ADVERTISEMENT

Did Maryland botch not choosing James Franklin?

Interesting.

IMHO, it takes so much to BUILD a program. And while PSU was struggling in the post-scandal years, we still had 100K coming to games and getting TV ratings. MD does not and will not.

You've got to give a lot of credit to CJF for being a key member who built PSU up from the survival years under O'Brien to the bowl years of CJF. The next step, to being a legit natty contender, is much harder. I feel like the staff and team still have a little of that blue collar mentality and need to graduate to a white collar mentality. By that I mean a confident stagger where the stage against the UMs, tOSUs and USC's aren't too big.

I love talking to executives that started out on farms or from families of working class parents. They all have that inflection point. My son told me a few years ago that his boss quit in the middle of a huge project. He was called out of his cubicle to go to a meeting by the c-level boss two steps up from him. in the room was the entire c-suite of his software company. They started asking him questions about the project. He told me he had an out of body experience where he could hear himself talking and felt like "hey, I am doing this. I am the smartest one in the room on this subject. How did it happen that the entire company is listening to me on this important project". He walked out of the meeting a new person. What that accepted the responsibility and knew his worth. I think PSU needs to have that moment.
Disagree on blue vs white collar. Penn State was always a blue collar team…when at its best, it could stop the run and run the football. Physical.

We have lost that and with it the ability to go toe-to-toe with the best teams.

I remember how we used to snicker at the Big10…now we are stuck in Big10, tier 2 and removed from being a National contender.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 91Joe95
It would be interesting to look at the records in recent years to see if there are any trends related to "offensive" vs "defensive* vs "CEO" head coaches. There are a lot of factors beyond just that metric but I wonder if it would really show less success for a CEO head coach.

Should be on just a numbers game.

Chances of hitting on both coordinators is lower than just having to hit on one, especially if have to keep replacing them if they are successful and get their own HD gig.

USC's O will always be at least pretty good with LR at the helm; problem has been the D.

That seems to have changed with the hiring of UCLA's former DC and Ravens D disciple.

Along similar lines with Andy Reid and the Chiefs.

The Chiefs have been good on both sides of the ball ever since Spags became their DC and it seems like he will be there for the long haul.

Conversely, the Eagles floundered on both sides of the ball last season after having lost both of their coordinators and under Tomlin, the Steelers O has floundered for half the time he's been the man in charge.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT