should have said versus similar blue blood opponents. So had the Trojans won last night and crept into the top 10, would that have really made a difference with this point? Do you think we are a powerhouse when every year people are talking about us as the best team that can't get over the hump? To me that sounds like an annual pretender but maybe your definition of a powerhouse Juggernaut is different than mine. For the amount of first round talent and numerous draft picks that James has had in his 11 years for his record to be what it is against the programs that are pivotal in accomplishing our goals, to me is pretty embarrassing and soft regardless however you want to spin it. Again circling back to the point of this initial thread, I think it would be the biggest win in the regular season that James would have had to date since the 2017 season if he can pull this off. But based on evidence since that time I'm skeptical for good reason.
So exactly what is your point? Franklin has a bad record vs top, ranked opponents but an excellent record versus everyone else. It doesn't matter if they are 'blue blood' or not. So I think it's pretty obvious that whether or not USC won last night matters a great deal.

You just hate Franklin that's all. It's pretty simple.

If we win, it's just 'well we should have won, USC is a soft team and we have better athletes', but if we lose 'we've always been soft under Franklin and he can never win the big game'.
 
So exactly what is your point? Franklin has a bad record vs top, ranked opponents but an excellent record versus everyone else. It doesn't matter if they are 'blue blood' or not. So I think it's pretty obvious that whether or not USC won last night matters a great deal.

You just hate Franklin that's all. It's pretty simple.

If we win, it's just 'well we should have won, USC is a soft team and we have better athletes', but if we lose 'we've always been soft under Franklin and he can never win the big game'.
Incorrect. If we win, I think it's massive for him and the program, even if USC is down. We do have better players as a whole and more experience in key spots, but u won't catch me on here saying they weren't that good. It's a major brand coached by a guy who has coached 3 Heisman winners and been to the playoffs. Would be a big win. And, yes, if we lose, how can u not argue that JF can't win big regular season games.
 
Exactly. Nothing under JF for yrs now gives me this over the top confidence like we are this unstoppable force. I think we have the better roster and should win...but unfortunately I have serious doubts until JF proves it.

I think we’ll get a quick insight next week with how the team starts. If they come out flat again with everything on the line then buckle up for a tight game. SC will be fired up after the Minny loss
 
  • Like
Reactions: scrivener
I hear what you saying about Coach K and I want him to bring it too but the common denominator in Urban’s comment for the last 11 years has been Franklin. And the common denominator for Urban Meyer is that he either gets “sick” and leaves or he gets fired.
I'd rather stay clean and go 10-2 with Franklin than go through the Urban Meyer experience. He gets sick, forgetful, etc. Sometimes he accidentally deletes all the texts on his phone.
 
Pedestrian by Ohio State standards isn't pedestrian though. They were definitely better than us.
If your argument is we can't beat Ohio State this year I can get on board but this USC team isn't half as good as last year's Ohio State team.
So, does USC actually have that because, if they do, they didn't show up against Minnesota who doesn't have nearly the defense we have
It is a monumental game because he should win it--I just don't share your concern. He beats teams he's supposed to like USC this year. Ohio State last year wasn't a game he was supposed to win--still an awful performance but Ohio State was significantly better.
The line is 3.5 in our favor so certainly no gimmie and it should shock no one if USC wins.

I see where Scrivener is coming from and it has to do with our ability/Franklin's ability to win a road game against a solid opponent with relatively equal talent. We beat Purdue and Auburn on the road in 2022. Probably our two biggest road wins but Auburn was so lousy it probably is only the Purdue win that could be considered "big". Maybe USC is equal to 2022 Purdue. I would think USC '24 is more talented. In 2023 we beat no one of consequence on the road. This year WVU could not match our talent level at any position. USC can.

As for USC, they beat LSU who is good and then really should have beaten Michigan in the Big House. Yes, I know Michigan is not great but they are a solid team. The USC loss last night was a bad one and we will beat them if they play like that again but I know they won't. Does anyone think they will play that poorly at home with a shot to knock off the #4 team? No way.

Franklin has not built my confidence that he can take the team into a hostile environment versus an opponent of relatively equal talent with a ton riding on the outcome and win. He has not demonstrated that he has built a team with the mental fortitude to gut out a tough road win making the clutch plays. Albeit the Purdue '22 win was good but I think this USC team is a step up from that Purdue team. I guess just too many battle scars from OSU losses and recently Michigan losses. Yes, I understand this USC team is not the Ohio State teams of years past and recent Michigan outfits. However, they have high end talent certainly at QB and WR. Also, I look back at that '23 OSU game and cringe. It was a winnable game for us. McCord was not that good. We were just putrid both Allar and the whole offensive game plan.

Will that type of game rear its ugly head again? I hope not but I have not seen enough out of this team this year to say that it definitely won't happen again. Yurcich is gone but Franklin is still here. Can Allar be the guy who we all have been expecting and hoping for to carry us to a signature road win? Can Franklin devise an innovative game plan to get us the W?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RickinDayton
Usc drops out of the coaches poll. Not saying we can’t lose but this isn’t the type of game Franklin has struggled with recently.
We haven't really played a team on the road of USC's caliber the last two years and won with the possible exception of Purdue in '22 and we barely won.
 
I would like to see PSU adjust the team's sleep schedule so that we wake up BEFORE the start of the game rather than in the middle of the 2d or 3d quarter. Perhaps the cross country trip will enable this adjustment.
 
All I got to say is Welcome to the Big Ten! Not as many cupcake teams here
 
USC was a -9.5 favorite over Minnesota. Looking at the information available, this was a sloppy first half by both teams. Missed FG by USC, fumbles by both teams, USC was lucky to be tied at halftime.

Game seemed to shift on Moss's 1st int. Trojans had just scored (led 17-10), stopped a decent Minny drive (12 plays, 45 yards), and beat bad field position (punt downed inside the 5) with their own 60 yard drive before the turnover.

Minny cashes in (6 plays, 65 yards, TD) then gets the stop (USC goes 3 and out) which sets up their game winning drive (12 plays, 75 yards, leaving only a minute on the clock). A 2nd Moss pick seals it.

For whatever reason, the USC passing game wasn't extraordinary vs Minny. 200 yards on 23/38 passing. They seemed to be rushing fine (Marks had 134 yards on 20 rushes, 6.7 ypc).

The new clock rules from last year seem to benefit rushing teams and are lowering the number of possessions in games in total. 4 or 5 possessions per half is average and depending on when you take the ball, that's the half you will get 5.

I think this game deals a bigger blow to what USC is much more than improving what we thought about Minnesota.
 
I think having Coach K at OC may be the difference at USC. I have been impressed with how he has been able to design the offense to our players’ strengths. I also think that there will be some wrinkles unveiled on Saturday that USC hasn’t seen on film.

If Penn State is the team we think it is, USC will be our best effort to date this season.
Penn State really should win this game, but based on history it also won’t surprise me if we get tight again and lay an egg.
 
We haven't really played a team on the road of USC's caliber the last two years and won with the possible exception of Purdue in '22 and we barely won.
Who was the last unranked team to beat us on the road?
 
Who was the last unranked team to beat us on the road?
I don't know but I know Illinois beat us at home in '21.

USC is a good team but yeah they are unranked now. They have to be in top 30. Many of the teams we have beaten on the road in the last couple of years are sub .500 type teams and/or without talent approaching what USC has.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT