Is that the narrative this week? I’d hate to see the voters give Franklin and the team credit for a big win on the road.
Is that the narrative this week? I’d hate to see the voters give Franklin and the team credit for a big win on the road.
As others have pointed out, the experts were down on us after a close win over Pitt. OTOH, the experts were high on Maryland after a LOSS to Temple. It makes no sense but that's how they think. So we hammer Maryland and the experts will say the Terps were overrated therefore the win didn't mean much.
Is that the narrative this week? I’d hate to see the voters give Franklin and the team credit for a big win on the road.
Yes, this is clearly a "statement" game for Mighty Michigan, demonstrating they are back in the saddle again against fearsome Rutgers.Yes. need to make room in the top 10 for Michigan after they beat a powerful Rutgers team
This Well Done.Sportswriter generic template/topics (sentence starters) for Penn State post 2011.
1. The team they played was a bad mid-major and Penn State only beat them by 4 Or 5 TD’s.
2. The team Penn State played was exposed last week by a not very good (insert team of choice).
3. This is not likely to happen against (insert next opponent or check schedule to see if Ohio State/Michigan remain). (Explain why Ohio State/Michigan is so good, name co-ordinators, or cite series history)
4. Franklin (game management, clock management, player management, is a car salesman, etc) go from there.
5. Wait to see what the PAC-12 games results are, pick the one with the best record, always explain west coast bias and why this team is better than Penn State. (Works very well until best team has 3 losses)
6. Keep reminding readers how lucky Penn State is to even be playing football.
7. Joe Paterno is in fact the devil.