Because Paterno wasn't on trial.Based on what? Why would this not have been reported six years ago?
Because Paterno wasn't on trial.Based on what? Why would this not have been reported six years ago?
Yeah, it depends on things like testimony and police reports. That's why your baseless opinion is worthless.
Especially when the Police Report claim (which is not a "quote" of any kind contrary to Ganim's insinuation) are utterly CONTRADICTED by under oath ON THE RECORD QUOTES in a PA Court of Law from McQueary's own mouth to the freaking Grand Jury in question and again multiple times At-Trial!!! IOW, the FACTUAL COURT STATEMENTS of McQueary trump Ganim's lame claims here 10x over and then some - Ganim's citation is not "admissible evidence" from a PA Court of Law, while the PROVEN diametric opposite position is the RESULT of PROVEN Admissible-Evidence from both At-Trial and from the Grand Jury!
Mike gave that statement in November 2010.
It's far more credible than sticking your fingers in your ears, closing your eyes and pretending that nothing happened. That seems to be something that happens a lot on this board.Because McQueary said it and you believe it. That's compelling.
The only thing I'm hoping moves on is you jizz wad.A police report is fake news?
You can question the timing or the motive, but this is real. Time to accept reality that Paterno failed and move on.
That will probably come out in the movie.Better wait for 6 more years. I understand they're jinning up a report that says Paterno threatened McQueary's life if he went to the police. That will be a good one.
Here we go...Better wait for 6 more years. I understand they're jinning up a report that says Paterno threatened McQueary's life if he went to the police. That will be a good one.
And another thing or two....This is an unforced error by the person or persons who feed the info to Ganim. It was likely a quid pro quo that it be released today, of all days.
Which, I think, gives us a clue as to who and what is behind the thing.
People keep forgetting that politicians in both parties campaigned on the platform that PSU would play Pitt every year. Every year. The beatings will continue until we do. If I am PSU, I unilaterally cancel the rest of the series as of today, just on the chance that I am right about this. On the other hand, the Pitt politicos may be trying to set up a scenario where Pitt can run away from the series as "heroes."
Thanks Dave. Offering nothing but anger as usual.The only thing I'm hoping moves on is you jizz wad.
It's far more credible than sticking your fingers in your ears, closing your eyes and pretending that nothing happened. That seems to be something that happens a lot on this board.
What motive would McQueary have to lie about this? Let's hear the speculation.
It's far more credible than sticking your fingers in your ears, closing your eyes and pretending that nothing happened. That seems to be something that happens a lot on this board.
What motive would McQueary have to lie about this? Let's hear the speculation.
Hold on there, Chewie, you're relying on what McQueary said? Nah.
That has zero to do with pinning it on the old man unless you wear a thick tin foil hat. JZ has made you people think that is a viable explanation; it's not.I could link you to one of his pictures he didn't want his X-wife to know about, but that would break the Board rules.
Not just what McQueary said, but what he said ON THE RECORD multiple times under oath in a PA Court of Law. Ganim's bull$hit on the other hand is a "characterization" (not a quote) of what the PA Police "claim" McQueary said in November 2011 (which again diametrically contradicts what we KNOW McQueary told the 30th Statewide Grand Investigating Grand Jury almost a year earlier?)?
IOW, one is a known Court-Established FACT (i.e., that McQueary, according to his own lips, never gave any details or descriptions of sexual assault or a sexual act whatsoever to his father or Dr. Dranov while the incident was still IN_PROGRESS nor did he give them to Paterno the next morning); while the other is the hearsay of a reporter regarding claimed "characterizations" by proven corrupt PA Prosecutors and Investigators who have already been found guilty of "prosecutorial misconduct" by the Pennsylvania Judiciary!
Saying that this was a second report that Paterno received doesn't do anything to make mike look better.What motive would someone who did nothing when he reportedly kid being sodomized have to lie? What motive would he have if he kept silent about it for ten years? Yeah, McQueary just oozes credibility and rectitude.
It could certainly have been 98 or something else. But to just dismiss it as Mike lying is silly.It suggest it was the second time he heard about something, and everyone already assumed he had at some point heard about the fact that JS was accused and cleared in 1998, so I'm not sure what the story is.
Saying that this was a second report that Paterno received doesn't do anything to make mike look better.
It could certainly have been 98 or something else. But to just dismiss it as Mike lying is silly.
What motive would someone who did nothing when he reportedly kid being sodomized have to lie? What motive would he have if he kept silent about it for ten years? Yeah, McQueary just oozes credibility and rectitude.
It does help sell a book and generate clicks.
Clicks maybe, but that book is going staright to the remainder bin, if it's published at all.
People lie under oath, Chewie.
Not a good way to start the day. . .
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/09/us/penn-state-paterno-sandusky-police-report/index.html
Because Paterno wasn't on trial.
This is an unforced error by the person or persons who feed the info to Ganim. It was likely a quid pro quo that it be released today, of all days.
Which, I think, gives us a clue as to who and what is behind the thing.
People keep forgetting that politicians in both parties campaigned on the platform that PSU would play Pitt every year. Every year. The beatings will continue until we do. If I am PSU, I unilaterally cancel the rest of the series as of today, just on the chance that I am right about this. On the other hand, the Pitt politicos may be trying to set up a scenario where Pitt can run away from the series as "heroes."
We already knew Paterno failed... move on. Pitt game is today. It should be fun watching us drop half a hundred on them.
All I said was that he failed. And he did. Nothing more, nothing less.LOL....
Your choice of words shows you have some sort of anti Paterno agenda. Not sure why.
Paterno made a mistake. Lot's of individuals made mistakes with Sandusky. Do we really need to list them all?
Not a good way to start the day. . .
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/09/us/penn-state-paterno-sandusky-police-report/index.html
All I said was that he failed. And he did. Nothing more, nothing less.
LOL....
Your choice of words shows you have some sort of anti Paterno agenda. Not sure why.
Paterno made a mistake. Lot's of individuals made mistakes with Sandusky. Do we really need to list them all?
What? I clearly believe that he failed. So did Paterno himself per his own words.Please.... No one believes that. Even you don't because I read some of your other posts. Don't be ridiculous.
Not really! Don't be so insecure. Plus he's right! Move on and let's score 4 more TDs.
I'm still hoping for half a hundred.Not really! Don't be so insecure. Plus he's right! Move on and let's score 4 more TDs.
What? I clearly believe that he failed. So did Paterno himself per his own words.
He knew enough to know that it was if a sexual nature, per his own testimony.I clearly believe he made a mistake.
His words reflected on what he knew after the GJ presentment. Are you suggesting he knew that "detail" at the time?
He knew enough to know that it was if a sexual nature, per his own testimony.
And I can link you to motive for C/S/S not going to authorities. From the same day Curley sent his change of plan email:I could link you to one of his pictures he didn't want his X-wife to know about, but that would break the Board rules.
And I can link you to motive for C/S/S not going to authorities. From the same day Curley sent his change of plan email:
http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archives/article_0c2322c5-a775-5e45-a9cf-f3266a07f6b3.html
Stop lobbing accusations unless you want even more of Spanier's history put on blast.