there seems to be a number of very high profile schools moving to the "no standardized test needed" for application/admission. anyone heard PSU stance on this. I certainly hope we don't join this strange trend. without some type of objective measure, how do you select students for admission or deny them admission? we have grade inflation in K-12, so the tests are the last shot at differentiating students. I realize the argument is that they are not fair or favor the students who can afford to get prepared. But that is life = it ain't fair. if anyone of us were bigger, faster, smarter, more athletic, more connected = we would likely have gotten further in life.
Interestingly, the ABA just increased the standard for law school accreditation.....each school must have 75% pass rate of each cohort within 2 years of graduation. this is to create a stronger standard in the practice of law per the ABA. the opponents argued that this will make the LSAT become a bigger part of acceptance especially at elite schools along with an effort to weed out the weak students in L1. the opponents were arguing for diminished LSAT and more "holistic grading" in L1.
Interestingly, the ABA just increased the standard for law school accreditation.....each school must have 75% pass rate of each cohort within 2 years of graduation. this is to create a stronger standard in the practice of law per the ABA. the opponents argued that this will make the LSAT become a bigger part of acceptance especially at elite schools along with an effort to weed out the weak students in L1. the opponents were arguing for diminished LSAT and more "holistic grading" in L1.