Bradley Statement to Deadspin
- Thread starter Yboby
- Start date
I could be wrong, but it appears that there has been one "kingmaker" in Pa. for a long time.
There is where the Press should be going. Not 40 years into the past on a rant of the most absurd of allegations!!!
The REAL VICTIMS HERE are the citizens of the State of PA and anyone who the corrupt PA Legal system (run by an influential cartel of "connected elites") has "processed".
I also suspect that abuse of Paterno and the abuse of the PSU community by the illegally conducted justice system in the state is just the tip of the iceberg. This is criminality that pales in what Sandusky is in jail for..... This is at a scale of MILLIONS of victims!!!!
The play on social media is to call them liars, but they use all caps (LIARS!).
And as much as I don't want to believe it, everyone knows using all caps will make anything you type super extra true.
In addition, it in no way suggests that his knowledge gained somewhere between 2003-2011 was that MM saw and eyewitnessed JS explicitly sexually assaulting a child OR that his knowledge was anything more than what MM told Dr. Dranov, his father, JVP, TC or GS.....that MM saw JS in the Lasch communal shower via two quick "1 or 2 second glances" via a mirror in the shower area (e.g., likely at least partially fogged) and JS was standing in close proximity to the child and had touched his upper back and torso with his hands in some fashion and MM found the entire situation extremely "inappropriate" at best and was "concerned" it may have been something far worse, but explicitly stated repeatedly that he did not actually see his worst concerns, ONLY ACTUALLY saw what he had stated (and even that for two "1 or 2 second glances" into a mirror at a distance which was potentially fogged - everybody knows mirrors are unreliable for "depth" perception - e.g., proximity of parties) and IN FACT did not see anything below either parties' waist while they were in the shower......nor did the child act "distressed" in any way.......nor was there any noise whatsoever coming from the shower, including "vocalizations" of any kind from either party, other than the sound of the running shower.......and when MM walked over to the shower to look directly in only moments later - both parties had left the shower area and had towels wrapped around them and were acting perfectly normal.....child seemed in no distress whatsoever.....etc.....
Last edited:
Of course I would expect them to deny it. So here's what it all comes down to in my mind.
- Does it make sense that Joe would know JS was abusing kids and allow him to continue unabated? Even if he wanted to keep a lid on things, wouldn't he have still fired Jerry to put an end to it and to make sure it wouldn't happen again?
- Does it make sense that Schiano, Bradley, Ganter, the AD (Jim) and others also knew and did nothing? Is it rational to think that so many adults in high positions would allow abuse to continue unabated for decades?
- Is it suspicious that these victims said nothing to anybody else for decades, that they miraculously found the courage when $millions were on the line, but now have gone back into a shell after collecting their money? Wouldn't they want to testify for the benefit of other victims?
- Does it make sense that the parents who were told would just let the whole thing drop?
- Does it make sense that Central Mountain High School officials were also in on the alleged coverup?
- And what about officials at TSM?
- Does it make sense that child welfare agencies couldn't find anything on JS and that they continued to approve adoptions? Couldn't investigators get any of the dozens of people who allegedly knew to speak up?
- Does it make sense that MM was too distraught (hours later) to tell his father and Dranov that he witnessed sexual abuse?
- JS was good at quietly grooming kids.
- The people who "witnessed" JS wrestling, hugging, showering, etc. believed that was just his style and they were fooled.
- Same for the people who heard second hand accounts.
- When the $h!t hit the fan a lot of people kept their mouths shut because they didn't want to be accused of failing to do more to stop Jerry.
- The BOT in particular decided to throw some people under the bus in an effort to keep the spotlight off of themselves (especially since many had ties to TSM).
Simply put, "the press" absent a rebirth of Woodward and Bernstein doesn't have the character, the intellectual curiosity, or the budget to dig as deep as this must go.
They indicted the "PSU 3" to silence them so they could not testify against MM and the State's ridiculous case (the False Narrative) - heck the freaking unnecessary SWIGJ and its provably false Presentment via their own frigging "STAR EYEWITNESS' " words, who UNEQUOVICALY stated in a PA Court of Law multiple times under oath that he absolutely DID NOT see or EYEWITNESS an explicit sexual assault of any kind and NEVER told anyone he had, was executed to perpetrate their tyranny and victimize not only the PSU 3, but the entire PSU community devaluing all of them via massive, irresponsible and unnecessary damage to PSU's reputation! Not to mention, the intentional abuse of Fiduciary Obligation in the raping and pillaging of PSU's assets and resources in their self-serving quest to use PSU as a "Fall Guy" Cover factory and Indemnity Company -- massive abuse of Fiduciary Obligation coupled with attempted Insurance Fraud by attempting to pass the PSU payouts onto PMA without ever vetting them or giving PMA a chance to vet them!!!
Also to your point, I'm pretty sure that Matt Sandusky was officially ADOPTED after the DPW's Investigation in 1998 via the DPW's Centre County CYS Office which had multiple parties who participated in the 1998 Investigation (especially John Miller who made all the arrangements to subcontract Seasock and for Seasock to speak with the child - DPW was also aware of Chamber's standing report as Chamber's was the "Mandatory Reporter" who called in the CSA Report to DPW's Child Abuse Hotline and identified herself as a Mandatory Reporter and why she was a Mandatory Reporter).
Matt Sandusky was adopted just after he turned 18 (again, I believe this places the adoption after the 1998 Incident and DPW Investigation) and was a "Foster Child" prior to his adoption. DPW subcontracted to TSM in regards to all of the "evaluation" work for both Matt Sandusky and JS in regards to BOTH Matt being placed with the Sandusky's in regards to the State (e.g., DPW) Administered Foster Parenting and Adoption Programs. How is PSU in any way whatsoever responsible for Matt Sandusky being placed with JS in regards to both the DPW Administered Foster Parenting and Adoption Programs??? Or the DPW's use of TSM on a SUBCONTRACTED "Agency Basis" for both the placements in the Foster Parenting and Adoption Programs????
That is a near-perfect summary. Mind if I borrow it when sending correspondence to people who should be investigating this?
That's the problem. Those who have their minds made up will say, "Of course Bradley and Schiano will deny it. What else would you expect them to do?" They are in a no win situation thanks to our BoT which has used a broad brush to paint everyone associated with PSU as being guilty of something. Here's a thought which people don't want to hear - Bradley and Schiano could very well be telling the truth.
Matt was placed as a foster kid BEFORE any formal accusations against Sandusky. He chose to let the Sandusky family afopt him as an adult. Way to shift blame on while accusing others of doing the same.
Perhaps because he was stunned. We all have the benefit of context and hindsight, which he did not. He grew up in State College, played for Sandusky, knew him well and apparently happened upon him late at night in what either sounded like or appeared to be a sex act with a minor. His fight or flight kicked in, he was stunned and struggling to process what he saw and he bolted. How is that difficult to understand?
"Stunned" explains the first five seconds of behavior. Since McQueary shows signs of being slow, I'll give him ten. Beyond that, it's cowardice or absence of character.
Considering, given his size and age, McQueary could have probably beat Sandusky to a pulp with one hand tied behind his back, your analysis of the situation makes little sense.
No dip$hit, Matt Sandusky was ADOPTED after the 1998 Incident - btw, he was a FOSTER CHILD prior to the 1998 Incident (and Sandusky had 5 ADOPTED kids prior to 1998 living in his household), but the DPW never thought to interview any of Sandusky's DPW, STATE ADOPTED or FOSTER children during the 1998 Incident......nor did the DPW ever create a "Safety Plan" in regards to the 1998 Incident which they are LEGALLY REQUIRED TO DO as per PA CPSL, the governing PA LAW applicable to the 1998 Incident!!!
What a bunch of laughable BULL$HIT that somehow PSU is now "primarily responsible" for the State of Pennsylvania's Adoption and Foster Parenting Programs?!?! Shifting blame as to who is responsible for allowing Sandusky to become either the Adoptive or Foster Parent for DOUBLE DIGIT children for decades and decades??? WTF are you talking about you know-nothing @sshole, prevaricator and douche-bag??? PSU has nothing to do with the State of Pennsylvania's Adoprtion and Foster Parenting Programs you fargging worthless piece of excrement!
Seriously? You seem to agree with me, but if you want to convince yourself otherwise go right on ahead.
Uh, look who's talking. You sound mentally challenged. No one had ANY reason to be suspicious of Sandusky (he was cleared in 1998 incident, btw) before he was reported, and there was no reason for anyone to deny him the chance to foster or adopt children. He had no criminal record. Matt was a grown man when he LET the family adopt him, why would the authorities stop him from adopting a grownup who could take care of himself? I'd go harder on you, but I don't make fun of people with special needs. You are just engaging in blame-shifting, because you think whining about a man with no criminal record being allowed to adopt kids will somehow make the media stop attacking Penn State. It won't.
Last edited:
So, as an adult, Matt agreed to be adopted by the guy who molested him? Do you really think that sounds more believable than Matt decided to make a cash grab from Penn State?
Similar threads
