When @dicemen99 gets off his fat asswhen will the eligibility and recruit target spread sheet be updated. Mostly good as a reference tool.
I always pictured a svelte Diceman. Guy hustles.When @dicemen99 gets off his fat ass![]()
There was a day when this could be closeLooks like this?
![]()
thanksDid a quick makeover - let me know if I missed anything. How's that for hustle?
It is pinned up in the Sticky Threads ..How can I access the spreadsheet?
Thanks for the update, unfortunately Richie Figs verbally committed to ASU so you can take him off. Though he is still a HS sophomore and it is only a verbal...better leave him on there.Did a quick makeover - let me know if I missed anything. How's that for hustle?
This might be too tall for the Tomasello build ...@dicemen99 , is your call of Robbie Howard at 133 about PSU's needs or where you really see Howard winding up? I know nothing other the few videos I've seen, but he kind of reminds me of NaTo, build-wise.
It is pinned up in the Sticky Threads ..
Do you see where it says click here? Click there.Thanks, but when I open the sticky thread I don't see spreadsheet![]()
I'm guessing you didn't read the one post by Tim in that thread, there's a link to it there. But here as well.Thanks, but when I open the sticky thread I don't see spreadsheet![]()
@dicemen99 , is your call of Robbie Howard at 133 about PSU's needs or where you really see Howard winding up? I know nothing other the few videos I've seen, but he kind of reminds me of NaTo, build-wise.
Is stevo poulin in the mix at all?It was about me being hurried at lunch and just moving the prospects over 1 column.
Now that I have some time, I'll use the infamous eye test and stick him at 125. I'm also of the opinion that guys that can wrestle at 125 without too much compromise are generally highly motivated to do so - much more so than any other weight class - so I'll use that for a reason as well.
Of course, I'm as likely as Cael or Christian Pyles or Howard himself or Wild Turk to be accurate in that assessment. It's too far away for anyone with 125s.
I have no idea.Is stevo poulin in the mix at all?
I read that Cassar and Rasheed both got their medical 6th years. Any word on Conel?
I'm assuming there is some sort of deadline for applying and for the NCAA to decide. But it's the NCAA, so...
I guess my question was not really about your spreadsheet, but this seemed like a logical place to ask about Conel updates without starting a new thread.Shak announced that he would be back at the banquet - he's not in italics and is listed in bold as a returning starter at 184.
AC has not announced whether he will be back - he's in italics (but in bold as a returning starter).
Conel has announced that he will transfer if he gets the waiver - no announcement yet, he's in italics.
Parker is likely a slam dunk for a waiver (did not wrestle after December his redshirt year, lost the entire year last year to injury) should he decide to pursue it down the road - he's in italics (probably for a while) as I have listed him with SO eligibility.
Lmfao. Now that's funny as shitDo you see where it says click here? Click there.
Just swallowed my chew lolLmfao. Now that's funny as shit
The spread sheet always has a way of picking one up on one of those days where you need some.adrenalineI guess my question was not really about your spreadsheet, but this seemed like a logical place to ask about Conel updates without starting a new thread.
I enjoy reading the spreadsheet. Thank you for putting it together and updating it. I was especially excited when I saw a kid from Chestnut Ridge on there a year or so ago. I forget if it was McCoy or McGill. But just to see someone from Ridge get mentioned as a possibility is nice to see. Hopefully one day I'll get to see a wrestler from Ridge wear the PSU singlet.
Future looks BRIGHT.The spread sheet always has a way of picking one up on one of those days where you need some.adrenaline
I know. With all the grey shirts it kind of got lost, but if you look at the guys that will be enrolling this year and ranked them in the class of 2019 I think you probably have the #1 guy, four of the top 10 and 5 of the top 15-20.Future looks BRIGHT.
Thanks! Great spreadsheet, very informativeI have no idea.
Just so everyone knows (I know many do, but there are always new posters), I'm no insider when it comes to PSU recruiting (and from my conversations with my insider, I'm guessing that the only real insiders are on the staff). Guys on the prospect list are either committed, I've seen something online linking them as a PSU target or they fit the geographical or ranking profile. Occasionally, I might throw in someone outside of the above but that's my prerogative - it's my sheet.
Stevo DOES fit the geographical profile, but I'm usually pretty careful adding the little guys until they really wow you or they get bigger or older. Projecting a 106 frosh can be daunting. Alejandro didn't make the list until early this year when he started beating some really good kids who had showed something at weights higher than 106.
Thanks again for compiling and maintaining the file!I have no idea.
Just so everyone knows (I know many do, but there are always new posters), I'm no insider when it comes to PSU recruiting (and from my conversations with my insider, I'm guessing that the only real insiders are on the staff). Guys on the prospect list are either committed, I've seen something online linking them as a PSU target or they fit the geographical or ranking profile. Occasionally, I might throw in someone outside of the above but that's my prerogative - it's my sheet.
Stevo DOES fit the geographical profile, but I'm usually pretty careful adding the little guys until they really wow you or they get bigger or older. Projecting a 106 frosh can be daunting. Alejandro didn't make the list until early this year when he started beating some really good kids who had showed something at weights higher than 106.
Welcome to the crowd...you're normal.Thanks @tikk10
Yes I had read the list by Tim, but on my phone the link wasn't showing up, so I didn't know how to get to the link....so in other words, user error on my part![]()
When will the tyranny of Rivals’ worst-practice CSS end? Links should always be underlined at a minimum. Guess they want fewer “bounces” off-site, but it’s a bogus strategy, imo. If I was paying to post, I’d demand a discount.Welcome to the crowd...you're normal.
If Tim or Tom, or someone else could BOLD UNDERLINE AND COLOR the text "Click here", it might be more obvious.
Dice....last seen in A Star is Born.
The tyranny could be worse (for some people). It could have itty bitty wings or be from Rutgers.When will the tyranny ... end? ...![]()