I eventually put him on ignore but wasn't this tool carrying on about the state having some bomb shell evidence that would be introduced at trial? The state's case seems to be a re-tread of what they have been saying for 5 1/2 years. Am I missing something? Was Jack "wear swim trunks" Raykovitz or victim 5 the bombshell? I am calling BS on his alleged insider info. Just another troll here to stir the pot.