ADVERTISEMENT

Appears BOT will rubber stamp CJF extension/contract extended

In the stat the poster listed, Franklin DOES compare very favorably to those two. That's all that was posted. If you read more into it than that, then that's on you

Yes he does, in the stat the poster listed.

In the stats I listed, not so much.
 
Nope. What's dumb is comparing him to Dabo and Saban at this point in time.

Well who are you comparing him too then? You tell people to pump the breaks, well at least bring out a name. I mean Franlin is in the top 5 in W's the last 5 years and so are those 2, but yeah....we cannot say our coach is good until he wins a MNC because some fans want or need to police enthusiasm over a HC. You suck as a HC until you win a MNC....I got it.
 
It’s actually a comparison to every coach. He’s third — ahead of a bunch of guys I won’t list. Is that an acceptable way to present the statistic?

Guy's a hater. That's all I'm sorry I wasted as much time on him as I have.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MJG-90
Guy's a hater. That's all I'm sorry I wasted as much time on him as I have.

Not a hater at all. I'm just saying that at this point in time, it's stupid to put Franklin in the same category as Dabo and Saban….again, at this point in time.

Sure, the winning % stat in the last 4 years compares favorably, but other just-as-important stats do not.

That's all I am saying. If you can't handle that, then that's on you.
 
Not a hater at all. I'm just saying that at this point in time, it's stupid to put Franklin in the same category as Dabo and Saban….again, at this point in time.

Sure, the winning % stat in the last 4 years compares favorably, but other just-as-important stats do not.

That's all I am saying. If you can't handle that, then that's on you.

Good grief. You went out of your way to take a shot at Franklin. The post you responded to was not in any way, shape or form making the argument that Franklin has been as successful as Sweeney and Saban. Not even a little bit. You created that strawman so that you could shoot it down. Because you're a hater. See ya...
 
Good grief. You went out of your way to take a shot at Franklin. The post you responded to was not in any way, shape or form making the argument that Franklin has been as successful as Sweeney and Saban. Not even a little bit. You created that strawman so that you could shoot it down. Because you're a hater. See ya...

Poor guy. Someone didn't agree with you. Maybe you'll have a better day tomorrow.

What argument was the post I responded to making then? Is winning % not a measure of success?
 
Poor guy. Someone didn't agree with you.

Because you are wrong (per an earlier post I made in this thread explaining it) but are too stubborn (or just ignorant) to admit it. Another dope to ignore I guess.
 
Because you are wrong (per an earlier post I made in this thread explaining it) but are too stubborn (or just ignorant) to admit it. Another dope to ignore I guess.

Wrong about what? And what's with the name calling? You having a bad day, too?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT