What should have happened is debatable, but what did happen can only be described as incompetent and cowardly beyond defense. And despite his many faults, even Lanny Davis knew this.
If research were to be done on the subject, who would you like to see do it? Or to put it another way, if Penn State published its own research and findings on the topic, would you believe it?
As long as you stay out of my neighborhood with your boat trailer I really don't give a rat's rump what you do. If you devote efforts to what you view as injustices, good for you. That will ensure that you aren't spending time screwing up something that I do care about.I do not live my life day to day as though it depended on the outcome of this saga, either. OTOH, I try to deal with the injustices I see every day, and this is a very big one that happened 4 years ago. That the national media do not cover this has no more impact on whether an injustice has occurred than its similar failure to cover Jerry Sandusky for years after the abuse began. Their gullibility, laziness and unprofessionalism is not the shining evidence of irrelevance you seem to wish it were. Like I say, it's a long game. I am in to the end. If it bores or frustrates you, too bad. Don't watch what I do, and then you won't be bored or frustrated.
This gets into contingencies. "X happened and event subsequently unfolded this way, but if X hadn't happened how would events have unfolded?" That by nature is to some degree speculative. But the indelicate way JVP was ousted aside, if you think any scenario that involved PSU leaving JVP in his job without even a suspension would have turned out better for PSU in the long run I would strongly disagree.
Very weird how you only show up on this issue. You are the dude that claimed the public should determine what Penn State should do, in essence the mob rules.
There isn't one person on this board who argues that Joe should have been left in his job as if nothing was going on. In fact, no one here mentions that option ever, except you. Curious.
I comment about other issues. And to be clear, although I grew up in PA, I went to undergrad at WVU, lest people assume I went to PSU just because I post there. (I'm in your general neck of the woods now...Jim Valvano, I think, is buried in your town.) I find this board more interesting than the WVU OT board, which unfortunately is dominated by a few hyper-partisan political types. So I post here, respectfully, and I appreciate the fact that I'm permitted to do so.
It seems to me that the prevailing view on this board is that the PSU BOT should have said to the public, basically, "We'll look into this whole situation and let you know what we find, in the meantime the games will continue as normal." I get the impression that JVP being allowed to finish the season is an overwhelming majority opinion on this board.
IMO the PSU BOT doing that would have made things much worse. You can call it mob rule or you can call it being sensitive to public opinion, but regardless the PSU BOT had to so something. It wouldn't just say "We'll look into it." They had to at least suspend JVP, which for him would have been career-ending anyway.
As long as you stay out of my neighborhood with your boat trailer I really don't give a rat's rump what you do. If you devote efforts to what you view as injustices, good for you. That will ensure that you aren't spending time screwing up something that I do care about.
I get the impression that JVP being allowed to finish the season is an overwhelming majority opinion on this board.
No one on here ever says that. Period. You say it an michnitt and some other of the usual weird toadies then Like it. It's weird man.
Let me let you in on a little secret. The Michigan State Board of Trustees wanted to defend Penn State and its administration when the news broke. However, seeing the Penn State Board of Trustees was unwilling to defend its own school, the Michigan State board decided against the idea.
John Surma blamed Penn State athletics and Joe Paterno.
The act(s) of the Penn State Board of Trustees brought great shame to the school.
They had responsibility for oversight yet they blame Joe for staying too long.
And they all say it with the same diction and verbiage. Its almost uncanny.
How about putting up a poll? Let's rough draft it.
Question: What should the PSU BOT have done in Nov 2011.
Possible Answers:
A. Nothing at all.
B. Issue a statement saying they're investigating the issue and in the meantime the football program will continue as normal.
C. Issue a statement saying that JVP has been suspended until the issue is investigated.
D. Issue a statement saying that JVP has been fired.
E. Issue a statement saying that PSU football has been suspended until the issue has been investigated.
I'm trying to cover all possible bases here, which is what a good poll does. Offer suggestions for changes to it.
I comment about other issues. And to be clear, although I grew up in PA, I went to undergrad at WVU, lest people assume I went to PSU just because I post there. (I'm in your general neck of the woods now...Jim Valvano, I think, is buried in your town.) I find this board more interesting than the WVU OT board, which unfortunately is dominated by a few hyper-partisan political types. So I post here, respectfully, and I appreciate the fact that I'm permitted to do so.
It seems to me that the prevailing view on this board is that the PSU BOT should have said to the public, basically, "We'll look into this whole situation and let you know what we find, in the meantime the games will continue as normal." I get the impression that JVP being allowed to finish the season is an overwhelming majority opinion on this board.
IMO the PSU BOT doing that would have made things much worse. You can call it mob rule or you can call it being sensitive to public opinion, but regardless the PSU BOT had to so something. It wouldn't just say "We'll look into it." They had to at least suspend JVP, which for him would have been career-ending anyway.
If that's your attempt to cover all bases you're not very bright. You didn't even list what they did do.
Include Mr. Heim among those branded with a scarlet "T" who will be eternally scorned in public. He certainly didn't expect to get bushwhacked prior to the Armed Service ceremony.To the extent that they sought to shift the blame for this stuff from their fellow BoT members and TSM Board friends, I cannot deny that they momentarily succeeded, and maybe some of them will die before we get even.
But they ought to have been more careful in what they wished for. Thousands upon thousands of good people with fine educations will treat their names as Mudd for a very, very long time, as Paul Suhey Jr. found out, and the beauty is that they will never know when they are among us. They will always be afraid wherever they live to get a Civic Award or recognition of any kind, because WE could be there waiting to remind those who honor them that they are dishonest, lying scum, whatever good they may have done.
I will NEVER forget what they did. Until a full accounting is rendered, and they own not only what they did but WHY they did it, forgiveness is not an option. They can avoid famous, recognizable people like Franco, but they will not be able to forever avoid PennStaters in their communities, in their companies, or in public. When they are called out publicly, it will confirm and heighten the low level anxiety they feel already, and will commence it for those who have not felt it up to now.
It will never be over until they are dead. I am prepared to live with that if they are. And that is assuming we do not eventually get our hands on the emails (undoubtedly there are some) which tend to show it. In that event, they will be made to feel sorrow about this if only for themselves.
First of all, they should have started to get ahead of this no later than 1 April 2011.How about putting up a poll? Let's rough draft it.
Question: What should the PSU BOT have done in Nov 2011.
Possible Answers:
A. Nothing at all.
B. Issue a statement saying they're investigating the issue and in the meantime the football program will continue as normal.
C. Issue a statement saying that JVP has been suspended until the issue is investigated.
D. Issue a statement saying that JVP has been fired.
E. Issue a statement saying that PSU football has been suspended until the issue has been investigated.
I'm trying to cover all possible bases here, which is what a good poll does. Offer suggestions for changes to it.
How about putting up a poll? Let's rough draft it.
.
Joe's statement to the press seemed to indicate when he thought he should step down.First of all, they should have started to get ahead of this no later than 1 April 2011.
As far as what they should have done in Nov 2011, they should have spoken to Joe and have him voluntarily step down as HC as this is investigated. If he did not agree, then they should have suspended him.
WPXI@WPXITarget11
Breaking: ncaa has subpoenaed latrobe based Duquesne brewing over joe paterno beer #wpxi
I hope it haunts his ass right to his grave. He had an opportunity to do the right thing. He did the expedient thing. Screw him.I think Garban could not in good conscious deliver that message. I believe he knew what was going on and how wrong it was that they were scapegoating Joe. And others knew that as well. Only no one spoke up with any true resolve. I've heard that this greatly disturbs Garban to this day.
How about having a press conference WITH Joe there. They could announce that Joe was voluntarily taking a leave of absence. Doing what they did, stated emphatically that Joe was guilty and had to be fired. Since then, prominent members of the BoT that night, have testified that Joe was not fired for a failure of leadership. They bleeping lied that night. Surma got his revenge for his brother Vic, whose son walked on, didn't play, and Vic blamed Joe for his subsequent leaving school and getting involved in shady crap in Florida, which ultimately led to his death in Manhattan.How about putting up a poll? Let's rough draft it.
Question: What should the PSU BOT have done in Nov 2011.
Possible Answers:
A. Nothing at all.
B. Issue a statement saying they're investigating the issue and in the meantime the football program will continue as normal.
C. Issue a statement saying that JVP has been suspended until the issue is investigated.
D. Issue a statement saying that JVP has been fired.
E. Issue a statement saying that PSU football has been suspended until the issue has been investigated.
I'm trying to cover all possible bases here, which is what a good poll does. Offer suggestions for changes to it.
Suspending Joe from coaching was the right decision. However, the BoT (Surma) completely botched the reasons publicly stated for Joe's removal. It should have been administrative leave with pay and Surma should have said that the BoT wasn't making any judgments about the legal or ethical culpability of Joe, Spanier, McQueary, Curley, Schultz, Sandusky, etc. Surma also should have pleaded with the media (public) for due process and "innocent until proven guilty," but the plea would have fallen on deaf ears at that time.
And, of course, they completely screwed up in failing to consult with Joe (so far as we know) and in the manner they delivered the news to him.
How about putting up a poll? Let's rough draft it.
Question: What should the PSU BOT have done in Nov 2011.
I suggest that you roll that clock back to at least March 2011 and try again.
see way aboveOkay, what would the poll options be if the question is "What should the PSU BOT have done in March 2011?"
Okay, what would the poll options be if the question is "What should the PSU BOT have done in March 2011?"
GFYAs long as you stay out of my neighborhood with your boat trailer I really don't give a rat's rump what you do. If you devote efforts to what you view as injustices, good for you. That will ensure that you aren't spending time screwing up something that I do care about.
I comment about other issues. And to be clear, although I grew up in PA, I went to undergrad at WVU, lest people assume I went to PSU just because I post there. (I'm in your general neck of the woods now...Jim Valvano, I think, is buried in your town.) I find this board more interesting than the WVU OT board, which unfortunately is dominated by a few hyper-partisan political types. So I post here, respectfully, and I appreciate the fact that I'm permitted to do so.
It seems to me that the prevailing view on this board is that the PSU BOT should have said to the public, basically, "We'll look into this whole situation and let you know what we find, in the meantime the games will continue as normal." I get the impression that JVP being allowed to finish the season is an overwhelming majority opinion on this board.
IMO the PSU BOT doing that would have made things much worse. You can call it mob rule or you can call it being sensitive to public opinion, but regardless the PSU BOT had to so something. It wouldn't just say "We'll look into it." They had to at least suspend JVP, which for him would have been career-ending anyway.
Okay, what would the poll options be if the question is "What should the PSU BOT have done in March 2011?"
Asked a question. Any question. They admitted they didn't ask a single one. Not one. They even lied about being briefed but were caught red handed. Its OK. We understand you didn't know that.
I hope it haunts his ass right to his grave. He had an opportunity to do the right thing. He did the expedient thing. Screw him.
I thought Mimi spoke out against it but maybe I am wrongThat's my point - it will haunt him forever, because he has a conscience. A few others did and do, also, and it will haunt them as well. I also think it should haunt them - their actions/inactions have haunted me and tens or hundreds of thousands of proud PSU loyalists and we don't know when or if that will ever end.
There are a few who it will not haunt, because they appear to have no conscience: Surma, Peetz, Frazier, Dandrea (a mercenary with ties to Surma), Masser, Joyner (an opportunist if ever there was one), etc. I tend to think Suhey is likely bothered by all of this, whether he would ever admit it or not. Maybe even Ira. Mimi and many others who are guilty by their silence when a voice was most needed, no doubt have this on their minds and want do-overs every day of their lives. I'm not defending them, just pointing out that good people on the BOT realize that their inaction and silence failed us all. Just my opinion.
She has. She's fence-hopped on it a bit though.I thought Mimi spoke out against it but maybe I am wrong
I thought Mimi spoke out against it but maybe I am wrong
This, in and of itself, is ample reason why the May 2011 trustees should have resigned. Lack of fiduciary responsibility in failing to ask any questions about the risk assessment that Spanier and Baldwin gave them at that May BoT meeting concerning the Sandusky GJ investigation. And Spanier and Baldwin deserved to be dismissed for delivering to the BoT such a such a naive and faulty risk assessment of the Sandusky investigation.
If there is any uncertainty where "Mimi" stands (now)....go back and read her last "Lunch with Mimi", her conversation with Bloviator Barron.I saw her quoted in Town and Gown (her own publication) within a year after the sanctions about how the Freeh report was erroneous or went too far or something along those lines. Nothing strongly worded, of course, and that was all I saw other than the fact that when she tried to say something on that fateful night, Surma shut her up and apparently intimidated anyone else from talking, including Garban. Al Clemens also backed away from the BOT's official stance (or non-stance). My guess is that the school admin has threatened the life out of people who gain their livelihood from PSU from ever speaking their minds about it. Steve Jones has never said anything publicly that I am aware of, for example. The fact that 'The Joe We Know' was allowed as much leeway as it got on campuses was due to it not being about the issue and the response, but rather about Joe's impact on the lives of the players.
I understand there is going to be a Lions Tales about Joe - I thought it was scheduled to be aired last week, but I have not seen it. Sandy herself told me this at the end of the town hall last week in response to me imploring her to not be afraid to trumpet "Success With Honor" while invoking Joe's name prominently front and center.
And thanks for posting the things you're comfortable posting, Misder. It is good to get informed input, even if somewhat cryptic at times, to know the good fight is worth the battle.